Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2005

01-05-2005

How to Appraise a Prognostic Study

Authors: Kenneth Mak, F.R.C.S., Cheng Kiong Kum, F.R.C.S.

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 5/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Prognostic studies are studies that examine selected predictive variables or risk factors and assess their influence on the outcome of a disease. They allow clinicians to understand better the natural history of a disease, guide clinical decision-making by facilitating the selection of appropriate treatment options, and allow more accurate prediction of disease outcomes. Appraising prognostic studies involves determining the internal validity of the study design and evaluating the influence of systemic errors or bias. In studies examining multiple prognostic variables, care must be taken to minimize the confounding influence each variable would have on the other parameters. Evaluating the results of appropriate statistical analysis enables conclusions to be made that may influence clinical practice. Care must be taken to ensure that the conditions under which the prognostic study were conducted resemble circumstances in the local institution so as to allow the conclusions to be applied to local practices.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Altman, DG 2001Systemic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variablesB. M. J323224228 Altman, DG 2001Systemic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variablesB. M. J323224228
2.
go back to reference Ranson, JC, Rifkin, KM, Roses, DF, et al. 1974Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitisSurg. Gynecol. Obstet1396981PubMed Ranson, JC, Rifkin, KM, Roses, DF,  et al. 1974Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitisSurg. Gynecol. Obstet1396981PubMed
3.
go back to reference Larvin, M, McMahon, M 1989APACHE-II score for the assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitisLancet2201205CrossRefPubMed Larvin, M, McMahon, M 1989APACHE-II score for the assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitisLancet2201205CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pisanu, A, Cois, A, Uccheddu, A 2004Surgical treatment of perforated diverticular disease: evaluation of factors predicting prognosis in the elderlyInt. Surg893538PubMed Pisanu, A, Cois, A, Uccheddu, A 2004Surgical treatment of perforated diverticular disease: evaluation of factors predicting prognosis in the elderlyInt. Surg893538PubMed
5.
go back to reference Sackett, DL, Richardson, WS, Rosenberg, W, et al. 1997Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBMChurchill LivingstoneNew York Sackett, DL, Richardson, WS, Rosenberg, W,  et al. 1997Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBMChurchill LivingstoneNew York
6.
go back to reference Laupacis, A, Wells, G, Richardson, S, et al. 1994Users’ guides to the medical literature. V. How to use an article about prognosisJ. A. M. A272234237PubMed Laupacis, A, Wells, G, Richardson, S,  et al. 1994Users’ guides to the medical literature. V. How to use an article about prognosisJ. A. M. A272234237PubMed
7.
go back to reference Juni, P, Altman, DG, Egger, M 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trialsB. M. J3234246 Juni, P, Altman, DG, Egger, M 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trialsB. M. J3234246
8.
go back to reference Acalovschi, M, Blendea, D, Feier, C 2003Risk factors for symptomatic gallstones in patients with liver cirrhosis: a case-control studyAm. J. Gastroenterol9818561860PubMed Acalovschi, M, Blendea, D, Feier, C 2003Risk factors for symptomatic gallstones in patients with liver cirrhosis: a case-control studyAm. J. Gastroenterol9818561860PubMed
9.
go back to reference Memon, MA, Cooper, NJ, Memom, B, et al. 2003Meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairBr. J. Surg9014791492CrossRefPubMed Memon, MA, Cooper, NJ, Memom, B,  et al. 2003Meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairBr. J. Surg9014791492CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Czechowski, A, Schafmayer, A. 2003TAPP versus TEP: a retrospective analysis 5 years after laparoscopic transperitoneal and total endoscopic extraperitoneal repair in inguinal and femoral herniaChirurg7411431149CrossRefPubMed Czechowski, A, Schafmayer, A. 2003TAPP versus TEP: a retrospective analysis 5 years after laparoscopic transperitoneal and total endoscopic extraperitoneal repair in inguinal and femoral herniaChirurg7411431149CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lilford, R, Braunholtz, D, Harris, J, et al. 2004Trials in surgeryBr. J. Surg91616CrossRefPubMed Lilford, R, Braunholtz, D, Harris, J,  et al. 2004Trials in surgeryBr. J. Surg91616CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gouma, DJ, Geenen, RC, Gulik, TM, et al. 2000Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volumeAnn. Surg232786795CrossRefPubMed Gouma, DJ, Geenen, RC, Gulik, TM,  et al. 2000Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volumeAnn. Surg232786795CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ueno, H, Mochizuki, H, Hashiguchi, Y, et al. 2004Predictors of extrahepatic recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastasesBr. J. Surg91327333CrossRefPubMed Ueno, H, Mochizuki, H, Hashiguchi, Y,  et al. 2004Predictors of extrahepatic recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastasesBr. J. Surg91327333CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gardner, MJ, Altman, DG 1986Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testingB. M. J292746750 Gardner, MJ, Altman, DG 1986Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testingB. M. J292746750
16.
go back to reference Ranson, HJC 1979The timing of biliary surgery in acute pancreatitisAnn. Surg189654662PubMed Ranson, HJC 1979The timing of biliary surgery in acute pancreatitisAnn. Surg189654662PubMed
Metadata
Title
How to Appraise a Prognostic Study
Authors
Kenneth Mak, F.R.C.S.
Cheng Kiong Kum, F.R.C.S.
Publication date
01-05-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 5/2005
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7914-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2005

World Journal of Surgery 5/2005 Go to the issue