Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2004

01-09-2004 | Original Scientific Reports

Predictive Factors of Stenosis after Stapled Colorectal Anastomosis: Prospective Analysis of 179 Consecutive Patients

Authors: Guillermo C. Bannura, M.D., Miguel Angel G. Cumsille, Alejandro E. Barrera, M.D., Jaime P. Contreras, M.D., Carlos L. Melo, M.D., Daniel C. Soto, M.D.

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 9/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

The incidence, risk factors, and clinical relevance of stenosis of stapled colorectal anastomosis (CRA) were studied prospectively. Anastomotic stricture was defined as the inability of traversing the anastomosis with the rigid proctoscope. The population studied consisted of 179 patients (94 males) with an average age of 59.3 years (range: 20 to 91 years). The main indication for surgery was colorectal cancer in 59% of the cases, followed by diverticular disease in 23%. The first endoscopic control was performed before 4 months in 25% of the patients, between 5 and 10 months in 50%, and during the following 10 months in 25%. Stenosis was verified with the rigid instrument in 21.1% of the cases and with the flexible colonoscope in 4.4%. The barium enema performed in 12 cases confirmed a punctiform stenosis in 5 patients, 4 of whom had been asymptomatic. An endoscopic dilatation was performed on 5 of the 8 symptomatic patients, with one relapse that required an additional dilatation. In the univariate analysis only the lesser 4-month interval was statistically significant (p = 0.033; odds ratio (OR) = 2.3; confidence interval (CI) 95% = 1.06 to 4.97). Male patients (p = 0.057; OR = 2.08; IC 95% = 0.97–4.44) show a tendency to CRA stricture that does not reach statistically significant levels. In the multivariate analysis, only sex (p = 0.04; OR = 4.11; IC 95% = 1.03 to 5.41) and the time interval (p = 0.012; OR = 2.87; IC 95% = 1.25 to 6.57) appear as independent variables in stenosis risk of a stapled CRA. The incidence of this complication depends on the criteria used for defining it. It is clinically relevant in no more than 5% of the patients. Five out of eight patients in category II were treated successfully with an endoscopic dilatation, while the other three improved spontaneously. Early stenosis, although frequent, is generally asymptomatic and disappears spontaneously. Considering the lack of correlation between the degree of stricture and its symptomatology, it is convenient to combine both the anatomic and the clinical criteria in the selection of candidates for an eventual therapeutic procedure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chandler, PJ, Orkin, BA 1998Operative treatment of rectal cancerBeck, DEWexner, SD eds. Fundamentals of Anorectal SurgeryW. B. SaundersLondon336339 Chandler, PJ, Orkin, BA 1998Operative treatment of rectal cancerBeck, DEWexner, SD eds. Fundamentals of Anorectal SurgeryW. B. SaundersLondon336339
2.
go back to reference Killinback, M 1995Anastomotic strictureWexner, SDAM, III eds. Clinical Decision Making in Colorectal SurgeryIgaku-Shoin Medical PublishersNew York483488 Killinback, M 1995Anastomotic strictureWexner, SDAM, III eds. Clinical Decision Making in Colorectal SurgeryIgaku-Shoin Medical PublishersNew York483488
3.
go back to reference Beart, RW, Kelly, KA 1981Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomosesAm. J. Surg.141143147CrossRefPubMed Beart, RW, Kelly, KA 1981Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomosesAm. J. Surg.141143147CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Brennan, SS, Pickford, IR, Evans, M, et al. 1982Staples or sutures for colonic anastomoses: a controlled clinical trialBr. J. Surg.69722724PubMed Brennan, SS, Pickford, IR, Evans, M,  et al. 1982Staples or sutures for colonic anastomoses: a controlled clinical trialBr. J. Surg.69722724PubMed
5.
go back to reference Blamey, SL, Lee, PW 1982A comparison of circular stapling devices in colorectal anastomosesBr. J. Surg.691922PubMed Blamey, SL, Lee, PW 1982A comparison of circular stapling devices in colorectal anastomosesBr. J. Surg.691922PubMed
6.
go back to reference Fasth, S, Hendlund, H, Svaninger, G, et al. 1982Autosuture of low colorectal anastomosisActa Chir. Scand.148535539PubMed Fasth, S, Hendlund, H, Svaninger, G,  et al. 1982Autosuture of low colorectal anastomosisActa Chir. Scand.148535539PubMed
7.
go back to reference Graffner, H, Fredlund, P, Olsson, S-A, et al. 1983Protective colostomy in low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling instrument: a randomized studyDis. Colon Rectum268790PubMed Graffner, H, Fredlund, P, Olsson, S-A,  et al. 1983Protective colostomy in low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling instrument: a randomized studyDis. Colon Rectum268790PubMed
8.
go back to reference Fingerhut, A, Elhadad, A, Hay, JM, et al. 1994Infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewn versus circular staples. A controlled clinical trial. French Associations for Surgical ResearchSurgery116484490PubMed Fingerhut, A, Elhadad, A, Hay, JM,  et al. 1994Infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewn versus circular staples. A controlled clinical trial. French Associations for Surgical ResearchSurgery116484490PubMed
9.
go back to reference Sarker, SK, Chaudhry, R, Sinha, VK 1994A comparison of stapled vs handsewn anastomosis in anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectumInd. J. Cancer31133137 Sarker, SK, Chaudhry, R, Sinha, VK 1994A comparison of stapled vs handsewn anastomosis in anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectumInd. J. Cancer31133137
10.
go back to reference Griffen, FD, Knight, CD, Whitaker, JM, et al. 1990The double stapling technique for low anterior resectionAnn. Surg.211745752PubMed Griffen, FD, Knight, CD, Whitaker, JM,  et al. 1990The double stapling technique for low anterior resectionAnn. Surg.211745752PubMed
11.
go back to reference Luchtefeld, MA, Milson, JW, Senagore, A, et al. 1989Colorectal anastomosis stenosis. Results of a survey of the ASCRS membershipDis. Colon Rectum32733736PubMed Luchtefeld, MA, Milson, JW, Senagore, A,  et al. 1989Colorectal anastomosis stenosis. Results of a survey of the ASCRS membershipDis. Colon Rectum32733736PubMed
12.
go back to reference Rae, HM, McLeod, RS 1998Handsewn vs. stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgeryDis. Colon Rectum41180189PubMed Rae, HM, McLeod, RS 1998Handsewn vs. stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgeryDis. Colon Rectum41180189PubMed
13.
go back to reference Ballantyne, GH 1984The experimental basis of intestinal suturing effects of surgical technique, inflammation and infection on enteric wound healingDis. Colon Rectum276171PubMed Ballantyne, GH 1984The experimental basis of intestinal suturing effects of surgical technique, inflammation and infection on enteric wound healingDis. Colon Rectum276171PubMed
14.
go back to reference Bannura, G, Melo, C, Contreras, J, et al. 2002Suturas mecánicas en cirugía colorrectal: análisis de 225 pacientes consecutivosRev. Chil. Cir.54351358 Bannura, G, Melo, C, Contreras, J,  et al. 2002Suturas mecánicas en cirugía colorrectal: análisis de 225 pacientes consecutivosRev. Chil. Cir.54351358
15.
go back to reference Waxman, BP 1983Large bowel anastomoses. II. The circular staplesBr. J. Surg.706467PubMed Waxman, BP 1983Large bowel anastomoses. II. The circular staplesBr. J. Surg.706467PubMed
16.
go back to reference Smith, LE 1981Anastomosis with EEA stapler after anterior colonic resectionDis. Colon Rectum24236242PubMed Smith, LE 1981Anastomosis with EEA stapler after anterior colonic resectionDis. Colon Rectum24236242PubMed
17.
go back to reference Waxman, BP, Yii, MK, Pahlman, L 1995Stapling in colorectal surgeryMazier, WP eds. Surgery of the Colon, Rectum and AnusWB SaundersPhiladelphia Waxman, BP, Yii, MK, Pahlman, L 1995Stapling in colorectal surgeryMazier, WP eds. Surgery of the Colon, Rectum and AnusWB SaundersPhiladelphia
18.
go back to reference Vignali, A, Fazio, VW, Lavery, IC, et al. 1997Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1014 patientsJ. Am. Coll. Surg.185105113CrossRefPubMed Vignali, A, Fazio, VW, Lavery, IC,  et al. 1997Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1014 patientsJ. Am. Coll. Surg.185105113CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hallböök, O, Pâhlman, L, Krog, M, et al. 1996Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resectionAnn. Surg.2245865CrossRefPubMed Hallböök, O, Pâhlman, L, Krog, M,  et al. 1996Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resectionAnn. Surg.2245865CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Shimada, S, Matsuda, M, Uno, K, et al. 1996A new device for the treatment of coloproctostomic stricture after double staplingAnn. Surg.224603608CrossRefPubMed Shimada, S, Matsuda, M, Uno, K,  et al. 1996A new device for the treatment of coloproctostomic stricture after double staplingAnn. Surg.224603608CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Schlegel, RD, Dehni, N, Parc, R, et al. 2001Results of reoperations in colorectal anastomotic stricturesDis. Colon Rectum4414641468PubMed Schlegel, RD, Dehni, N, Parc, R,  et al. 2001Results of reoperations in colorectal anastomotic stricturesDis. Colon Rectum4414641468PubMed
22.
go back to reference Marchena Gòmez, J, Ruizdelacuesta, E, Gòmezguerra, G, et al. 1997Anastomotic stricture with the EEA-stapler after colorectal anastomosisRev. Esp. Enf. Dig.89835842 Marchena Gòmez, J, Ruizdelacuesta, E, Gòmezguerra, G,  et al. 1997Anastomotic stricture with the EEA-stapler after colorectal anastomosisRev. Esp. Enf. Dig.89835842
23.
go back to reference Fegiz, G, Angelini, L, Bezzi, M 1983Rectal cancer: restorative surgery with the EEA stapling deviceInt. Surg.681318PubMed Fegiz, G, Angelini, L, Bezzi, M 1983Rectal cancer: restorative surgery with the EEA stapling deviceInt. Surg.681318PubMed
24.
go back to reference Griffen, FD, Knight, CD, Knight, CD,Jr 1992Results of the double stapling procedure in pelvic surgeryWorld J. Surg.16866871PubMed Griffen, FD, Knight, CD, Knight, CD,Jr 1992Results of the double stapling procedure in pelvic surgeryWorld J. Surg.16866871PubMed
25.
go back to reference Cerdán, FJ, Cantero, R, Martínez, S, et al. 1996Técnica de doble grapado en anastomosis colorrectalesCir. Esp.59224226 Cerdán, FJ, Cantero, R, Martínez, S,  et al. 1996Técnica de doble grapado en anastomosis colorrectalesCir. Esp.59224226
26.
go back to reference Poon, RT-P, Chu, K-W, Hoj, W-C, et al. 1999Prospective evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma for low anterior resection with total mesorectal excisionWorld J. Surg.23463468PubMed Poon, RT-P, Chu, K-W, Hoj, W-C,  et al. 1999Prospective evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma for low anterior resection with total mesorectal excisionWorld J. Surg.23463468PubMed
27.
go back to reference Oz, MC, Forde, KA 1990Endoscopic alternatives in the management of colonic stricturesSurgery108513519PubMed Oz, MC, Forde, KA 1990Endoscopic alternatives in the management of colonic stricturesSurgery108513519PubMed
28.
go back to reference Pagni, S, McLaughlin, CM 1995Simple technique for the treatment of strictured colorectal anastomosisDis. Colon Rectum38433434PubMed Pagni, S, McLaughlin, CM 1995Simple technique for the treatment of strictured colorectal anastomosisDis. Colon Rectum38433434PubMed
29.
go back to reference Galizia, G, Lieto, E, Pelosio, L, et al. 1999Comparison between the biofragmentable anastomosis ring and stapled anastomoses in the extraperitoneal rectum: a prospective, randomized studyInt. J. Colorectal Dis.14286290CrossRefPubMed Galizia, G, Lieto, E, Pelosio, L,  et al. 1999Comparison between the biofragmentable anastomosis ring and stapled anastomoses in the extraperitoneal rectum: a prospective, randomized studyInt. J. Colorectal Dis.14286290CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Predictive Factors of Stenosis after Stapled Colorectal Anastomosis: Prospective Analysis of 179 Consecutive Patients
Authors
Guillermo C. Bannura, M.D.
Miguel Angel G. Cumsille
Alejandro E. Barrera, M.D.
Jaime P. Contreras, M.D.
Carlos L. Melo, M.D.
Daniel C. Soto, M.D.
Publication date
01-09-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 9/2004
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-004-7375-7

Other articles of this Issue 9/2004

World Journal of Surgery 9/2004 Go to the issue