Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2022

28-06-2022 | Breast Reduction Plastic | Original Article

Nationally Validated Scoring System to Predict Unplanned Reoperation and Readmission after Breast Reduction

Authors: Theresa K. Webster, Pablo A. Baltodano, Xiaoning Lu, Huaqing Zhao, Nicholas Elmer, Karen E. Massada, Juliet Panichella, Rohan Brebion, Sthefano Araya, Sameer A. Patel

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Reduction mammoplasty continues to be a commonly sought procedure with complication rates ranging from 4.3 to 8.2%. In the current study, we sought to identify the clinical and preoperative risk factors for unplanned reoperation and readmission within the first postoperative month on a national scale.

Methods

Patients who underwent reduction mammoplasty from the ACS-NSQIP 2012–2019 database were analyzed to determine rates of reoperation and readmission within 30 days of the initial breast surgery. The cohort was divided into 60 and 40% random testing and validation samples. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was then performed to isolate independent factors of unplanned readmission and reoperation using the testing sample (n = 22,743). The predictors were weighted according to beta coefficients to develop an integer-based clinical risk score predictive of complications. This system was then validated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis of the validation sample (n = 15,162).

Results

A total of 37,905 reduction mammoplasties were analyzed. 1.3% of patients had an unplanned readmission. Independent risk factors for unplanned readmission included age older than the median of 44 years (p < 0.01), inpatient procedure (p < 0.01), smoking (p < 0.01), hypertension (p = 0.01), COPD (p < 0.05), BMI ≥ 35 (p < 0.01), and operation time greater than the median of 142 minutes ( p < 0.01). The factors were integrated into a scoring system, ranging from 0 to 36, and an ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.66. 1.9% of patients underwent unplanned reoperation. Independent risk factors for unplanned reoperation in this population included age older than the median of 44 years (p < 0.01), inpatient status (p < 0.01), and a history of bleeding disorders (p < 0.05). The factors were integrated into a scoring system, ranging from 0 to 25, and the ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.61.

Conclusions

We present a validated scoring system to better inform patients about their risk for unplanned reoperation and readmission following reduction mammoplasty. This system will enable surgeons to optimize patient selection and interventions in order to decrease morbidity and unnecessary health-care expenditure.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.​
Literature
2.
go back to reference Aravind P, Siotos C, Bernatowicz E et al (2020) Breast Reduction in Adults: Identifying Risk Factors for Overall 30-Day Postoperative Complications. Aesthetic Surgery Journal 40(12):676–685CrossRef Aravind P, Siotos C, Bernatowicz E et al (2020) Breast Reduction in Adults: Identifying Risk Factors for Overall 30-Day Postoperative Complications. Aesthetic Surgery Journal 40(12):676–685CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Waltho D, Gallo L, Gallo M et al (2020) Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Breast Reduction Mammoplasty: A Systematic Review. Aesthetic Surg J 40(4):383–391CrossRef Waltho D, Gallo L, Gallo M et al (2020) Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Breast Reduction Mammoplasty: A Systematic Review. Aesthetic Surg J 40(4):383–391CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cunningham BL, Gear AJ, Kerrigan CL et al (2005) Analysis of breast reduction complications derived from the BRAVO study. Plast Reconstr Surg 115(6):1597–1604CrossRef Cunningham BL, Gear AJ, Kerrigan CL et al (2005) Analysis of breast reduction complications derived from the BRAVO study. Plast Reconstr Surg 115(6):1597–1604CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shestak KC, Davidson EH (2016) Assessing risk and avoiding complications in breast reduction. Clin Plast Surg 43(2):323–331CrossRef Shestak KC, Davidson EH (2016) Assessing risk and avoiding complications in breast reduction. Clin Plast Surg 43(2):323–331CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hanwright PJ, Hirsch EM, Seth AK et al (2013) A Multi-Institutional Perspective of Complication Rates for Elective Non Reconstructive Breast Surgery: An Analysis of NSQIP data from 2006 to 2010. Aesthetic Surg J 33(3):378–386CrossRef Hanwright PJ, Hirsch EM, Seth AK et al (2013) A Multi-Institutional Perspective of Complication Rates for Elective Non Reconstructive Breast Surgery: An Analysis of NSQIP data from 2006 to 2010. Aesthetic Surg J 33(3):378–386CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gulcelik MA, Dogan L, Camlibel M et al (2011) Early complications of a reduction mammoplasty technique in the treatment of macromastia with or without breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 11(6):395–399CrossRef Gulcelik MA, Dogan L, Camlibel M et al (2011) Early complications of a reduction mammoplasty technique in the treatment of macromastia with or without breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 11(6):395–399CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Imahiyerobo TA, Pharmer LA, Swistel AJ et al (2015) A Comparative Retrospective Analysis of Complications after Oncoplastic Breast Reduction and Breast Reduction for Benign Macromastia: Are these procedures equally safe? Ann Plast Surg 75(4):370–375CrossRef Imahiyerobo TA, Pharmer LA, Swistel AJ et al (2015) A Comparative Retrospective Analysis of Complications after Oncoplastic Breast Reduction and Breast Reduction for Benign Macromastia: Are these procedures equally safe? Ann Plast Surg 75(4):370–375CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Winter R, Haug I, Lebo P et al (2017) Standardizing the Complication Rate after Breast Reduction using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Surgery 161(5):1430–1435CrossRef Winter R, Haug I, Lebo P et al (2017) Standardizing the Complication Rate after Breast Reduction using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Surgery 161(5):1430–1435CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Srinivasaiah N, Iwuchukwu OC, Stanley PR et al (2014) Risk factors for complications following breast reduction: results from a randomized control trial. Breast J 20(3):274–278CrossRef Srinivasaiah N, Iwuchukwu OC, Stanley PR et al (2014) Risk factors for complications following breast reduction: results from a randomized control trial. Breast J 20(3):274–278CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nelson JA, Fischer JP, Chung CU et al (2014) Obesity and early complications following reduction mammoplasty: an analysis of 4545 patients from the 2005–2011 NSQIP datasets. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 48(5):334–339CrossRef Nelson JA, Fischer JP, Chung CU et al (2014) Obesity and early complications following reduction mammoplasty: an analysis of 4545 patients from the 2005–2011 NSQIP datasets. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 48(5):334–339CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fischer JP, Cleveland EC, Shang, et al (2014) Complications following reduction mammoplasty: a review of 3538 cases from the 2005–2010 NSQIP data sets. Aesthetic Surgery Journal 34(1):66–73CrossRef Fischer JP, Cleveland EC, Shang, et al (2014) Complications following reduction mammoplasty: a review of 3538 cases from the 2005–2010 NSQIP data sets. Aesthetic Surgery Journal 34(1):66–73CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Henry SL, Crawford JL, Puckett CL (2009) Risk factors and complications in reduction mammoplasty: novel associations and preoperative assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(4):1040–1046CrossRef Henry SL, Crawford JL, Puckett CL (2009) Risk factors and complications in reduction mammoplasty: novel associations and preoperative assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(4):1040–1046CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Montemurro P, Hedén P, Behr B, Wallner C (2020) Controllable factors to reduce the rate of complications in primary breast augmentation: a review of the literature. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 45(2):498–505CrossRef Montemurro P, Hedén P, Behr B, Wallner C (2020) Controllable factors to reduce the rate of complications in primary breast augmentation: a review of the literature. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 45(2):498–505CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Daane SP, Rockwell WB (1999) Breast reduction techniques and outcomes: A meta-analysis. Aesthetic Surg J 19(4):293–303CrossRef Daane SP, Rockwell WB (1999) Breast reduction techniques and outcomes: A meta-analysis. Aesthetic Surg J 19(4):293–303CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fischer JP, Cleveland EC, Shang EK et al (2014) Complications following reduction mammoplasty: a review of 3538 cases from the 2005–2010 NSQIP data sets. Aesthetic Surg J 34(1):66–73CrossRef Fischer JP, Cleveland EC, Shang EK et al (2014) Complications following reduction mammoplasty: a review of 3538 cases from the 2005–2010 NSQIP data sets. Aesthetic Surg J 34(1):66–73CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Manahan MA, Buretta KJ, Chang D et al (2015) An outcomes analysis of 2142 breast reduction procedures. Ann Plast Surg 74(3):289–292CrossRef Manahan MA, Buretta KJ, Chang D et al (2015) An outcomes analysis of 2142 breast reduction procedures. Ann Plast Surg 74(3):289–292CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tapking C, Boson AL, Rontoyanni VG et al (2020) Unplanned 30-day readmission rates after plastic and reconstructive surgery procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European J Plast Surg 43(6):701–712CrossRef Tapking C, Boson AL, Rontoyanni VG et al (2020) Unplanned 30-day readmission rates after plastic and reconstructive surgery procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European J Plast Surg 43(6):701–712CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mioton LM, Buck DW, Rambachan A et al (2014) Predictors of readmission after outpatient plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(1):173–180CrossRef Mioton LM, Buck DW, Rambachan A et al (2014) Predictors of readmission after outpatient plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(1):173–180CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Jain U, Salgado C, Mioton L et al (2014) Predictors of readmission after inpatient plastic surgery. Arch Plast Surg 41(2):116–121CrossRef Jain U, Salgado C, Mioton L et al (2014) Predictors of readmission after inpatient plastic surgery. Arch Plast Surg 41(2):116–121CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Shermak MA, Chang D, Buretta, et al (2011) Increasing age impairs outcomes in breast reduction surgery. Plast reconst surg 128(6):1182–1187CrossRef Shermak MA, Chang D, Buretta, et al (2011) Increasing age impairs outcomes in breast reduction surgery. Plast reconst surg 128(6):1182–1187CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hillam JS, Borsting EA, Chim JH et al (2017) Smoking as a risk factor for breast reduction: An analysis of 13,503 cases. J Plast Reconst Aesthet Surg 70(6):734–740CrossRef Hillam JS, Borsting EA, Chim JH et al (2017) Smoking as a risk factor for breast reduction: An analysis of 13,503 cases. J Plast Reconst Aesthet Surg 70(6):734–740CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Calotta N, Merola D, Slezak S et al (2020) Outpatient reduction mammoplasty offers significantly lower costs with comparable outcomes: A propensity score-matched analysis of 18,780 Cases. Plast Reconst Surg 145(3):499e–506eCrossRef Calotta N, Merola D, Slezak S et al (2020) Outpatient reduction mammoplasty offers significantly lower costs with comparable outcomes: A propensity score-matched analysis of 18,780 Cases. Plast Reconst Surg 145(3):499e–506eCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Baltodano PA, Reinhardt ME, Ata A, Simjee UF, Roth MZ, Patel A (2017) The Baltodano breast reduction score: A nationwide, multi-institutional, validated approach to reducing surgical-site morbidity. Plast Reconst Surg 140(2):258e–264eCrossRef Baltodano PA, Reinhardt ME, Ata A, Simjee UF, Roth MZ, Patel A (2017) The Baltodano breast reduction score: A nationwide, multi-institutional, validated approach to reducing surgical-site morbidity. Plast Reconst Surg 140(2):258e–264eCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Simpson AM, Donato DP, Kwok AC et al (2019) Predictors of complications following breast reduction surgery: a national surgical quality improvement program study of 16,812 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 72(1):43–51CrossRef Simpson AM, Donato DP, Kwok AC et al (2019) Predictors of complications following breast reduction surgery: a national surgical quality improvement program study of 16,812 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 72(1):43–51CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Young ZT, Close M, Herrera FA (2019) National surgical quality improvement program analysis of 9110 reduction mammoplasty patients: identifying risk factors associated with complications in patients older than 60 years. Ann Plast Surg 82(6S):S446–S449CrossRef Young ZT, Close M, Herrera FA (2019) National surgical quality improvement program analysis of 9110 reduction mammoplasty patients: identifying risk factors associated with complications in patients older than 60 years. Ann Plast Surg 82(6S):S446–S449CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Nationally Validated Scoring System to Predict Unplanned Reoperation and Readmission after Breast Reduction
Authors
Theresa K. Webster
Pablo A. Baltodano
Xiaoning Lu
Huaqing Zhao
Nicholas Elmer
Karen E. Massada
Juliet Panichella
Rohan Brebion
Sthefano Araya
Sameer A. Patel
Publication date
28-06-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02966-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2022

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2022 Go to the issue