Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2008

01-07-2008

Value of Multidetector-row Computed Tomography in Diagnosis of Portal Vein Invasion by Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Authors: Teiichi Sugiura, Hideki Nishio, Masato Nagino, Yoshiki Senda, Tomoki Ebata, Yukihiro Yokoyama, Tsuyoshi Igami, Koji Oda, Yuji Nimura

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 7/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although knowledge of cancer invasion of the portal bifurcation is vitally important in planning an operation for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, the diagnostic capability of multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) for this purpose has not been assessed. We evaluated how well MDCT could identify cancer invasion of the portal bifurcation by perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

Between April 2003 and June 2005, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma was resected in 87 patients, 83 of whom underwent MDCT within 1 month before the surgery. Three-dimensional volume-rendered (3DVR) and multiplanar reformation (MPR) images were examined for evidence of portal vein invasion. Agreement with intraoperative and pathologic findings was assessed. Portal bifurcation findings by 3DVR and MPR were classified into no portal vein stenosis, unilateral stenosis, or more extensive stenosis, and also into tumor contact with the bifurcation in no, one of two, or two projections.

Results

For macroscopic portal vein invasion, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy were 81.5, 91.1, 81.5, 91.1, and 88.0% in 3D portography and 96.3, 92.6, 86.7, 98.1, and 94.0% in MPR, respectively. Findings by both 3DVR and MPR were significantly correlated with depth of cancer invasion (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

MDCT is useful in assessing cancer invasion of the portal vein bifurcation by perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Longmire WP, McArthur MS, Bastounis EA et al (1973) Carcinoma of the extrahepatic biliary tract. Ann Surg 178:333–345PubMedCrossRef Longmire WP, McArthur MS, Bastounis EA et al (1973) Carcinoma of the extrahepatic biliary tract. Ann Surg 178:333–345PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Blumgart LH, Drury JK, Wood CB (1979) Hepatic resection for trauma, tumour and biliary obstruction. Br J Surg 66:762–769PubMedCrossRef Blumgart LH, Drury JK, Wood CB (1979) Hepatic resection for trauma, tumour and biliary obstruction. Br J Surg 66:762–769PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sakaguchi S, Nakamura S (1986) Surgery of the portal vein in resection of cancer of the hepatic hilus. Surgery 99:344–349PubMed Sakaguchi S, Nakamura S (1986) Surgery of the portal vein in resection of cancer of the hepatic hilus. Surgery 99:344–349PubMed
4.
go back to reference Lygidakis NJ, van der Heyde MN, van Dongen RJ et al (1988) Surgical approaches for unresectable primary carcinoma of the hepatic hilus. Surg Gynecol Obstet 166:107–114PubMed Lygidakis NJ, van der Heyde MN, van Dongen RJ et al (1988) Surgical approaches for unresectable primary carcinoma of the hepatic hilus. Surg Gynecol Obstet 166:107–114PubMed
5.
go back to reference Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J et al (1991) Combined portal vein and liver resection for carcinoma of the biliary tract. Br J Surg 78:727–731PubMedCrossRef Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J et al (1991) Combined portal vein and liver resection for carcinoma of the biliary tract. Br J Surg 78:727–731PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Klempnauer J, Ridder GJ, von Wasielewski R et al (1997) Resectional surgery of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. J Clin Oncol 15:947–954PubMed Klempnauer J, Ridder GJ, von Wasielewski R et al (1997) Resectional surgery of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. J Clin Oncol 15:947–954PubMed
7.
go back to reference Miyazaki M, Ito H, Nakagawa K et al (1999) Parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy in the surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 189:575–583PubMedCrossRef Miyazaki M, Ito H, Nakagawa K et al (1999) Parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy in the surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 189:575–583PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Bechstein WO et al (1999) Extended resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 230:808–818; discussion 819PubMedCrossRef Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Bechstein WO et al (1999) Extended resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 230:808–818; discussion 819PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Kondo S et al (2000) Aggressive preoperative management and extended surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Nagoya experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 7:155–162PubMedCrossRef Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Kondo S et al (2000) Aggressive preoperative management and extended surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Nagoya experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 7:155–162PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Settmacher U et al (2003) Surgical management of proximal bile duct cancer: extended right lobe resection increases resectability and radicality. Langenbecks Arch Surg 388:194–200PubMedCrossRef Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Settmacher U et al (2003) Surgical management of proximal bile duct cancer: extended right lobe resection increases resectability and radicality. Langenbecks Arch Surg 388:194–200PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lee SG, Lee YJ, Park KM et al (2000) One hundred and eleven liver resections for hilar bile duct cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 7:135–141PubMedCrossRef Lee SG, Lee YJ, Park KM et al (2000) One hundred and eleven liver resections for hilar bile duct cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 7:135–141PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gerhards MF, van Gulik TM, de Wit LT et al (2000) Evaluation of morbidity and mortality after resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma–a single center experience. Surgery 127:395–404PubMedCrossRef Gerhards MF, van Gulik TM, de Wit LT et al (2000) Evaluation of morbidity and mortality after resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma–a single center experience. Surgery 127:395–404PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ebata T, Nagino M, Kamiya J et al (2003) Hepatectomy with portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: audit of 52 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 238:720–727PubMedCrossRef Ebata T, Nagino M, Kamiya J et al (2003) Hepatectomy with portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: audit of 52 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 238:720–727PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kondo S, Hirano S, Ambo Y et al (2004) Forty consecutive resections of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with no postoperative mortality and no positive ductal margins: results of a prospective study. Ann Surg 240:95–101PubMedCrossRef Kondo S, Hirano S, Ambo Y et al (2004) Forty consecutive resections of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with no postoperative mortality and no positive ductal margins: results of a prospective study. Ann Surg 240:95–101PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Williamson BW, Blumgart LH, McKellar NJ (1980) Management of tumors of the liver. Combined use of arteriography and venography in the assessment of resectability, especially in hilar tumors. Am J Surg 139:210–215PubMedCrossRef Williamson BW, Blumgart LH, McKellar NJ (1980) Management of tumors of the liver. Combined use of arteriography and venography in the assessment of resectability, especially in hilar tumors. Am J Surg 139:210–215PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nishio H, Kamiya J, Nagino M et al (1999) Value of percutaneous transhepatic portography before hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 86:1415–1421PubMedCrossRef Nishio H, Kamiya J, Nagino M et al (1999) Value of percutaneous transhepatic portography before hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 86:1415–1421PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J et al (1990) Hepatic segmentectomy with caudate lobe resection for bile duct carcinoma of the hepatic hilus. World J Surg 14:535–543PubMedCrossRef Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J et al (1990) Hepatic segmentectomy with caudate lobe resection for bile duct carcinoma of the hepatic hilus. World J Surg 14:535–543PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J et al (1995) Hilar cholangiocarcinoma–surgical anatomy and curative resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2:239–248CrossRef Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J et al (1995) Hilar cholangiocarcinoma–surgical anatomy and curative resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2:239–248CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nagino M, Nimura Y, Kamiya J et al (1995) Changes in hepatic lobe volume in biliary tract cancer patients after right portal vein embolization. Hepatology 21:434–439PubMed Nagino M, Nimura Y, Kamiya J et al (1995) Changes in hepatic lobe volume in biliary tract cancer patients after right portal vein embolization. Hepatology 21:434–439PubMed
20.
go back to reference Nagino M, Nimura Y, Kamiya J et al (1996) Selective percutaneous transhepatic embolization of the portal vein in preparation for extensive liver resection: the ipsilateral approach. Radiology 200:559–563PubMed Nagino M, Nimura Y, Kamiya J et al (1996) Selective percutaneous transhepatic embolization of the portal vein in preparation for extensive liver resection: the ipsilateral approach. Radiology 200:559–563PubMed
21.
go back to reference Nagino M, Kamiya J, Kanai M et al (2000) Right trisegment portal vein embolization for biliary tract carcinoma: technique and clinical utility. Surgery 127:155–160PubMedCrossRef Nagino M, Kamiya J, Kanai M et al (2000) Right trisegment portal vein embolization for biliary tract carcinoma: technique and clinical utility. Surgery 127:155–160PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nagino M, Kamiya J, Nishio H et al (2006) Two hundred forty consecutive portal vein embolizations before extended hepatectomy for biliary cancer: surgical outcome and long-term follow-up. Ann Surg 243:364–372PubMedCrossRef Nagino M, Kamiya J, Nishio H et al (2006) Two hundred forty consecutive portal vein embolizations before extended hepatectomy for biliary cancer: surgical outcome and long-term follow-up. Ann Surg 243:364–372PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kaneko T, Nakao A, Inoue S et al (1995) Intraportal endovascular ultrasonography in the diagnosis of portal vein invasion by pancreatobiliary carcinoma. Ann Surg 222:711–718PubMedCrossRef Kaneko T, Nakao A, Inoue S et al (1995) Intraportal endovascular ultrasonography in the diagnosis of portal vein invasion by pancreatobiliary carcinoma. Ann Surg 222:711–718PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Choi BI, Lee JH, Han MC et al (1989) Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparative study with sonography and CT. Radiology 172:689–692PubMed Choi BI, Lee JH, Han MC et al (1989) Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparative study with sonography and CT. Radiology 172:689–692PubMed
25.
go back to reference Nesbit GM, Johnson CD, James EM et al (1988) Cholangiocarcinoma: diagnosis and evaluation of resectability by CT and sonography as procedures complementary to cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 151:933–938PubMed Nesbit GM, Johnson CD, James EM et al (1988) Cholangiocarcinoma: diagnosis and evaluation of resectability by CT and sonography as procedures complementary to cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 151:933–938PubMed
26.
go back to reference Sahani D, Saini S, Pena C et al (2002) Using multidetector CT for preoperative vascular evaluation of liver neoplasms: technique and results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:53–59PubMed Sahani D, Saini S, Pena C et al (2002) Using multidetector CT for preoperative vascular evaluation of liver neoplasms: technique and results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:53–59PubMed
27.
go back to reference Lee MG, Park KB, Shin YM et al (2003) Preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast imaging with steady-state precession magnetic resonance angiography: comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. World J Surg 27:278–283PubMedCrossRef Lee MG, Park KB, Shin YM et al (2003) Preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast imaging with steady-state precession magnetic resonance angiography: comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. World J Surg 27:278–283PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Uchida M, Ishibashi M, Tomita N et al (2005) Hilar and suprapancreatic cholangiocarcinoma: value of 3D angiography and multiphase fusion images using MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1572–1577PubMed Uchida M, Ishibashi M, Tomita N et al (2005) Hilar and suprapancreatic cholangiocarcinoma: value of 3D angiography and multiphase fusion images using MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1572–1577PubMed
29.
go back to reference Tsao JI, Nimura Y, Kamiya J et al (2000) Management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of an American and a Japanese experience. Ann Surg 232:166–174PubMedCrossRef Tsao JI, Nimura Y, Kamiya J et al (2000) Management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of an American and a Japanese experience. Ann Surg 232:166–174PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Value of Multidetector-row Computed Tomography in Diagnosis of Portal Vein Invasion by Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
Authors
Teiichi Sugiura
Hideki Nishio
Masato Nagino
Yoshiki Senda
Tomoki Ebata
Yukihiro Yokoyama
Tsuyoshi Igami
Koji Oda
Yuji Nimura
Publication date
01-07-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 7/2008
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9547-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2008

World Journal of Surgery 7/2008 Go to the issue