Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2007

01-08-2007

Postoperative Liver Dysfunction and Future Remnant Liver: Where Is the Limit?

Results of a Prospective Study

Authors: Alessandro Ferrero, Luca Viganò, Roberto Polastri, Andrea Muratore, Haris Eminefendic, Daniele Regge, Lorenzo Capussotti

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 8/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The future remnant liver (FRL) limit for safe major hepatectomy with low risk of postoperative liver failure has not yet been well defined.

Methods

Between April 2000 and September 2004, every patient scheduled for major hepatectomy in our institution underwent CT-volumetry of FRL. Patients with FRL <25% underwent portal vein embolization (PVE). Exclusion criteria were PVE, associated vascular resection and liver cirrhosis. The FRL was correlated with short-term results in patients with normal liver (group A) and those with impaired liver function secondary to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or cholestasis (bilirubin >2 mg/100 ml) (group B). Liver dysfunction was defined as both PT <50% and serum bilirubin level >5 mg/100 ml for three or more consecutive days.

Results

A total of 119 patients were analyzed, 72 in group A and 47 in group B. The FRL value was the only significant risk factor for postoperative liver dysfunction in the univariate and multivariate analysis (p = 0.009). The FRL did not correlate with postoperative mortality and morbidity. Bilirubin and prothrombin time (PT) on days 3 and 7 were significantly correlated to FRL in both groups. In group A, patients with postoperative liver dysfunction had a FRL<30% (3 versus 0; p = 0.005). According to receiving operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, a FRL value of 26.5% predicted postoperative liver dysfunction with 66.7% sensitivity, 97.1% specificity, 50% positive predictive value (PPV), and 98.5% negative predictive value (NPV). In group B, patients with postoperative liver dysfunction had a FRL <35% (4 versus 0; p = 0.027). According to ROC curve analysis, a FRL value of 31.05% predicted postoperative liver dysfunction with 75% sensitivity, 79.1% specificity, 25% PPV, and 97.1% NPV.

Conclusions

Hepatectomy can be considered safe when FRL is >26.5% in patients with healthy liver and >31% in patients with impaired liver function.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Imamura H, Seyama Y, Kokudo N, et al. (2004) Single and multiple resections of multiple hepatic metastases of colorectal origin. Surgery 135:508–517PubMedCrossRef Imamura H, Seyama Y, Kokudo N, et al. (2004) Single and multiple resections of multiple hepatic metastases of colorectal origin. Surgery 135:508–517PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. (2001) Improving survival results after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study of 377 patients over 10 years. Ann Surg 234:63–70PubMedCrossRef Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. (2001) Improving survival results after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study of 377 patients over 10 years. Ann Surg 234:63–70PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL, et al. (1999) Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: toward zero hospital deaths. Ann Surg 229:322–330PubMedCrossRef Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL, et al. (1999) Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: toward zero hospital deaths. Ann Surg 229:322–330PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Torzilli G, Makuuchi M, Inoue K, et al. (1999) No-mortality liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients. Is there a way? A prospective analysis of our approach. Arch Surg 134:984–992PubMedCrossRef Torzilli G, Makuuchi M, Inoue K, et al. (1999) No-mortality liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients. Is there a way? A prospective analysis of our approach. Arch Surg 134:984–992PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, et al. (2002) Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 236:397–406PubMedCrossRef Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, et al. (2002) Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 236:397–406PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ferrero A, Polastri R, Muratore A, et al. (2004) Extensive resections for colorectal liver metastases. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 11:92–96PubMedCrossRef Ferrero A, Polastri R, Muratore A, et al. (2004) Extensive resections for colorectal liver metastases. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 11:92–96PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Shoup M, Gonen M, D’Angelica M, et al. (2003) Volumetric analysis predicts hepatic dysfunction in patients undergoing major liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg 7:325–330PubMedCrossRef Shoup M, Gonen M, D’Angelica M, et al. (2003) Volumetric analysis predicts hepatic dysfunction in patients undergoing major liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg 7:325–330PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Vauthey JN, Baer HU, Guastella T, et al. (1993) Comparison of outcome between extended and nonextended liver resections for neoplasms. Surgery 114:968–975PubMed Vauthey JN, Baer HU, Guastella T, et al. (1993) Comparison of outcome between extended and nonextended liver resections for neoplasms. Surgery 114:968–975PubMed
9.
go back to reference Imamura H, Shimada R, Kubota M, et al. (1999) Preoperative portal vein embolization: an audit of 84 patients. Hepatology 29:1099–1105PubMedCrossRef Imamura H, Shimada R, Kubota M, et al. (1999) Preoperative portal vein embolization: an audit of 84 patients. Hepatology 29:1099–1105PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Abdalla EK, Hicks ME, Vauthey JN. (2001) Portal vein embolization: rationale, technique, future prospects. Br J Surg 88:165–175PubMedCrossRef Abdalla EK, Hicks ME, Vauthey JN. (2001) Portal vein embolization: rationale, technique, future prospects. Br J Surg 88:165–175PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Imamura H, Seyama Y, Kokudo N, et al. (2003) One thousand fifty-six hepatectomies without mortality in 8 years. Arch Surg 138:1198–1206PubMedCrossRef Imamura H, Seyama Y, Kokudo N, et al. (2003) One thousand fifty-six hepatectomies without mortality in 8 years. Arch Surg 138:1198–1206PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Capussotti L, Ferrero A, Viganò L, et al. (2006) Bile leakage and liver resection: where is the risk? Arch Surg 141:690–694PubMedCrossRef Capussotti L, Ferrero A, Viganò L, et al. (2006) Bile leakage and liver resection: where is the risk? Arch Surg 141:690–694PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rubbia-Brandt L, Audard V, Sartoretti P, et al. (2004) Severe hepatic sinusoidal obstruction associated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 15:460–466PubMedCrossRef Rubbia-Brandt L, Audard V, Sartoretti P, et al. (2004) Severe hepatic sinusoidal obstruction associated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 15:460–466PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Karoui M, Penna C, Amin-Hashem M, et al. (2006) Influence of preoperative chemotherapy on the risk of major hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg 243:1–7PubMedCrossRef Karoui M, Penna C, Amin-Hashem M, et al. (2006) Influence of preoperative chemotherapy on the risk of major hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg 243:1–7PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Vauthey JN, Pawlik TM, Ribero D, et al. (2006) Chemotherapy regimen predicts steatohepatitis and an increase in 90-day mortality after surgery for hepatic colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol. 24:2065–2072PubMedCrossRef Vauthey JN, Pawlik TM, Ribero D, et al. (2006) Chemotherapy regimen predicts steatohepatitis and an increase in 90-day mortality after surgery for hepatic colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol. 24:2065–2072PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Belghiti J, Hiramatsu K, Benoist S, et al. (2000) Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection. J Am Coll Surg 191:38–46PubMedCrossRef Belghiti J, Hiramatsu K, Benoist S, et al. (2000) Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection. J Am Coll Surg 191:38–46PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference The Brisbane 2000 Terminology of Liver Anatomy and Resection. (2000) Terminology Committee of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association. HPB 2:333–339 The Brisbane 2000 Terminology of Liver Anatomy and Resection. (2000) Terminology Committee of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association. HPB 2:333–339
18.
go back to reference Wakabayashi H, Ishimura K, Okano K, et al. (2002) Application of preoperative portal vein embolization before major hepatic resection in patients with normal or abnormal liver parenchyma. Surgery 131:26–33PubMedCrossRef Wakabayashi H, Ishimura K, Okano K, et al. (2002) Application of preoperative portal vein embolization before major hepatic resection in patients with normal or abnormal liver parenchyma. Surgery 131:26–33PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Azoulay D, Castaing D, Smail A, et al. (2000) Resection of nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after percutaneous portal vein embolization. Ann Surg 231:480–486PubMedCrossRef Azoulay D, Castaing D, Smail A, et al. (2000) Resection of nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after percutaneous portal vein embolization. Ann Surg 231:480–486PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Suc B, Panis Y, Belghiti J, et al. (1992) ‘Natural history’ of hepatectomy. Br J Surg 79:39–42PubMedCrossRef Suc B, Panis Y, Belghiti J, et al. (1992) ‘Natural history’ of hepatectomy. Br J Surg 79:39–42PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Vauthey JN, Chaoui A, Do KA, et al. (2000) Standardized measurement of the future liver remnant prior to extended liver resection: methodology and clinical associations. Surgery 127:512–519PubMedCrossRef Vauthey JN, Chaoui A, Do KA, et al. (2000) Standardized measurement of the future liver remnant prior to extended liver resection: methodology and clinical associations. Surgery 127:512–519PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Yigitler C, Farges O, Kianmanesh R, et al. (2003) The small remnant liver after major liver resection: how common and how relevant? Liver Transpl 9:S18–25PubMedCrossRef Yigitler C, Farges O, Kianmanesh R, et al. (2003) The small remnant liver after major liver resection: how common and how relevant? Liver Transpl 9:S18–25PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Matsumata T, Kanematsu T, Okudaira Y, et al. (1987) Postoperative mechanical ventilation preventing the occurrence of pleural effusion after hepatectomy. Surgery 102:493–497PubMed Matsumata T, Kanematsu T, Okudaira Y, et al. (1987) Postoperative mechanical ventilation preventing the occurrence of pleural effusion after hepatectomy. Surgery 102:493–497PubMed
24.
go back to reference Nagano Y, Togo S, Tanaka K, et al. (2003) Risk factors and management of bile leakage after hepatic resection. World J Surg 27:695–698PubMedCrossRef Nagano Y, Togo S, Tanaka K, et al. (2003) Risk factors and management of bile leakage after hepatic resection. World J Surg 27:695–698PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Takeda K, Togo S, Kunihiro O, et al. (2002) Clinicohistological features of liver failure after excessive hepatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 49:354–358PubMed Takeda K, Togo S, Kunihiro O, et al. (2002) Clinicohistological features of liver failure after excessive hepatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 49:354–358PubMed
26.
go back to reference Schindl MJ, Millar AM, Redhead DN, et al. (2006) The adaptive response of the reticuloendothelial system to major liver resection in humans. Ann Surg 243:507–514PubMedCrossRef Schindl MJ, Millar AM, Redhead DN, et al. (2006) The adaptive response of the reticuloendothelial system to major liver resection in humans. Ann Surg 243:507–514PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Di Stefano DR, de Baere T, Denys A, et al. (2005) Preoperative percutaneous portal vein embolization: evaluation of adverse events in 188 patients. Radiology 234:625–630PubMedCrossRef Di Stefano DR, de Baere T, Denys A, et al. (2005) Preoperative percutaneous portal vein embolization: evaluation of adverse events in 188 patients. Radiology 234:625–630PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kodama Y, Shimizu T, Endo H, et al. (2002) Complications of percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13:1233–1237PubMedCrossRef Kodama Y, Shimizu T, Endo H, et al. (2002) Complications of percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13:1233–1237PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Schindl MJ, Redhead DN, Fearon KC, et al. (2005) The value of residual liver volume as a predictor of hepatic dysfunction and infection after major liver resection. Gut 54:289–296PubMedCrossRef Schindl MJ, Redhead DN, Fearon KC, et al. (2005) The value of residual liver volume as a predictor of hepatic dysfunction and infection after major liver resection. Gut 54:289–296PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Postoperative Liver Dysfunction and Future Remnant Liver: Where Is the Limit?
Results of a Prospective Study
Authors
Alessandro Ferrero
Luca Viganò
Roberto Polastri
Andrea Muratore
Haris Eminefendic
Daniele Regge
Lorenzo Capussotti
Publication date
01-08-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 8/2007
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9123-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2007

World Journal of Surgery 8/2007 Go to the issue