Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2005

01-09-2005

A New Approach to Accurate Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

Authors: Nikolaos E. Tzanakis, M.D., Stamatis P. Efstathiou, M.D., Kecaris Danulidis, M.D., Georgios E. Rallis, M.D., Dimitrios I. Tsioulos, M.D., Anthimos Chatzivasiliou, M.D., Georgios Peros, M.D., Nikolaos I. Nikiteas, M.D.

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 9/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

This study aimed (1) to develop a simple scoring system incorporating ultrasound (US) examination and clinical or laboratory predictors for increasing diagnostic accuracy in acute appendicitis (AA), and (2) to evaluate the performance of the scoring system as compared to that of previous models. Fifteen variables including US assessment for patients admitted with suspected AA were considered in multivariate analysis using the finding of AA at operation as the end point (internal study). The new score, together with 11 previous ones, was applied to a prospective independent population of subjects with suspected AA, and the respective performances were compared (external validation study). Among 303 patients (170 males, mean age 28.3 ± 13.3 years) of the internal study, 161 went on to surgery, and 130 had AA at operation. Four independent correlates of AA were identified and used for the derivation of the following integer-based scoring system: number of points = 6 for US demonstrating AA + 4 for tenderness in the right lower quadrant + 3 for rebound tenderness + 2 for leukocyte count >12,000/μl. In the external study (201 subjects, 105 males, mean age 28.7 ± 11.9 years, 109 operated, 87 with AA), when the cut-off of ≥ 8 points for AA was used, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve of the proposed score were 95.4%, 97.4%, 96.5%, and 93%, respectively, exceeding noticeably the previous models. The proposed scoring system introduces a quantitative combination of the clinical evaluation with US imaging and a marker of inflammatory response, which may enhance the diagnostic accuracy for subjects with suspected AA especially in geographical areas where CT scanning is not readily available on a 24-hour basis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Andersson RE. Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br. J. Surg. 2004;91:28–37CrossRefPubMed Andersson RE. Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br. J. Surg. 2004;91:28–37CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Van Way CW 3rd, Murphy JR, Dunn EL, et al. A feasibility study of computer aided diagnosis in appendicitis. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1982;155:685–688PubMed Van Way CW 3rd, Murphy JR, Dunn EL, et al. A feasibility study of computer aided diagnosis in appendicitis. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1982;155:685–688PubMed
3.
go back to reference Teicher I, Landa B, Cohen M, et al. Scoring system to aid in diagnoses of appendicitis. Ann. Surg. 1983;198:753–759PubMed Teicher I, Landa B, Cohen M, et al. Scoring system to aid in diagnoses of appendicitis. Ann. Surg. 1983;198:753–759PubMed
4.
go back to reference Arnbjörnsson E. Scoring system for computer-aided diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The value of prospective versus retrospective studies. Ann. Chir. Gynaecol. 1985;74:159–166PubMed Arnbjörnsson E. Scoring system for computer-aided diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The value of prospective versus retrospective studies. Ann. Chir. Gynaecol. 1985;74:159–166PubMed
5.
go back to reference Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1986;15:557–564CrossRefPubMed Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1986;15:557–564CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fenyö G. Routine use of a scoring system for decision-making in suspected acute appendicitis in adults. Acta Chir. Scand. 1987;153:545–551PubMed Fenyö G. Routine use of a scoring system for decision-making in suspected acute appendicitis in adults. Acta Chir. Scand. 1987;153:545–551PubMed
7.
go back to reference Lindberg G, Feny G. Algorithmic diagnosis of appendicitis using Bayes’ theorem and logistic regression. In Bernardo JM, DeGroot MH, Lindley DV, Smith AF, editors. Bayesian Statistics 3, Oxford University Press, 1988, pp 665–668 Lindberg G, Feny G. Algorithmic diagnosis of appendicitis using Bayes’ theorem and logistic regression. In Bernardo JM, DeGroot MH, Lindley DV, Smith AF, editors. Bayesian Statistics 3, Oxford University Press, 1988, pp 665–668
8.
go back to reference Izbicki JR, Wilker DK, Mandelkow HK, et al. Retro- and prospective studies on the value of clinical and laboratory chemical data in acute appendicitis. Chirurg 1990;61:887–894PubMed Izbicki JR, Wilker DK, Mandelkow HK, et al. Retro- and prospective studies on the value of clinical and laboratory chemical data in acute appendicitis. Chirurg 1990;61:887–894PubMed
9.
go back to reference de Dombal FT. Diagnosis of Acute Abdominal Pain. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, l991;105–106 de Dombal FT. Diagnosis of Acute Abdominal Pain. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, l991;105–106
10.
go back to reference Christian F, Christian GP. A simple scoring system to reduce the negative appendectomy rate. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1992;74:281–285PubMed Christian F, Christian GP. A simple scoring system to reduce the negative appendectomy rate. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1992;74:281–285PubMed
11.
go back to reference Eskelinen M, Ikonen J, Lipponen P. A computer-based diagnostic score to aid in diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study of 1333 patients with acute abdominal pain. Theor. Surg. 1992;7:86–90 Eskelinen M, Ikonen J, Lipponen P. A computer-based diagnostic score to aid in diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study of 1333 patients with acute abdominal pain. Theor. Surg. 1992;7:86–90
12.
go back to reference Ohmann C, Franke C, Yang Q, et al. Diagnostic score for acute appendicitis. Chirurg 1995;66:135–141PubMed Ohmann C, Franke C, Yang Q, et al. Diagnostic score for acute appendicitis. Chirurg 1995;66:135–141PubMed
13.
go back to reference Hoffmann J, Rasmussen OO. Aids in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br. J. Surg. 1989;76:774–779PubMed Hoffmann J, Rasmussen OO. Aids in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br. J. Surg. 1989;76:774–779PubMed
14.
go back to reference Kalan M, Talbot D, Cunliffe WJ, et al. Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1994;76:418–419PubMed Kalan M, Talbot D, Cunliffe WJ, et al. Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1994;76:418–419PubMed
15.
go back to reference Ohmann C, Yang Q, Franke C. Diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis. Abdominal Pain Study Group. Eur. J. Surg. 1995;161:273–281PubMed Ohmann C, Yang Q, Franke C. Diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis. Abdominal Pain Study Group. Eur. J. Surg. 1995;161:273–281PubMed
16.
go back to reference Ohmann C, Franke C, Yang Q. Clinical benefit of a diagnostic score for appendicitis: results of a prospective interventional study. German Study Group of Acute Abdominal Pain. Arch. Surg. 1999;134:993–996CrossRef Ohmann C, Franke C, Yang Q. Clinical benefit of a diagnostic score for appendicitis: results of a prospective interventional study. German Study Group of Acute Abdominal Pain. Arch. Surg. 1999;134:993–996CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sitter H, Hoffmann S, Hassan I, et al. Diagnostic score in appendicitis. Validation of a diagnostic score (Eskelinen score) in patients in whom acute appendicitis is suspected. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2004;389:213–218 Sitter H, Hoffmann S, Hassan I, et al. Diagnostic score in appendicitis. Validation of a diagnostic score (Eskelinen score) in patients in whom acute appendicitis is suspected. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2004;389:213–218
18.
go back to reference Orr RK, Porter D, Hartman D. Ultrasonography to evaluate adults for appendicitis: decision making based on meta-analysis and probabilistic reasoning. Acad. Emerg. Med. 1995;2:644–650PubMed Orr RK, Porter D, Hartman D. Ultrasonography to evaluate adults for appendicitis: decision making based on meta-analysis and probabilistic reasoning. Acad. Emerg. Med. 1995;2:644–650PubMed
19.
go back to reference Franke C, Bohner H, Yang Q, et al. Ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis: results of a prospective multicenter trial. Acute Abdominal Pain Study Group. World J. Surg. 1999;23:141–146PubMed Franke C, Bohner H, Yang Q, et al. Ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis: results of a prospective multicenter trial. Acute Abdominal Pain Study Group. World J. Surg. 1999;23:141–146PubMed
20.
go back to reference Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Gritzmann N, et al. Appendicitis: should diagnostic imaging be performed if the clinical presentation is highly suggestive of the disease? Gastroenterology 2002;123:992–998CrossRefPubMed Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Gritzmann N, et al. Appendicitis: should diagnostic imaging be performed if the clinical presentation is highly suggestive of the disease? Gastroenterology 2002;123:992–998CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Wade DS, Marrow SE, Balsara ZN, et al. Accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with the surgeon’s clinical impression. Arch. Surg. 1993;128:1039–1046PubMed Wade DS, Marrow SE, Balsara ZN, et al. Accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with the surgeon’s clinical impression. Arch. Surg. 1993;128:1039–1046PubMed
22.
go back to reference Zielke A, Hasse C, Sitter H, et al. Influence of ultrasound on clinical decision making in acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Eur. J. Surg. 1998;164:201–209CrossRefPubMed Zielke A, Hasse C, Sitter H, et al. Influence of ultrasound on clinical decision making in acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Eur. J. Surg. 1998;164:201–209CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology 2000;215:337–348PubMed Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology 2000;215:337–348PubMed
24.
go back to reference Lee SL, Walsh AJ, Ho HS. Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch. Surg. 2001;136:556–562CrossRefPubMed Lee SL, Walsh AJ, Ho HS. Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch. Surg. 2001;136:556–562CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Stephens PL, Mazzucco JJ. Comparison of ultrasound and the Alvarado score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Conn. Med. 1999;63:137–140PubMed Stephens PL, Mazzucco JJ. Comparison of ultrasound and the Alvarado score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Conn. Med. 1999;63:137–140PubMed
26.
go back to reference Obermaier R, Benz S, Asgharnia M, et al. Value of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: interesting aspects. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2003;8:451–456PubMed Obermaier R, Benz S, Asgharnia M, et al. Value of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: interesting aspects. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2003;8:451–456PubMed
27.
go back to reference Puig S, Hormann M, Rebhandl W, et al. US as a primary diagnostic tool in relation to negative appendectomy: six years experience. Radiology 2003;226:101–104PubMed Puig S, Hormann M, Rebhandl W, et al. US as a primary diagnostic tool in relation to negative appendectomy: six years experience. Radiology 2003;226:101–104PubMed
28.
go back to reference Bendeck SE, Nino-Murcia M, Berry GJ, et al. Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Radiology 2002;225:131–136PubMed Bendeck SE, Nino-Murcia M, Berry GJ, et al. Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Radiology 2002;225:131–136PubMed
29.
go back to reference Lim HK, Bae SH, Seo GS. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women: value of sonography. A.J.R. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1992;159:539–542 Lim HK, Bae SH, Seo GS. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women: value of sonography. A.J.R. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1992;159:539–542
30.
go back to reference Chesbrough RM, Burkhard TK, Balsara ZN, et al. Self-localization in US of appendicitis: an addition to graded compression. Radiology 1993;187:349–351PubMed Chesbrough RM, Burkhard TK, Balsara ZN, et al. Self-localization in US of appendicitis: an addition to graded compression. Radiology 1993;187:349–351PubMed
31.
go back to reference Amgwerd M, Rothlin M, Candinas D, et al. Ultrasound diagnosis of appendicitis by surgeons: a matter of experience? A prospective study. Langenbecks Arch. Chir. 1994;379:335–340CrossRefPubMed Amgwerd M, Rothlin M, Candinas D, et al. Ultrasound diagnosis of appendicitis by surgeons: a matter of experience? A prospective study. Langenbecks Arch. Chir. 1994;379:335–340CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, et al. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998;338:141–146CrossRefPubMed Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, et al. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998;338:141–146CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Pickuth D, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Spielmann RP. Suspected acute appendicitis: is ultrasonography or computed tomography the preferred imaging technique? Eur. J. Surg. 2000;166:315–319CrossRefPubMed Pickuth D, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Spielmann RP. Suspected acute appendicitis: is ultrasonography or computed tomography the preferred imaging technique? Eur. J. Surg. 2000;166:315–319CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Wise SW, Labuski MR, Kasales CJ, et al. Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging. A.J.R. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001;176:933–941 Wise SW, Labuski MR, Kasales CJ, et al. Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging. A.J.R. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001;176:933–941
35.
go back to reference Terasawa T, Blackmore CC, Bent S, et al. Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Ann. Intern. Med. 2004;141:537–546PubMed Terasawa T, Blackmore CC, Bent S, et al. Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Ann. Intern. Med. 2004;141:537–546PubMed
36.
go back to reference Schuler JG, Shortsleeve MJ, Goldenson RS, et al. Is there a role for abdominal computed tomographic scans in appendicitis? Arch. Surg. 1998;133:373–376 Schuler JG, Shortsleeve MJ, Goldenson RS, et al. Is there a role for abdominal computed tomographic scans in appendicitis? Arch. Surg. 1998;133:373–376
37.
go back to reference Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW, et al. Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann. Surg. 1999;229:344–349CrossRefPubMed Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW, et al. Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann. Surg. 1999;229:344–349CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Jones K, Pena AA, Dunn EL, et al. Are negative appendectomies still acceptable? Am. J. Surg. 2004;188:748–754CrossRef Jones K, Pena AA, Dunn EL, et al. Are negative appendectomies still acceptable? Am. J. Surg. 2004;188:748–754CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A New Approach to Accurate Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
Authors
Nikolaos E. Tzanakis, M.D.
Stamatis P. Efstathiou, M.D.
Kecaris Danulidis, M.D.
Georgios E. Rallis, M.D.
Dimitrios I. Tsioulos, M.D.
Anthimos Chatzivasiliou, M.D.
Georgios Peros, M.D.
Nikolaos I. Nikiteas, M.D.
Publication date
01-09-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 9/2005
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7853-6

Other articles of this Issue 9/2005

World Journal of Surgery 9/2005 Go to the issue