Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2021

01-10-2021 | Breast Augmentation | Original Article

Breast Aesthetic Preferences: Analysis of 1294 Surveys

Authors: Natalia Mejia Jimenez, Alfredo Salvador Patrón Gómez

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Aesthetic breast perceptions could be variable among cultures. Fullness, superior/inferior pole proportion and orientation and size of the nipple areolar complex are key elements in patient post-operative satisfaction and should be considered when planning breast aesthetic surgery.

Methods

A descriptive study was designed, using an online survey, sent via social media. Standardized software modified images of breasts with different pole proportions, areolar nipple complex orientation and size were used.

Results

From 1294 surveys collected, 1291 were analysed (969 women and 322 men). Significant differences in preferences of upper/lower pole breast proportions were found among groups of different age, gender, level of education and previous history of breast surgery.

Conclusions

In the studied population, we found several variations in aesthetic breast preferences related to their demographic characteristics and for this reason we believe that this research may serve as a “macro” guide for both patient and surgeon in primary and secondary breast surgery. To our knowledge, this is the largest survey study concerning breast aesthetic preferences done in Colombia and second largest in the world.

Level of evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pusic AL, Chen CS, Klassen A, McCarthy C, Collins ED et al (2007) Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(4):823–839CrossRef Pusic AL, Chen CS, Klassen A, McCarthy C, Collins ED et al (2007) Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(4):823–839CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Codner MA, Mejia JD, Locke MB, Mahoney A, THiels C, Nahai FR et al (2011) A 15-year experience with primary breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(3):1300–1310CrossRef Codner MA, Mejia JD, Locke MB, Mahoney A, THiels C, Nahai FR et al (2011) A 15-year experience with primary breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(3):1300–1310CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Broer PN, Juran S, Walker ME, Mg R, Weichman K, Tanna N et al (2015) Aesthetic breast shape preferences among plastic surgeons. Ann Plast Surg 74(6):639–644CrossRef Broer PN, Juran S, Walker ME, Mg R, Weichman K, Tanna N et al (2015) Aesthetic breast shape preferences among plastic surgeons. Ann Plast Surg 74(6):639–644CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hsia HC, Thomson JG (2003) Differences in breast shape preferences between plastic surgeons and patients seeking breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(1):312–320CrossRef Hsia HC, Thomson JG (2003) Differences in breast shape preferences between plastic surgeons and patients seeking breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(1):312–320CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dixson BJ, Vassey PL, Sagata K, Sibanda N, Linklater WL, Dixson AF (2011) Men´s preferences for women´s breast morphology in New Zealand, Samoa and Papua New Guinea. Arch Sex Behav 40(6):1271–9CrossRef Dixson BJ, Vassey PL, Sagata K, Sibanda N, Linklater WL, Dixson AF (2011) Men´s preferences for women´s breast morphology in New Zealand, Samoa and Papua New Guinea. Arch Sex Behav 40(6):1271–9CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Avsar DK, Aygit AC, Benlier E, Top H, Taskinalp O (2010) Anthropometric breast measurement: a study of 385 Turkish female students. Aesthet Surg J 30(1):44–50CrossRef Avsar DK, Aygit AC, Benlier E, Top H, Taskinalp O (2010) Anthropometric breast measurement: a study of 385 Turkish female students. Aesthet Surg J 30(1):44–50CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kim MS, Sbalchiero JC, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Beahm EK, Markey MK (2008) Assessment of breast aesthetics. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(4):186e–194eCrossRef Kim MS, Sbalchiero JC, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Beahm EK, Markey MK (2008) Assessment of breast aesthetics. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(4):186e–194eCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Westreich M (1997) Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breast and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100(2):468–479CrossRef Westreich M (1997) Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breast and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100(2):468–479CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mallucci P, Branford OA (2014) Population analysis of the perfect breast: a morphometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(3):436–47CrossRef Mallucci P, Branford OA (2014) Population analysis of the perfect breast: a morphometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(3):436–47CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Carvajal C, Bermudez L, Riveros M (2016) Análisis morfométrico del seno ideal en la mujer posterior a implantes mamarios. Rev Colomb Cir Plástica Reconstr 22(2):17–40 Carvajal C, Bermudez L, Riveros M (2016) Análisis morfométrico del seno ideal en la mujer posterior a implantes mamarios. Rev Colomb Cir Plástica Reconstr 22(2):17–40
11.
go back to reference Mallucci P, Branford OA (2012) Concepts in aesthetic breast dimensions: analysis of the ideal breast. J PLast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS 65(1):8–16CrossRef Mallucci P, Branford OA (2012) Concepts in aesthetic breast dimensions: analysis of the ideal breast. J PLast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS 65(1):8–16CrossRef
12.
13.
go back to reference Mallucci P, Branford OA (2015) Shapes, proportions, and variations in breast aesthetic ideals: the definition of breast beauty, analysis and surgical practice. Clin Plast Surg 42(4):451–464CrossRef Mallucci P, Branford OA (2015) Shapes, proportions, and variations in breast aesthetic ideals: the definition of breast beauty, analysis and surgical practice. Clin Plast Surg 42(4):451–464CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Breast Aesthetic Preferences: Analysis of 1294 Surveys
Authors
Natalia Mejia Jimenez
Alfredo Salvador Patrón Gómez
Publication date
01-10-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02253-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2021 Go to the issue