Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2023

24-03-2022 | Ear Correction | Original Article

Comparison of Transcutaneous Fixation-Assisted Method with Classical Needle-Assisted Method in Prominent Ear Surgery

Authors: Ilker Uyar, Ersin Aksam, Can Kopal, Emin Kapı

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Prominent ear deformity is an autosomal dominant inherited deformity. Surgery is the most effective treatment method for prominent ear patients. Different prominent ear operations have been described in the literature.
In this study, it is aimed to compare the transcutaneous fixation-assisted method that we described in prominent ear repair with the classical needle-assisted method.

Methods

Patients who were operated for bilateral prominent ear deformity between January 2017 and January 2020 were included in the study. Two different approaches were used in the operations. In the first group, conventional needles were used to adjust the position of the concha-scaphal sutures. In the second group, transcutaneous suturing was used to adjust the position of the concha-scaphal sutures. The duration of the operation was recorded. Patients were called for controls in 1–3–6 and 12th months; photographs were taken. Measurements were made in the preoperative period, in the intraoperative and at the postoperative 12th month. SPSS program was used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 52 patients were included in the study. There were 27 patients in Group 1and 25 patients in Group 2. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic characteristics (p>0.05).
While the average operation time was 80.37 minutes in Group 1, the average operation time was 60.40 minutes in Group 2. The operative times between the groups were statistically significant (p<0.05).
There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative measurements (p>0.05).

Conclusions

As a result, transcutaneous fixation-assisted method is performed faster than the classical needle-assisted method and the results are understood right at the beginning of the operation.

Level of evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Campobasso P, Belloli G (1993) Protruding Ears: The indications for surgical treatment (in Italian). Pediatr Med Chir 15:151PubMed Campobasso P, Belloli G (1993) Protruding Ears: The indications for surgical treatment (in Italian). Pediatr Med Chir 15:151PubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Tan ST, Abramson DL, MacDonald DM, Mulliken JB (1997) Molding therapy for infants with deformational auricular anomalies. Ann Plast Surg 38:263–268CrossRefPubMed Tan ST, Abramson DL, MacDonald DM, Mulliken JB (1997) Molding therapy for infants with deformational auricular anomalies. Ann Plast Surg 38:263–268CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Tan ST, Shibu M, Gault DT (1994) A splint for correction of congenital ear deformities. Br J Plast Surg 47:575CrossRefPubMed Tan ST, Shibu M, Gault DT (1994) A splint for correction of congenital ear deformities. Br J Plast Surg 47:575CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Matsuo K, Hirose T, Tomono T et al (1984) Nonsurgical correction of congenital auricular deformities in the early neonate: A preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:38CrossRefPubMed Matsuo K, Hirose T, Tomono T et al (1984) Nonsurgical correction of congenital auricular deformities in the early neonate: A preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:38CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mandal A, Bahia H, Ahmad T, Stewart KJ (2006) Comparison of cartilage scoring and cartilage sparing otoplasty–A study of 203 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:1170–1176CrossRefPubMed Mandal A, Bahia H, Ahmad T, Stewart KJ (2006) Comparison of cartilage scoring and cartilage sparing otoplasty–A study of 203 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:1170–1176CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Horlock N, Misra A, Gault DT (2001) The postauricular fascial flap as an adjunct to Mustardé and Furnas type otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1487–1490CrossRefPubMed Horlock N, Misra A, Gault DT (2001) The postauricular fascial flap as an adjunct to Mustardé and Furnas type otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1487–1490CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sinha M, Richard B (2012) Postauricular fascial flap and suture otoplasty: a prospective outcome study of 227 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65:367–371CrossRefPubMed Sinha M, Richard B (2012) Postauricular fascial flap and suture otoplasty: a prospective outcome study of 227 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65:367–371CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Szychta P, Stewart KJ (2013) Comparison of cartilage scoring and cartilage sparing techniques in unilateral otoplasty: a ten-year experience. Ann Plast Surg 71:522–527CrossRefPubMed Szychta P, Stewart KJ (2013) Comparison of cartilage scoring and cartilage sparing techniques in unilateral otoplasty: a ten-year experience. Ann Plast Surg 71:522–527CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wood-Smith D (1980) Otoplasty. In: Rees T (ed) Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 833 Wood-Smith D (1980) Otoplasty. In: Rees T (ed) Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 833
12.
go back to reference Petersson RS, Recker CA, Martin JR, Driscoll CL, Friedman O (2012) Identification of congenital auricular deformities during newborn hearing screening allows for non-surgical correction: A Mayo Clinic pilot study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76(10):1406–1412CrossRefPubMed Petersson RS, Recker CA, Martin JR, Driscoll CL, Friedman O (2012) Identification of congenital auricular deformities during newborn hearing screening allows for non-surgical correction: A Mayo Clinic pilot study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76(10):1406–1412CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference McDowell AJ (1968) Goals in otoplasty for protruding ears. Plast ReconstrSurg 41(1):17–27CrossRef McDowell AJ (1968) Goals in otoplasty for protruding ears. Plast ReconstrSurg 41(1):17–27CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yuce E, Gunenc AC, Yucel AF, Yazar M, Karşıdağ S (2017) Surgical treatment of prominent Ear: 5-year clinical experience in 108 patients. Turk J Plast Surg 25(1):12–19CrossRef Yuce E, Gunenc AC, Yucel AF, Yazar M, Karşıdağ S (2017) Surgical treatment of prominent Ear: 5-year clinical experience in 108 patients. Turk J Plast Surg 25(1):12–19CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ozturan O, Dogan R, Eren SB, Aksoy F, Veyseller B (2013) Percutaneous adjustable closed otoplasty for prominent ear deformity. J Craniofac Surg 24(2):398–404CrossRefPubMed Ozturan O, Dogan R, Eren SB, Aksoy F, Veyseller B (2013) Percutaneous adjustable closed otoplasty for prominent ear deformity. J Craniofac Surg 24(2):398–404CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ozturan O, Dogan R, Eren SB, Aksoy F, Veyseller B (2014) Cartilage sparing techniques versus percutaneous adjustable closed otoplasty for prominent ear deformity. J Craniofac Surg 25(3):752–757CrossRefPubMed Ozturan O, Dogan R, Eren SB, Aksoy F, Veyseller B (2014) Cartilage sparing techniques versus percutaneous adjustable closed otoplasty for prominent ear deformity. J Craniofac Surg 25(3):752–757CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Spira M, McCrea R, Gerow FJ, Hardy SB (1969) Correction of the principal deformities causing protruding ears. Plast Reconstr Surg 44(2):150–154CrossRefPubMed Spira M, McCrea R, Gerow FJ, Hardy SB (1969) Correction of the principal deformities causing protruding ears. Plast Reconstr Surg 44(2):150–154CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mustarde JC (1963) The correction of prominent ears using simple mattress sutures. Br J Plast Surg 16:170–178CrossRefPubMed Mustarde JC (1963) The correction of prominent ears using simple mattress sutures. Br J Plast Surg 16:170–178CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Elliott RAJ (1978) Complications in the treatment of prominent ears. Clin Plast Surg 5(3):479–490CrossRefPubMed Elliott RAJ (1978) Complications in the treatment of prominent ears. Clin Plast Surg 5(3):479–490CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Furnas DW (1968) Correction of prominent ears by conchamastoid sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg 42(3):189–193CrossRefPubMed Furnas DW (1968) Correction of prominent ears by conchamastoid sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg 42(3):189–193CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Toplu Y, Toplu SA, Sapmaz E, Deliktas H (2014) An unusual cause of conductive hearing loss: bilateral complete meatal obstruction following otoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 25(2):e168–e170CrossRefPubMed Toplu Y, Toplu SA, Sapmaz E, Deliktas H (2014) An unusual cause of conductive hearing loss: bilateral complete meatal obstruction following otoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 25(2):e168–e170CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Beasley NJ, Jones NS (1996) Otoplasty: the problem of the deep conchal bowl. J Laryngol Otol 110(9):864–868CrossRefPubMed Beasley NJ, Jones NS (1996) Otoplasty: the problem of the deep conchal bowl. J Laryngol Otol 110(9):864–868CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Bauer BS, Song DH, Aitken ME (2002) Combined otoplasty technique: chondrocutaneous resection as the cornerstone to correctionof the prominent ear. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(4):1033–1040PubMed Bauer BS, Song DH, Aitken ME (2002) Combined otoplasty technique: chondrocutaneous resection as the cornerstone to correctionof the prominent ear. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(4):1033–1040PubMed
24.
go back to reference Yazar M, Basat SO, Bicer A, Yazar SK, Guven E, Kuvat SV, Emekli U (2012) Creating a neoconchal complex using the adjustable conchal sliding technique in prominent ear correction. J Craniofac Surg 23(5):1414–1417CrossRefPubMed Yazar M, Basat SO, Bicer A, Yazar SK, Guven E, Kuvat SV, Emekli U (2012) Creating a neoconchal complex using the adjustable conchal sliding technique in prominent ear correction. J Craniofac Surg 23(5):1414–1417CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Weerda H, Siegert R (1994) Complications in otoplastic surgery and their treatment. Facial Plast Surg 10(3):287–297CrossRefPubMed Weerda H, Siegert R (1994) Complications in otoplastic surgery and their treatment. Facial Plast Surg 10(3):287–297CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Limandjaja GC, Breugem CC, Mink van der Molen AB, Kon M (2009) Complications of otoplasty: a literature review. J Plast ReconstrAesthet Surg 62(1):19–27 Limandjaja GC, Breugem CC, Mink van der Molen AB, Kon M (2009) Complications of otoplasty: a literature review. J Plast ReconstrAesthet Surg 62(1):19–27
Metadata
Title
Comparison of Transcutaneous Fixation-Assisted Method with Classical Needle-Assisted Method in Prominent Ear Surgery
Authors
Ilker Uyar
Ersin Aksam
Can Kopal
Emin Kapı
Publication date
24-03-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02838-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2023 Go to the issue