Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 6/2021

01-12-2021 | Silicone | Original Article

Objective Comparison of FDA-Approved Breast Implant Products in the USA: 5-Year Update

Authors: Brianne Sullivan, Isabel Ryan, Peter W. Henderson

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There are currently four companies offering FDA-approved breast implants: Allergan, Sientra, Mentor, and Ideal Implant. In 2015, our paper “Objective Comparison of Commercially Available Breast Implant Devices” sought to provide a unique conceptual framework to better understand the similarities and differences between FDA-approved breast implant products and tissue expanders. This paper uses the same variables, such as fill material, shape, relative dimensions, and surface coating, to aid understanding of both the surgical trainee and the operating surgeon of what devices each company offers, with a focus on how the market has evolved over the ensuing 5 years.

Methods

The product catalogs of each FDA-approved company were carefully explored to determine the current available breast implants and tissue expanders. Subsequently, flow charts were created to provide a clear and objective survey of each companies’ offerings, highlighting where there are overlap and deficiencies, and where there has been contraction or growth.

Results

Disruptions to the industry, including both technological innovation and the recognition of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL), have caused a significant shift in the details of the available permanent breast implants, breast tissue expanders, sizers, and warranty programs.

Conclusion

As it has been in 2015, company jargon and brand names continue to make it challenging to discern the similarities and differences between company devices and programs. This project remained independent of any company’s funding, support, or input, making it a uniquely objective and informative survey of the current breast implant market that should assist surgeons in decision-making regarding the breast implant procedures.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ideal Implant (2018) Structured breast implant size chart. Idealimplant.com Ideal Implant (2018) Structured breast implant size chart. Idealimplant.com
8.
go back to reference Sientra, Inc. (2019) OPUS Luxe round breast implant product catalog Sientra, Inc. (2019) OPUS Luxe round breast implant product catalog
9.
go back to reference Mentor Worldwide LLC (2018) Mentor product catalog: tissue expanders, implants and sizers 2019. Mentorwwwllc.com Mentor Worldwide LLC (2018) Mentor product catalog: tissue expanders, implants and sizers 2019. Mentorwwwllc.com
11.
go back to reference Allergan (2020) Natrelle product catalog–the most comprehensive smooth profile Allergan (2020) Natrelle product catalog–the most comprehensive smooth profile
12.
go back to reference Sientra, Inc. (2015) HSC & HSC+ breast implants product catalog. MDC-0177 R1 Sientra, Inc. (2015) HSC & HSC+ breast implants product catalog. MDC-0177 R1
13.
go back to reference Sientra, Inc. (2019) AlloX2 & Dermaspan breast tissue expanders–quick reference. MDC-0037 R6 Sientra, Inc. (2019) AlloX2 & Dermaspan breast tissue expanders–quick reference. MDC-0037 R6
Metadata
Title
Objective Comparison of FDA-Approved Breast Implant Products in the USA: 5-Year Update
Authors
Brianne Sullivan
Isabel Ryan
Peter W. Henderson
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Silicone
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02395-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 6/2021 Go to the issue