Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2006

01-07-2006

Preoperative Enteral Immunonutrition Improves Postoperative Outcome in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer

Authors: Jianmin Xu, Yunshi Zhong, Dayong Jing, Zhaohan Wu

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 7/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of preoperative immunonutrition pharmaceutics (IMPACT) diet versus standard enteral nutrition (EN) on the nutritional status and immunity of patients with colorectal or gastrointestinal (GI) cancer and to evaluate whether it influences the incidence of postoperative complication.

Methods

Sixty patients with GI cancer were randomly divided into 2 groups, immunonutrition (IM) and control diet (CT), each of which was fed with IMPACT and conventional diet, respectively, for 7 days before surgical procedures. Variables of nutritional status and immunity, postoperative complications, infections, and the days of postoperative hospitalization were measured.

Results

There were no significant differences in the immunological and nutritional variables between the 2 groups preoperatively. The incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower and the days of postoperative hospitalization were significantly decreased in the IM group. Serum concentrations of both prealbumin (PALB) and transferrin (TRF) were lower in the IM than in the CT group on postoperative day 3 (P < 0.01). TRF continued to be significantly lower in the CT group than in the IM group between day 4 and day 7. However, PALB was significantly lower than before operation in the IM group on postoperative day 3 and TRF was significantly higher in the IM than the CT group on postoperative day 3 (P < 0.05). Both PALB and TRF were significantly higher in the IM than the CT group on postoperative day 7 (P < 0.05). Postoperative immunoglobulin G (IgG) level in the IM group was higher than that in the CT group (13.35 ± 2.06 g/l vs. 9.59 ± 2.23 g/l, P < 0.05). CD4/CD8 ratio was significantly higher in the IM group (2.10 ± 0.51 vs. 1.62 ± 0.52, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Preoperative enteral IM in patients with GI cancer improves nutritional status and immunity and decreases the incidence of postoperative complications and infections.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chang HR, Bistrian B. The role of cytokines in the catabolic consequences of infection and injury. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1998;22:156–166PubMedCrossRef Chang HR, Bistrian B. The role of cytokines in the catabolic consequences of infection and injury. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1998;22:156–166PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference Bozzetti F, Braga M, Gianotti L, et al. Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicenter trial. Lancet 2001;358:1487–1492PubMedCrossRef Bozzetti F, Braga M, Gianotti L, et al. Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicenter trial. Lancet 2001;358:1487–1492PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Braga M, et al. Preoperative oral arginine and n−3 fatty acid supplementation improves the immunometabolic host response and outcome after colorectal resection for cancer. Surgery 2002;132(5):805–814PubMedCrossRef Braga M, et al. Preoperative oral arginine and n−3 fatty acid supplementation improves the immunometabolic host response and outcome after colorectal resection for cancer. Surgery 2002;132(5):805–814PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Karen CM, Bruce RB. Immunonutrition: problematic or problem solving. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:764–770 Karen CM, Bruce RB. Immunonutrition: problematic or problem solving. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:764–770
6.
go back to reference Farreras N, Artigas V, Cardona D, et al. Effect of early postoperative enteral immunonutrition on wound healing in patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer. Clin Nutr 2005;24(1):55–65PubMedCrossRef Farreras N, Artigas V, Cardona D, et al. Effect of early postoperative enteral immunonutrition on wound healing in patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer. Clin Nutr 2005;24(1):55–65PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Atkinson S, Sieffiert E, Bihari D. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial of enteral immunonutrition in the critically ill. Guy’s Hospital Intensive Care Group. Crit Care Med 1998;26:1164–1172PubMedCrossRef Atkinson S, Sieffiert E, Bihari D. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial of enteral immunonutrition in the critically ill. Guy’s Hospital Intensive Care Group. Crit Care Med 1998;26:1164–1172PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Braga M, Gianotti L, Radaelli G, et al. Perioperative immunonutrition in patients undergoing cancer surgery: results of a randomized double-blind phase 3 trial. Arch Surg 1999;134:428–433PubMedCrossRef Braga M, Gianotti L, Radaelli G, et al. Perioperative immunonutrition in patients undergoing cancer surgery: results of a randomized double-blind phase 3 trial. Arch Surg 1999;134:428–433PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Daly JM, Lieberman MD, Goldfine J, et al. Enteral nutrition with supplemental arginine, RNA, and omega-3 fatty acids in patients after operation: immunologic, metabolic and clinical outcome. Surgery 1992;112:56–67PubMed Daly JM, Lieberman MD, Goldfine J, et al. Enteral nutrition with supplemental arginine, RNA, and omega-3 fatty acids in patients after operation: immunologic, metabolic and clinical outcome. Surgery 1992;112:56–67PubMed
10.
go back to reference Senkal M, Zumtobel V, Bauer KH, et al. Outcome and cost-effectiveness of perioperative enteral immunonutrition in patients undergoing elective upper gastrointestinal tract surgery: a prospective randomized study. Arch Surg 1999;134:1309–1316PubMedCrossRef Senkal M, Zumtobel V, Bauer KH, et al. Outcome and cost-effectiveness of perioperative enteral immunonutrition in patients undergoing elective upper gastrointestinal tract surgery: a prospective randomized study. Arch Surg 1999;134:1309–1316PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gianotti L, Braga M, Gentilini O, et al. Artificial nutrition after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreas 2000;21:344–351PubMedCrossRef Gianotti L, Braga M, Gentilini O, et al. Artificial nutrition after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreas 2000;21:344–351PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Van der Hulst RRW, et al. Glutamine and the prevention of gut integrity. Lancet 1993;341:1363–1365PubMedCrossRef Van der Hulst RRW, et al. Glutamine and the prevention of gut integrity. Lancet 1993;341:1363–1365PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kudsk KA, Croce MA, Fabian TC, et al. Enteral versus parenteral feeding: effect on septic morbidity after blunt and penetrating trauma. Ann Surg 1992;215:503–513PubMed Kudsk KA, Croce MA, Fabian TC, et al. Enteral versus parenteral feeding: effect on septic morbidity after blunt and penetrating trauma. Ann Surg 1992;215:503–513PubMed
14.
go back to reference Daly JM, Reynolds J, Thom A, et al. Immune and metabolic effects of arginine in the surgical patient. Ann Surg 1988;208:512–523PubMed Daly JM, Reynolds J, Thom A, et al. Immune and metabolic effects of arginine in the surgical patient. Ann Surg 1988;208:512–523PubMed
15.
go back to reference Billiar TR, Bankey PE, Svingen BA, et al. Fatty acid intake and Kupffer cell function: fish oil alters eicosanoid and monokine production to endotoxin stimulation. Surgery 1988;104(2):343–349PubMed Billiar TR, Bankey PE, Svingen BA, et al. Fatty acid intake and Kupffer cell function: fish oil alters eicosanoid and monokine production to endotoxin stimulation. Surgery 1988;104(2):343–349PubMed
Metadata
Title
Preoperative Enteral Immunonutrition Improves Postoperative Outcome in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer
Authors
Jianmin Xu
Yunshi Zhong
Dayong Jing
Zhaohan Wu
Publication date
01-07-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 7/2006
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0756-8

Other articles of this Issue 7/2006

World Journal of Surgery 7/2006 Go to the issue