Top

World Journal of Surgery

Published in:

Open Access 01-09-2007

Breast-conserving Therapy for Palpable and Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: Can Surgical Residents Do the Job Irrespective of Experience?

Authors: Berry Cleffken, Job Postelmans, Steven Olde Damink, Marius Nap, Ineke Schreutelkamp, Hans van der Bijl

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 9/2007

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of operative experience in obtaining tumor-free margins in breast-conserving therapy. In the case of palpable breast cancers, lumpectomies can safely be performed by any surgical resident. For nonpalpable breast cancers, lumpectomies should be treated only by senior residents or attending surgeons, even if supervision during the operation is given by an attending surgeon for junior residents. Radicality of breast carcinoma excision, defined by the tumor-free margin of the removed specimen has been determined to be the major prognostic factor for local recurrence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of operative experience in obtaining tumor-free margins in breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Can lumpectomy for breast carcinoma be performed by surgical residents safely?

Methods

All lumpectomies for breast carcinoma between 1999 and 2003 were included out of a prospective database of a single institution. Radicality of resection and patient and histopathologic tumor characteristics were analyzed for 660 lumpectomies. Operative experience of the surgeon performing the lumpectomy was staged as junior residents (JR, years 1–3 in residency), senior residents (SR; years 4–6 in residency), and attending surgeon (AS).

Results

A significant difference in obtaining tumor-free margins for palpable tumors was found between ASs (81%) vs. SRs assisted by another resident (92%). For nonpalpable tumors, a significant difference was found in two groups: (1) SRs assisted by another surgical resident (86%) vs. JRs assisted by another surgical resident (61%) and (2) ASs (83%) vs. JRs assisted by another resident (61%) or assisted by an AS (73%).

Conclusion

Surgical residents can safely perform BCT in patients with palpable breast cancer. The level of experience has no statistical significance for palpable tumors in a high-volume center. Nonpalpable lesions should be treated only by SRs or ASs.

Kroman N, Holtveg H, Wohlfahrt J, et al. (2004) Effect of breast-conserving therapy versus radical mastectomy on prognosis for young women with breast carcinoma. Cancer 100(4):688–693PubMedCrossRef

Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(16):1227–1232PubMedCrossRef

Singletary SE (2002) Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 184(5):383–393PubMedCrossRef

Horiguchi J, Iino Y, Takei H, et al. (2001) Recurrence of breast cancer following local excision alone for ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast Cancer 8(1):52–57PubMed

Cox CE, Pendas S, Ku NN, et al. (1998) Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins. Am Surg 64(6):533–537; discussion 537–538PubMed

Meric F, Mirza NQ, Vlastos G, et al. (2003) Positive surgical margins and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence predict disease-specific survival after breast-conserving therapy. Cancer 97(4):926–933PubMedCrossRef

DiBiase SJ, Komarnicky LT, Schwartz GF, et al. (1998) The number of positive margins influences the outcome of women treated with breast preservation for early stage breast carcinoma. Cancer 82(11):2212–2220PubMedCrossRef

Swisher SG, Deford L, Merriman KW, et al. (2000) Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119(6):1126–1132PubMedCrossRef

Lieberman MD, Kilburn H, Lindsey M, et al. (1995) Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg 222(5):638–645PubMedCrossRef

10.

Skinner KA, Helsper JT, Deapen D, et al. (2003) Breast cancer: do specialists make a difference? Ann Surg Oncol 10(6):606–615PubMedCrossRef

11.

Dixon JM, Ravisekar O, Cunningham M, et al. (1996) Factors affecting outcome of patients with impalpable breast cancer detected by breast screening. Br J Surg 83(7):997–1001PubMedCrossRef

12.

Landheer ML, Hoorntje LE, Klinkenbijl JH, et al. (2004) [The surgical treatment of nonpalpable breast carcinoma in a university teaching hospital and a general teaching hospital by residents-in-training and surgeons; comparable results]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 148(35):1724–1727PubMed

13.

Moorthy K, Asopa V, Wiggins E, et al. (2004) Is the reexcision rate higher if breast conservation surgery is performed by surgical trainees? Am J Surg 188(1):45–48PubMedCrossRef

14.

The World Health Organization (1983) Histological typing of breast tumors. Neoplasma 30(1):113–123

15.

Bloom HJ, Richardson WW (1957) Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer; a study of 1409 cases of which 359 have been followed for 15 years. Br J Cancer 11(3):359–377PubMed

16.

Roohan PJ, Bickell NA, Baptiste MS, et al. (1998) Hospital volume differences and five-year survival from breast cancer. Am J Public Health 88(3):454–457PubMedCrossRef

17.

Tartter PI, Kaplan J, Bleiweiss I, et al. (2000) Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg 179(2):81–85PubMedCrossRef

18.

Malik HZ, Purushotham AD, Mallon EA, et al. (1999) Influence of tumour bed assessment on local recurrence following breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 25(3):265–268PubMedCrossRef

19.

Peterson ME, Schultz DJ, Reynolds C, et al. (1999) Outcomes in breast cancer patients relative to margin status after treatment with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy: the University of Pennsylvania experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 43(5):1029–1035PubMedCrossRef

20.

Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, et al. (2000) Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol 18(8):1668–1675PubMed

21.

Luu HH, Otis CN, Reed WP Jr, et al. (1999) The unsatisfactory margin in breast cancer surgery. Am J Surg 178(5):362–366PubMedCrossRef

22.

Horiguchi J, Iino Y, Takei H, et al. (1999) Surgical margin and breast recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. Oncol Rep 6(1):135–138PubMed

Title: Breast-conserving Therapy for Palpable and Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: Can Surgical Residents Do the Job Irrespective of Experience?
Authors: Berry Cleffken
Job Postelmans
Steven Olde Damink
Marius Nap
Ineke Schreutelkamp
Hans van der Bijl
Publication date: 01-09-2007
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: World Journal of Surgery / Issue 9/2007
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9176-2

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Breast-conserving Therapy for Palpable and Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: Can Surgical Residents Do the Job Irrespective of Experience?

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 9/2007

Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemohyperthermia for Chemoresistant and Recurrent Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Prospective Study of 81 Patients

Typhoid Intestinal Perforations: Twenty-six Year Experience

Daily Diurnal Variation in Admissions for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

One-stage Correction of Rectovestibular Fistula by Transfistula Anorectoplasty (TFARP)

Rural Surgery In India

Reversal of Diabetes in Mice by Intrahepatic Injection of Bone-derived GFP-murine Mesenchymal Stem Cells Infected with the Recombinant Retrovirus-carrying Human Insulin Gene