Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
World Journal of Surgery
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2009

01-05-2009

Value of Laparoscopic Appendectomy in the Elderly Patient

Authors: Boris Kirshtein, Zvi Howard Perry, Solly Mizrahi, Leonid Lantsberg

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 5/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Acute appendicitis (AA) in elderly patients (60 years of age and older) is a challenging problem associated with significant morbidity and mortality when perforation is present. We hypothesized that laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) would enable an earlier correct diagnosis and have advantages in elderly patients.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for suspected AA. Data of elderly patients were compared to data of younger patients (18 to <60 years of age).

Results

Fifty-four LA were performed in elderly patients and 423 in younger patients. Patients over the age of 60 years had more co-morbidities and required more frequent use of anticoagulants. Preoperative imaging (ultrasound or computerized tomography) was significantly more frequent in elderly patients (36% versus 15%), and was associated with a higher rate of confirmation of acute appendicitis (78% versus 55%), which allowed a decrease in the rate of negative surgical explorations to 4.1% in elderly patients compared to 10.2% in younger patients. Complicated appendicitis and conversions were more frequent in the elderly patients. This resulted in prolonged operative time and longer hospital stay for this group. The overall complication rate was equivalent in the two groups, without differences in the occurrence either of infectious complications or of complications related to surgical site. There were no deaths following appendectomy in our series.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe in the elderly population and is not associated with any increase in morbidity. The high incidence of complicated appendicitis in elderly patients affects operative time and length of hospital stay following laparoscopic appendectomy, and it can also lead to an increased rate of conversion to an open procedure. Use of preoperative abdominal computerized tomography scan is mandatory in elderly patients to provide an early diagnosis and to decrease unnecessary surgical exploration when acute appendicitis is suspected.
Literature
1.
Fagbohun CF, Toy EC, Baker B (1999) The evaluation of acute abdominal pain in the elderly patient. Primary Care Update Ob/Gyn 181–185
2.
Sheu BF, Chiu TF, Chen JC et al (2007) Risk factors associated with perforated appendicitis in elderly patients presenting with signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis. Aust N Z J Surg 77:662–666CrossRef
3.
Franz MG, Norman J, Fabri PJ (1995) Increased morbidity of appendicitis with advancing age. Am Surg 61:40–44PubMed
4.
Yamini D, Vargas H, Bongard F et al (1998) Perforated appendicitis: is it truly a surgical urgency? Am Surg 64:970–975PubMed
5.
Storm-Dickerson TL, Horattas MC (2003) What have we learned over the past 20 years about appendicitis in the elderly? Am J Surg 185:198–201PubMedCrossRef
6.
Lunca S, Bouras G, Romedea NS (2004) Acute appendicitis in the elderly patient: diagnostic problems, prognostic factors and outcomes. Rom J Gastroenterol 13:299–303PubMed
7.
Lee SL, Walsh AJ, Ho HS (2001) Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 136:556–562PubMedCrossRef
8.
Fuchs JR, Schlamberg JS, Shortsleeve MJ et al (2002) Impact of abdominal CT imaging on the management of appendicitis: an update. J Surg Res 106:131–136PubMedCrossRef
9.
Hui TT, Major KM, Avital I et al (2002) Outcome of elderly patients with appendicitis: effect of computed tomography and laparoscopy. Arch Surg 137:995–998, discussion 999–1000PubMedCrossRef
10.
Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D (1998) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 186:545–553PubMedCrossRef
11.
Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P et al (1999) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 177:250–256PubMedCrossRef
12.
Paik PS, Towson JA, Anthone GJ et al (1997) Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. J Gastrointest Surg 1:188–193PubMedCrossRef
13.
Krisher SL, Browne A, Dibbins A et al (2001) Intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Arch Surg 136:438–441PubMedCrossRef
14.
Von Titte SN, McCabe CJ, Ottinger LW (1996) Delayed appendectomy for appendicitis: causes and consequences. Am J Emerg Med 14:620–622CrossRef
15.
Kim K, Lee CC, Song KJ et al (2008) The impact of helical computed tomography on the negative appendectomy rate: a multi-center comparison. J Emerg Med 34:3–6PubMedCrossRef
16.
Gwynn LK (2001) The diagnosis of acute appendicitis: clinical assessment versus computed tomography evaluation. J Emerg Med 21:119–123PubMedCrossRef
17.
Horton MD, Counter SF, Florence MG et al (2000) A prospective trial of computed tomography and ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in the atypical patient. Am J Surg 179:379–381PubMedCrossRef
18.
Laurell H, Hansson LE, Gunnarsson U (2006) Acute abdominal pain among elderly patients. Gerontology 52:339–344PubMedCrossRef
19.
Wang YC, Yang HR, Chung PK et al (2006) Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly. Surg Endosc 20:887–889PubMedCrossRef
20.
Guller U, Jain N, Peterson ED et al (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly. Surgery 135:479–488PubMedCrossRef
21.
Galizia G, Prizio G, Lieto E et al (2001) Hemodynamic and pulmonary changes during open, carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and abdominal wall-lifting cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study. Surg Endosc 15:477–483PubMedCrossRef
22.
Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR (2008) Abdominal lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD006574
Metadata
Title
Value of Laparoscopic Appendectomy in the Elderly Patient
Authors
Boris Kirshtein
Zvi Howard Perry
Solly Mizrahi
Leonid Lantsberg
Publication date
01-05-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 5/2009
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9916-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2009

World Journal of Surgery 5/2009 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Use of Intraoperative Insulin Assay for the Localisation of Insulinoma

OriginalPaper

Selective Sentinel Node Plus Additional Non-Sentinel Node Biopsy Based on an FDG-PET/CT Scan in Early Breast Cancer Patients: Single Institutional Experience

OriginalPaper

Single Port Access Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (with video)

OriginalPaper

Predictive Factors for Morbidity and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: Age, ASA Score and Operation Type Influence Morbidity

Letter

Reply

Letter

Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma