Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 2/2008

01-02-2008 | Editorial Perspective

To Drain or not to Drain? The Role of Drainage in the Contaminated and Infected Abdomen: An International and Personal Perspective

Author: Moshe Schein

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Excerpt

The history of abdominal drainage is as old as the history of surgery [1]. However, abdominal drainage has always been a subject of controversy, practiced in confusion and subjected to local dogmas. Hence, a hundred years ago there were ardent enthusiasts for drainage, like Robert Lawson Tait (1845–1899), who stated: “When in doubt drain!” There were also the skeptics, like J. L. Yates (1905), who understood that “Drainage of the general peritoneal cavity is a physical and physiological impossibility.” And, as always, there were the undecided, as described by Joseph Price (1853–1911): “There are those who ardently advocate it, there are those who in great part reject it, there are those who are lukewarm concerning it, and finally, some who, without convictions, are either for or against it … as chance or whim, not logic may determine.” …
Literature
1.
go back to reference O’Connor TW, Hugh TB (1979) Abdominal drainage: a clinical review. Aust N Z J Surg 49:253–260PubMed O’Connor TW, Hugh TB (1979) Abdominal drainage: a clinical review. Aust N Z J Surg 49:253–260PubMed
2.
go back to reference Gilas T, Schein M, Frykberg E (1998) A surgical Internet discussion list (Surginet): a novel venue for international communication among surgeons. Arch Surg 133:1126–1130PubMedCrossRef Gilas T, Schein M, Frykberg E (1998) A surgical Internet discussion list (Surginet): a novel venue for international communication among surgeons. Arch Surg 133:1126–1130PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Petrowsky H, Demartines N, Rousson V, et al. (2004) Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 204:1074–1085CrossRef Petrowsky H, Demartines N, Rousson V, et al. (2004) Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 204:1074–1085CrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference Lewis RT, Goodall RG, Marien B, et al. (1990) Simple elective cholecystectomy: to drain or not. Am J Surg 159:241–245PubMedCrossRef Lewis RT, Goodall RG, Marien B, et al. (1990) Simple elective cholecystectomy: to drain or not. Am J Surg 159:241–245PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Askew J (2006) Survey of the current surgical treatment of gallstones in Queensland. Aust N Z J Surg 76:536CrossRef Askew J (2006) Survey of the current surgical treatment of gallstones in Queensland. Aust N Z J Surg 76:536CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nursal TZ, Yildirim S, Tarim A, et al. (2003) Effect of drainage on postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain after. Langenbecks Arch Surg 388:95–100PubMed Nursal TZ, Yildirim S, Tarim A, et al. (2003) Effect of drainage on postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain after. Langenbecks Arch Surg 388:95–100PubMed
8.
go back to reference Dominguez EP, Giammar D, Baumert J, et al. (2006) Prospective study of bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Am Surg 72:265–268PubMed Dominguez EP, Giammar D, Baumert J, et al. (2006) Prospective study of bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Am Surg 72:265–268PubMed
9.
go back to reference Pai D, Sharma A, Kanungo R, et al. (1999) Role of abdominal drains in perforated duodenal ulcer patients: a prospective controlled study. Aust N Z J Surg 69:210–213PubMedCrossRef Pai D, Sharma A, Kanungo R, et al. (1999) Role of abdominal drains in perforated duodenal ulcer patients: a prospective controlled study. Aust N Z J Surg 69:210–213PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lee YJ, Leung KL, Lai PBS, et al. (2001) Selection of patients for laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 88:133–136PubMedCrossRef Lee YJ, Leung KL, Lai PBS, et al. (2001) Selection of patients for laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 88:133–136PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Urbach DR, Kennedy ED, Cohen MM (1999) Colon and rectal anastomoses do not require routine drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 229:174–180PubMedCrossRef Urbach DR, Kennedy ED, Cohen MM (1999) Colon and rectal anastomoses do not require routine drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 229:174–180PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jesus EC, Karliczek A, Matos D, et al. (2004) Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18(4):CD002100 Jesus EC, Karliczek A, Matos D, et al. (2004) Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18(4):CD002100
13.
go back to reference Surgery of the Anus, Rectum and Colon. Goligher Jc. Baillieae Tindal, London 1984 Surgery of the Anus, Rectum and Colon. Goligher Jc. Baillieae Tindal, London 1984
14.
go back to reference Rotstein OD, Meakins JL (1999) Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of intraabdominal infections. World J Surg 14:159–166CrossRef Rotstein OD, Meakins JL (1999) Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of intraabdominal infections. World J Surg 14:159–166CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Broome AE, Hansson LC, Tyger JF (1983) Efficiency of various types drainage of the peritoneal cavity—an experimental study in man. Acta Chir Scand 149:53–55PubMed Broome AE, Hansson LC, Tyger JF (1983) Efficiency of various types drainage of the peritoneal cavity—an experimental study in man. Acta Chir Scand 149:53–55PubMed
Metadata
Title
To Drain or not to Drain? The Role of Drainage in the Contaminated and Infected Abdomen: An International and Personal Perspective
Author
Moshe Schein
Publication date
01-02-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9277-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

World Journal of Surgery 2/2008 Go to the issue

Letter

Reply

Letter

Reply