Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2006

01-08-2006

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer: Prospective Evaluation of Laparoscopic Gastric Mobilization

Authors: Gaelle Godiris-Petit, MD, Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand, MD, Isabelle Honigman, MD, Pierre Cattan, MD, PhD, Emile Sarfati, MD PhD

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 8/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Esophagectomy carries high morbidity, mainly respiratory. Minimally invasive surgery has been demonstrated to improve postoperative outcome in digestive surgery, without impairment of oncological results. A prospective study was conducted to evaluate feasibility, postoperative outcome, and mid-term oncological results of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in cancer.

Methods

From July 2001 to August 2005, 25 patients underwent esophagectomy with laparoscopic gastric mobilization (LGM) for epidermoid carcinoma (n = 15) or adenocarcinoma (n = 10). Tumors were located on the cardia (n = 6), on the lower third (n = 14), or on the median third (n = 5) of the esophagus. Following LGM, transthoracic esophagectomy was performed.

Results

Complete LGM was achieved in all patients but 1. Mean operative time for LGM was 191 ± 49 minutes. Fifteen patients (60%) developed complications, mainly respiratory. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 2 patients, with a favorable outcome. Pylorospasm (n = 1) was the only intra-abdominal complication. Median hospital stay was 18 days. Two patients died (8%). Twenty-three patients underwent R0 resection. A mean of 12 ± 4 lymph nodes (range 4–19 nodes) were analyzed. With a mean follow-up of 14 months (1–46 months), actuarial survival at 1 and 2 years was, respectively, 73% and 56%.

Conclusion

Esophagectomy with LGM is feasible with few specific complications. However, no decrease in morbidity and hospital stay could be observed. Mid-term oncological results seem comparable to those of conventional surgery. Further studies are required to evaluate the extent of lymphadenectomy and the oncologic safety of MIE.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 2002;236:759–766PubMedCrossRef Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 2002;236:759–766PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2050–2059CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2050–2059CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 2005;241:232–237PubMedCrossRef Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 2005;241:232–237PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ackroyd R, Watson DI, Majeed AW, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication for gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 2004;91:975–982PubMedCrossRef Ackroyd R, Watson DI, Majeed AW, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication for gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 2004;91:975–982PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Patti MG, Fisichella PM, Perretta S, et al. Impact of minimally invasive surgery on the treatment of esophageal achalasia: a decade of change. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196:698–703PubMedCrossRef Patti MG, Fisichella PM, Perretta S, et al. Impact of minimally invasive surgery on the treatment of esophageal achalasia: a decade of change. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196:698–703PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Griffin SM, Shaw IH, Dresner SM. Early complications after Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy: risk factors and management. J Am Coll Surg 2002;194:285–297PubMedCrossRef Griffin SM, Shaw IH, Dresner SM. Early complications after Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy: risk factors and management. J Am Coll Surg 2002;194:285–297PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Karl RC, Schreiber R, Boulware D, et al. Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Ann Surg 2000;231:635–643PubMedCrossRef Karl RC, Schreiber R, Boulware D, et al. Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Ann Surg 2000;231:635–643PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bailey SH, Bull DA, Harpole DH, et al. Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:217–222PubMedCrossRef Bailey SH, Bull DA, Harpole DH, et al. Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:217–222PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Earlam R, Cunha-Melo JR. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. I. A critical review of surgery. Br J Surg 1980;67:381–390PubMed Earlam R, Cunha-Melo JR. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. I. A critical review of surgery. Br J Surg 1980;67:381–390PubMed
12.
go back to reference Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1662–1669PubMedCrossRef Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1662–1669PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:306–313PubMedCrossRef Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:306–313PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gossot D, Fritsch S, Halimi B, et al. Can a reduction of morbidity of esophagectomy be expected with the thoracoscopic approach? Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1995;19:176–181PubMed Gossot D, Fritsch S, Halimi B, et al. Can a reduction of morbidity of esophagectomy be expected with the thoracoscopic approach? Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1995;19:176–181PubMed
15.
go back to reference Gossot D, Fourquier P, Celerier M. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy: technique and initial results. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:667–670PubMedCrossRef Gossot D, Fourquier P, Celerier M. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy: technique and initial results. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:667–670PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 2003;238:486–494PubMed Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 2003;238:486–494PubMed
17.
go back to reference Luketich JD, Schauer PR, Christie NA, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:906–911PubMedCrossRef Luketich JD, Schauer PR, Christie NA, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:906–911PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Schauer PR, Luketich JD. Combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approach to esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg 1999;188:328–332PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Schauer PR, Luketich JD. Combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approach to esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg 1999;188:328–332PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg 2000;135:920–925PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg 2000;135:920–925PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, et al. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 2003;90:108–113PubMedCrossRef Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, et al. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 2003;90:108–113PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Roberts P, Follette DM, et al. Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease: lessons learned from 46 consecutive procedures. J Am Coll Surg 2003;197:902–913PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Roberts P, Follette DM, et al. Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease: lessons learned from 46 consecutive procedures. J Am Coll Surg 2003;197:902–913PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Siewert JR, Feith M, Werner M, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: results of surgical therapy based on anatomical/topographic classification in 1002 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2000;232:353–361.CrossRef Siewert JR, Feith M, Werner M, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: results of surgical therapy based on anatomical/topographic classification in 1002 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2000;232:353–361.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Jagot P, Sauvanet A, Berthoux L, et al. Laparoscopic mobilization of the stomach for esophageal replacement. Br J Surg 1996;83:540–542PubMed Jagot P, Sauvanet A, Berthoux L, et al. Laparoscopic mobilization of the stomach for esophageal replacement. Br J Surg 1996;83:540–542PubMed
24.
go back to reference Urschel JD, Blewett CJ, Young JE, et al. Pyloric drainage (pyloroplasty) or no drainage in gastric reconstruction after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dig Surg 2002;19:160–164PubMedCrossRef Urschel JD, Blewett CJ, Young JE, et al. Pyloric drainage (pyloroplasty) or no drainage in gastric reconstruction after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dig Surg 2002;19:160–164PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg 1999;230:392–400PubMedCrossRef Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg 1999;230:392–400PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Goldminc M, Maddern G, Le Prise E, et al. Oesophagectomy by a transhiatal approach or thoracotomy: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Surg 1993;80:367–370PubMed Goldminc M, Maddern G, Le Prise E, et al. Oesophagectomy by a transhiatal approach or thoracotomy: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Surg 1993;80:367–370PubMed
27.
go back to reference Nilsson G, Larsson S, Johnsson F. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication: blind evaluation of recovery and discharge period. Br J Surg 2000;87:873–878PubMedCrossRef Nilsson G, Larsson S, Johnsson F. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication: blind evaluation of recovery and discharge period. Br J Surg 2000;87:873–878PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2004;91:1111–1124PubMedCrossRef Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2004;91:1111–1124PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Collard JM. Role of videoassisted surgery in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1995;84:209–214PubMed Collard JM. Role of videoassisted surgery in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1995;84:209–214PubMed
30.
go back to reference Bosset JF, Gignoux M, Triboulet JP, et al. Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone in squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 1997;337:161–167PubMedCrossRef Bosset JF, Gignoux M, Triboulet JP, et al. Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone in squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 1997;337:161–167PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Martin DJ, Bessell JR, Chew A, et al. Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy: initial experience and outcomes. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1597–1601PubMedCrossRef Martin DJ, Bessell JR, Chew A, et al. Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy: initial experience and outcomes. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1597–1601PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Bizekis CS, Kent MS, Luketich JD, et al. Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. In: The 52nd Southern Thoracic Surgical Association Meeting, Orlando, FL, 2005, p 62 Bizekis CS, Kent MS, Luketich JD, et al. Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. In: The 52nd Southern Thoracic Surgical Association Meeting, Orlando, FL, 2005, p 62
33.
go back to reference Leibman S, Smithers BM, Gotley DC, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Short- and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2006;20:428–433PubMedCrossRef Leibman S, Smithers BM, Gotley DC, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Short- and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2006;20:428–433PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Collins G, Johnson E, Kroshus T, et al. Experience with minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2006;20:298–301PubMedCrossRef Collins G, Johnson E, Kroshus T, et al. Experience with minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2006;20:298–301PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Mariette C, Taillier G, Van Seuningen I, et al. Factors affecting postoperative course and survival after en bloc resection for esophageal carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1177–1183PubMedCrossRef Mariette C, Taillier G, Van Seuningen I, et al. Factors affecting postoperative course and survival after en bloc resection for esophageal carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1177–1183PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Rentz J, Bull D, Harpole D, et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy: a prospective study of 945 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1114–1120PubMedCrossRef Rentz J, Bull D, Harpole D, et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy: a prospective study of 945 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1114–1120PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Whooley BP, Law S, Murthy SC, et al. Analysis of reduced death and complication rates after esophageal resection. Ann Surg 2001;233:338–344PubMedCrossRef Whooley BP, Law S, Murthy SC, et al. Analysis of reduced death and complication rates after esophageal resection. Ann Surg 2001;233:338–344PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Fotiadis RJ, Badvie S, Weston MD, et al. Epidural analgesia in gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 2004;91:828–841PubMedCrossRef Fotiadis RJ, Badvie S, Weston MD, et al. Epidural analgesia in gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 2004;91:828–841PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Bozzetti F, Braga M, Gianotti L, et al. Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2001;358:1487–1492PubMedCrossRef Bozzetti F, Braga M, Gianotti L, et al. Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2001;358:1487–1492PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Gabor S, Renner H, Matzi V, et al. Early enteral feeding compared with parenteral nutrition after esophageal or oesophagogastric resection and reconstruction. Br J Nutr 2005;93:509–513PubMedCrossRef Gabor S, Renner H, Matzi V, et al. Early enteral feeding compared with parenteral nutrition after esophageal or oesophagogastric resection and reconstruction. Br J Nutr 2005;93:509–513PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer: Prospective Evaluation of Laparoscopic Gastric Mobilization
Authors
Gaelle Godiris-Petit, MD
Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand, MD
Isabelle Honigman, MD
Pierre Cattan, MD, PhD
Emile Sarfati, MD PhD
Publication date
01-08-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 8/2006
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0627-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2006

World Journal of Surgery 8/2006 Go to the issue