Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2006

01-07-2006

Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Different Circular Staplers for Mucosectomy in the Treatment of Hemorrhoids

Authors: Antonio Arroyo, PhD, Francisco Pérez-Vicente, MD, Elena Miranda, MD, Ana Sánchez, MD, Pilar Serrano, PhD, Fernando Candela, PhD, Israel Oliver, PhD, Rafael Calpena, PhD

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 7/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The main objections against circular stapled mucosectomy have been anal pain and rectal bleeding during the surgical procedure or in the immediate postoperative follow-up. To avoid these consequences, a new stapler (PPH33-03) has been developed. The aim of this trial was to compare the intraoperative and short-term postoperative morbidity of stapled mucosectomy with PPH33-01 versus PPH33-03 in the treatment of hemorrhoids.

Methods

We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing hemorrhoidectomy with PPH33-01 (group 1, n = 30) versus PPH33-03 (group 2, n = 30) for grade III–IV symptomatic hemorrhoids. For the follow-up, the patients underwent examination and proctoscopy at 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. We recorded anal pain (linear analog scale from 0 to 10), intraoperative hemorrhage, postoperative bleeding, and continence (Wexner Continence Grading Scale).

Results

Demographic and clinical features showed no differences between the two groups. More patients required suture ligation to stop anastomotic bleeding at surgery when the PPH33-01 stapler was used (15 versus 4, P < 0.05). Rectal bleeding during the first postoperative 4 weeks was similar (P > 0.05). The postoperative pain scores during the first week were similar (P > 0.05). Patients with pain on defecation were fewer in the PPH-03 group (15 versus 2, P < 0.05). Six patients from group 1 and none from group 2 (P < 0.05) had granulomas along the line of staples at the sites of the reinforcing stitches; the granulomas were associated with postoperative anal discomfort and rectal bleeding. One patient in group 1 complained of persistent pain that resolved within 3 months. Of all the intraoperative or preoperative variables analyzed, only the presence of granuloma was associated with postoperative bleeding and anal discomfort. We have not found any recurrence or incontinence during the 6-month follow-up.

Conclusions

Intraoperative bleeding along the stapled line and tenesmus or discomfort during defecation were less frequent after circular stapled mucosectomy with PPH33-03. Therefore, circular stapled mucosectomy with PPH33-03 decreases the risk of immediate complications and thus allows implantation with more safety as a day surgery procedure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000;355:782–785PubMedCrossRef Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000;355:782–785PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregon L, et al. Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1367–1374PubMedCrossRef Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregon L, et al. Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1367–1374PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, et al. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:669–674PubMedCrossRef Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, et al. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:669–674PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lehur PA, Gravie JF, Meurette G. Circular stapled anopexy for haemorrhoidal disease: results. Colorectal Dis 2001;3:374–379PubMedCrossRef Lehur PA, Gravie JF, Meurette G. Circular stapled anopexy for haemorrhoidal disease: results. Colorectal Dis 2001;3:374–379PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wilson MS, Pope V, Doran HE, et al. Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1437–1444PubMedCrossRef Wilson MS, Pope V, Doran HE, et al. Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1437–1444PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, et al. Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003;361:1437–1438PubMedCrossRef Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, et al. Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003;361:1437–1438PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Singer MA, Cintron JR, Fleshman JW, et al. Early experience with stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:367–369 Singer MA, Cintron JR, Fleshman JW, et al. Early experience with stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:367–369
8.
go back to reference Arroyo A, Pérez F, Miranda E, et al. Open versus closed day-case haemorrhoidectomy. Is there any difference? Results of a prospective randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004;4:370–373 Arroyo A, Pérez F, Miranda E, et al. Open versus closed day-case haemorrhoidectomy. Is there any difference? Results of a prospective randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004;4:370–373
10.
go back to reference Cheetam MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom PO, et al. Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000;356:730–733CrossRef Cheetam MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom PO, et al. Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000;356:730–733CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Costa D, Pérez F, Arroyo A, et al. Mucosectomía circular mecánica en la unidad de cirugía sin ingreso: ¿alternativa válida o técnica de elección?. Cir Esp 2002;3:143–147 Costa D, Pérez F, Arroyo A, et al. Mucosectomía circular mecánica en la unidad de cirugía sin ingreso: ¿alternativa válida o técnica de elección?. Cir Esp 2002;3:143–147
13.
go back to reference Mlakar B, Kosorok P. Complications and results after stapled haemorrhoidopexia as a day surgical procedure. Tech Coloproctol 2003;7:164–167PubMedCrossRef Mlakar B, Kosorok P. Complications and results after stapled haemorrhoidopexia as a day surgical procedure. Tech Coloproctol 2003;7:164–167PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Guy RJ, Ng CE, Eu KW. Stapled anoplasty for haemorrhoids: a comparison of ambulatory vs inpatient procedures. Colorectal Dis 2003;5:29–32PubMedCrossRef Guy RJ, Ng CE, Eu KW. Stapled anoplasty for haemorrhoids: a comparison of ambulatory vs inpatient procedures. Colorectal Dis 2003;5:29–32PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: new procedure. In 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery: June 3–6, Rome (Italy), 1998; p. 777–784 Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: new procedure. In 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery: June 3–6, Rome (Italy), 1998; p. 777–784
16.
go back to reference Pérez-Vicente F, Arroyo A, Serrano P, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial of single vs double purse-string stapled mucosectomy in the treatment of prolapsed haemorrhoids. Int J Colorectal Dis 2005;21:38–43PubMedCrossRef Pérez-Vicente F, Arroyo A, Serrano P, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial of single vs double purse-string stapled mucosectomy in the treatment of prolapsed haemorrhoids. Int J Colorectal Dis 2005;21:38–43PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sutherland LM, Burchard AK, Matsuda K, et al. A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg 2002;137:1395–1406PubMedCrossRef Sutherland LM, Burchard AK, Matsuda K, et al. A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg 2002;137:1395–1406PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Qua HM, Hadi HI, Hay DJ, et al. Residual staples as a possible cause of rectal bleeding after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 2003;5:196CrossRef Qua HM, Hadi HI, Hay DJ, et al. Residual staples as a possible cause of rectal bleeding after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 2003;5:196CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mascagni D, Zeri KP, Di Matteo FM, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy: surgical notes and results. Hepatogastroenterology 2003;50:1878–1882PubMed Mascagni D, Zeri KP, Di Matteo FM, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy: surgical notes and results. Hepatogastroenterology 2003;50:1878–1882PubMed
20.
go back to reference Pérez-Vicente F, Arroyo A, Candela F, et al. Importancia de la curva de aprendizaje con PHH-33 para el tratamiento quirúrgico de las hemorroides. Cir Esp 2004;1:20–24 Pérez-Vicente F, Arroyo A, Candela F, et al. Importancia de la curva de aprendizaje con PHH-33 para el tratamiento quirúrgico de las hemorroides. Cir Esp 2004;1:20–24
Metadata
Title
Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Different Circular Staplers for Mucosectomy in the Treatment of Hemorrhoids
Authors
Antonio Arroyo, PhD
Francisco Pérez-Vicente, MD
Elena Miranda, MD
Ana Sánchez, MD
Pilar Serrano, PhD
Fernando Candela, PhD
Israel Oliver, PhD
Rafael Calpena, PhD
Publication date
01-07-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 7/2006
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0222-7

Other articles of this Issue 7/2006

World Journal of Surgery 7/2006 Go to the issue