Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 6/2021

01-12-2021 | Rhinoplasty | Commentary & Discussion

How to Avoid Making Your Systematic Review a Conventional Review Article

Authors: Osama A. Samargandi, Connor McGuire

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Excerpt

Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266. …
Literature
1.
Bhandari M, Morrow F, Kulkarni AV, Tornetta P 3rd (2001) Meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery. A systematic review of their methodologies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83(1):15–24CrossRef
2.
Samargandi OA, Hasan H, Thoma A (2016) Methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the plastic and reconstructive surgery literature: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(1):225e–236eCrossRef
3.
McGuire C, Samargandi OA, Corkum J, Retrouvey H, Bezuhly M (2019) Meta-analyses in plastic surgery: can we trust their results? Plast Reconstr Surg 144(2):519–530CrossRef
4.
5.
Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady DG, Newman TB (2007) Designing clinical research, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia
6.
7.
8.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7): e1000097
9.
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Cochrane Bias Methods Group, Cochrane Statistical Methods Group (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928
10.
11.
Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G et al (2017) AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomized or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 358:j4008CrossRef
12.
Metadata
Title
How to Avoid Making Your Systematic Review a Conventional Review Article
Authors
Osama A. Samargandi
Connor McGuire
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02185-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 6/2021 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Does Overfilling Smooth Inflatable Saline-Filled Breast Implants Decrease the Deflation Rate? Experience with 4761 Augmentation Mammaplasty Patients

Historical Notes

Do Gloves Provide Adequate Protection Against Infection?

Editor’s Invited Commentary

Invited Discussion on: Use of an Autologous Diced Cartilage Graft and Fat Graft Combination to Improve Regeneration in Rhinoplasty

Original Article

A Single-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of a New Monophasic Hyaluronic Acid Filler and Biphasic Filler in Correcting Nasolabial Fold

Review

Surgical Algorithms in Rhinoplasty: A Scoping Review of the Current Status

Letter to the Editor

Liquid Phase Concentrated Growth Factor Improves Autologous Fat Graft Survival In Vivo in Nude Mice