Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2021

01-10-2021 | Breast Surgery | Innovative Techniques

Percutaneous Intradermal Purse-String closure for Correction of Male Tuberous Nipple-Areola Complex Deformity

Authors: Jenny Carvajal, Melissa Carvajal

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Male tuberous breast is an exceedingly rare condition that not fit properly into the majority of existing classifications of gynecomastia. This deformity has been categorized by Cordova and Moschella as gynecomastia grade III; however, they do not make any reference to the isolated tuberous deformity of the nipple-areola complex (NAC).
Considering that the areolar area is the main ‘‘esthetic unit’’ in the male chest, surgical correction of the isolated tuberous NAC deformity can be challenging.
There is a belief that this deformity is unsuccessfully corrected when approached through a limited periareolar incision at the lower pole. A complete periareolar incision, with a concentric excision of excess areolar skin, is usually required leaving an unnatural-looking round periareolar scar on the male thorax.

Methods

We describe a variation of a surgical technique for the correction of a male tuberous NAC deformity in a teenager who rejected a conspicuous round periareolar scar after surgery. This modification combines a conventional lower hemiareolar approach with a percutaneous intradermal purse-string suture in the superior areolar margin to reduce the areolar diameter, avoiding an evident circumareolar scar.

Result

At the six-month follow-up, areolar widening or tuberous deformity relapse was not observed. The patient felt satisfied with the outcome.

Conclusion

The use of percutaneous intradermal purse-string periareolar suture for correction of this rare deformity is a simple and reproducible surgical technique that could help to obtain a better cosmetic result by restoring the contour of the male chest while minimizing the visibility of the residual scar.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fruhstorfer BH, Malata CM (2003) A systematic approach to the surgical treatment of gynaecomastia. Br J Plast Surg 56(3):237–246CrossRef Fruhstorfer BH, Malata CM (2003) A systematic approach to the surgical treatment of gynaecomastia. Br J Plast Surg 56(3):237–246CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rohrich RJ, Ha RY, Kenkel JM, Adams WP Jr (2003) Classification and management of gynecomastia: defining the role of ultrasound-assisted liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(2):909-23, Discussion 24–25 Rohrich RJ, Ha RY, Kenkel JM, Adams WP Jr (2003) Classification and management of gynecomastia: defining the role of ultrasound-assisted liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(2):909-23, Discussion 24–25
3.
go back to reference Knorr D, Bidlingmaier F (1975) Gynaecomastia in male adolescents. Clin Endocrinol Metab 4(1):157–171CrossRef Knorr D, Bidlingmaier F (1975) Gynaecomastia in male adolescents. Clin Endocrinol Metab 4(1):157–171CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Grolleau JL, Lanfrey E, Lavigne B, Chavoin JP, Costagliola M (1999) Breast base anomalies: treatment strategy for tuberous breasts, minor deformities, and asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(7):2040–2048CrossRef Grolleau JL, Lanfrey E, Lavigne B, Chavoin JP, Costagliola M (1999) Breast base anomalies: treatment strategy for tuberous breasts, minor deformities, and asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(7):2040–2048CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Waltho D, Hatchell A, Thoma A (2017) Gynecomastia classification for surgical management: a systematic review and novel classification system. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(3):638e-e648CrossRef Waltho D, Hatchell A, Thoma A (2017) Gynecomastia classification for surgical management: a systematic review and novel classification system. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(3):638e-e648CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Monteiro D, Horta R, Amarante J, Silva A, Silva P (2015) Tuberous male breast: assessment and esthetic correction. Breast J 21(6):696–698CrossRef Monteiro D, Horta R, Amarante J, Silva A, Silva P (2015) Tuberous male breast: assessment and esthetic correction. Breast J 21(6):696–698CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Webster JP (1946) Mastectomy for Gynecomastia Through a Semicircular Intra-areolar Incision. Ann Surg 124(3):557–575CrossRef Webster JP (1946) Mastectomy for Gynecomastia Through a Semicircular Intra-areolar Incision. Ann Surg 124(3):557–575CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nydick M, Bustos J, Dale JH Jr, Rawson RW (1961) Gynecomastia in adolescent boys. Jama 178:449–454CrossRef Nydick M, Bustos J, Dale JH Jr, Rawson RW (1961) Gynecomastia in adolescent boys. Jama 178:449–454CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S (1973) Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 51(1):48–52CrossRef Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S (1973) Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 51(1):48–52CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Deutinger M, Freilinger G (1986) Gynecomastia: attempt at a classification and surgical results. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 18(4):239–241PubMed Deutinger M, Freilinger G (1986) Gynecomastia: attempt at a classification and surgical results. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 18(4):239–241PubMed
11.
go back to reference Mladick RA (2004) Body contouring: gynecomastia. Aesthet Surg J 24(5):471–479CrossRef Mladick RA (2004) Body contouring: gynecomastia. Aesthet Surg J 24(5):471–479CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gusenoff JA, Coon D, Rubin JP (2008) Pseudogynecomastia after massive weight loss: detectability of technique, patient satisfaction, and classification. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(5):1301–1311CrossRef Gusenoff JA, Coon D, Rubin JP (2008) Pseudogynecomastia after massive weight loss: detectability of technique, patient satisfaction, and classification. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(5):1301–1311CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ratnam BV (2009) A new classification and treatment protocol for gynecomastia. Aesthet Surg J 29(1):26–31CrossRef Ratnam BV (2009) A new classification and treatment protocol for gynecomastia. Aesthet Surg J 29(1):26–31CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Barros AC, Sampaio MC (2012) Gynecomastia: physiopathology, evaluation and treatment. Sao Paulo Med J 130(3):187–197CrossRef Barros AC, Sampaio MC (2012) Gynecomastia: physiopathology, evaluation and treatment. Sao Paulo Med J 130(3):187–197CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Çil Y BğtM, Aktaş G, Yapıcı AK, Öztürk S (2012) Adipose tissue measurement in gynecomastia with computerized tomography. Erciyes Med J 34:15–19 Çil Y BğtM, Aktaş G, Yapıcı AK, Öztürk S (2012) Adipose tissue measurement in gynecomastia with computerized tomography. Erciyes Med J 34:15–19
16.
go back to reference Monarca C, Rizzo MI (2013) Gynecomastia: tips and tricks-classification and surgical approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(5):863e–865eCrossRef Monarca C, Rizzo MI (2013) Gynecomastia: tips and tricks-classification and surgical approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(5):863e–865eCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cordova A, Moschella F (2008) Algorithm for clinical evaluation and surgical treatment of gynaecomastia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61(1):41–49CrossRef Cordova A, Moschella F (2008) Algorithm for clinical evaluation and surgical treatment of gynaecomastia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61(1):41–49CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kaoutzanis C, Schneeberger SJ, Wormer B, Song H, Ye F, Al Kassis S et al (2019) Current perceptions of the aesthetically ideal position and size of the male nipple-areolar complex. Aesthet Surg J 40:NP228–NP237 Kaoutzanis C, Schneeberger SJ, Wormer B, Song H, Ye F, Al Kassis S et al (2019) Current perceptions of the aesthetically ideal position and size of the male nipple-areolar complex. Aesthet Surg J 40:NP228–NP237
19.
go back to reference Godwin Y (2018) Correction of tuberous nipple areolar complex deformity in gynecomastia: the deformity that can get forgotten. Ann Plast Surg 81(1):3–6CrossRef Godwin Y (2018) Correction of tuberous nipple areolar complex deformity in gynecomastia: the deformity that can get forgotten. Ann Plast Surg 81(1):3–6CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Klinger M, Caviggioli F, Villani F, Forcellini D, Klinger F (2009) Gynecomastia and tuberous breast: assessment and surgical approach. Aesthet Plast Surg 33(5):786–787CrossRef Klinger M, Caviggioli F, Villani F, Forcellini D, Klinger F (2009) Gynecomastia and tuberous breast: assessment and surgical approach. Aesthet Plast Surg 33(5):786–787CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Gryskiewicz JM, Hatfield AS (2002) "Zigzag" wavy-line periareolar incision. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(7): 1778–1783, Discussion 84 Gryskiewicz JM, Hatfield AS (2002) "Zigzag" wavy-line periareolar incision. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(7): 1778–1783, Discussion 84
22.
go back to reference Innocenti A (2019) Male tuberous breast: a rare variant of gynecomastia. Clinical considerations and personal experience: tips and tricks to maximize surgical outcomes. Aesthet Plast Surg 43:1500–1505CrossRef Innocenti A (2019) Male tuberous breast: a rare variant of gynecomastia. Clinical considerations and personal experience: tips and tricks to maximize surgical outcomes. Aesthet Plast Surg 43:1500–1505CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Benelli L (1990) A new periareolar mammaplasty: the “round block” technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 14(2):93–100CrossRef Benelli L (1990) A new periareolar mammaplasty: the “round block” technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 14(2):93–100CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Atiyeh BS, Dibo SA, Hayek SN (2008) Contouring of the male anterior chest following bariatric surgery and massive weight loss. Aesthet Surg J 28(6):688–696CrossRef Atiyeh BS, Dibo SA, Hayek SN (2008) Contouring of the male anterior chest following bariatric surgery and massive weight loss. Aesthet Surg J 28(6):688–696CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gorvetzia JFC, Copeland-Halperin L, Nigriny J (2019) Correction of the tuberous breast deformity in a prepubescent male patient: a surgical approach to an unusual problem. JPRAS Open 19:98–105CrossRef Gorvetzia JFC, Copeland-Halperin L, Nigriny J (2019) Correction of the tuberous breast deformity in a prepubescent male patient: a surgical approach to an unusual problem. JPRAS Open 19:98–105CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Persichetti P, Berloco M, Casadei RM, Marangi GF, Di Lella F, Nobili AM (2001) Gynecomastia and the complete circumareolar approach in the surgical management of skin redundancy. Plast Reconstr Surg 107(4):948–954CrossRef Persichetti P, Berloco M, Casadei RM, Marangi GF, Di Lella F, Nobili AM (2001) Gynecomastia and the complete circumareolar approach in the surgical management of skin redundancy. Plast Reconstr Surg 107(4):948–954CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Beckenstein MS, Windle BH, Stroup RT Jr (1996) Anatomical parameters for nipple position and areolar diameter in males. Ann Plast Surg 36(1):33–36CrossRef Beckenstein MS, Windle BH, Stroup RT Jr (1996) Anatomical parameters for nipple position and areolar diameter in males. Ann Plast Surg 36(1):33–36CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Percutaneous Intradermal Purse-String closure for Correction of Male Tuberous Nipple-Areola Complex Deformity
Authors
Jenny Carvajal
Melissa Carvajal
Publication date
01-10-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02425-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2021 Go to the issue