Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2021

01-10-2021 | Bariatric Surgery | Original Article

A Comparative Analysis of Fleur-de-Lis and Traditional Panniculectomy after Bariatric Surgery

Authors: Adrienne N. Christopher, Martin P. Morris, Viren Patel, Harrison Davis, Robyn B. Broach, John P. Fischer

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The Fleur-de-Lis panniculectomy (FdL) adds a vertical component to correct complex contour deformities after massive weight loss by addressing supra-umbilical horizontal skin excess which is not addressed with infra-umbilical transverse panniculectomy (TP). We aim to perform a head-to-head comparison of clinical outcomes and patient reported outcomes (PROs) between FdL and TP.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients ≥18 with a history of bariatric surgery undergoing FdL or TP by a single plastic surgeon between 07/01/2015 and 05/31/2020 was conducted. Surgical site occurrences (SSOs) including surgical site infection (SSI), delayed healing, cellulitis, seroma, hematoma, surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (SSOpi), and a composite of other postoperative outcomes were assessed. In addition, patient satisfaction was analyzed using the Body-Q questionnaire across 12 domains.

Results

The analysis included 56 patients; 26 and 30 patients who were treated with FdL and TP, respectively. Cohorts were statistically similar in terms of age, gender, BMI, and co-morbid conditions. The overall complication rate was 50% (FdL n = 14 (53.9%), TP n = 14 (46.7%); p = 0.592). On multivariate analysis, pannus weight was associated with the development of SSO (p = 0.04). FdL incision, however, was not an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes. Absolute improvement in PROs was similar in both cohorts across multiple domains.

Conclusion

FdL showed a comparable safety and efficacy profile to TP when performed in post-bariatric surgery patients, with equivalent improvement in PROs across multiple domains. Preoperative weight loss should be encouraged in this population as pannus weight is an independent risk factor for complications.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ et al (2011) Re: National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 million participants. J Urol Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ et al (2011) Re: National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 million participants. J Urol
4.
go back to reference Xia Q, Campbell JA, Ahmad H et al (2020) Bariatric surgery is a cost-saving treatment for obesity—a comprehensive meta-analysis and updated systematic review of health economic evaluations of bariatric surgery. Obes Rev 21. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12932 Xia Q, Campbell JA, Ahmad H et al (2020) Bariatric surgery is a cost-saving treatment for obesity—a comprehensive meta-analysis and updated systematic review of health economic evaluations of bariatric surgery. Obes Rev 21. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​obr.​12932
5.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E et al (2004) Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 292:1724–1737CrossRef Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E et al (2004) Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 292:1724–1737CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Osland E, Yunus RM, Khan S et al (2017) Weight loss outcomes in Laparoscopic Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (LVSG) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) procedures: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 27:8–18CrossRef Osland E, Yunus RM, Khan S et al (2017) Weight loss outcomes in Laparoscopic Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (LVSG) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) procedures: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 27:8–18CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Toma T, Harling L, Athanasiou T et al (2018) Does body contouring after Bariatric weight loss enhance quality of life? A systematic review of QOL studies. Obes Surg 28:3333–3341CrossRef Toma T, Harling L, Athanasiou T et al (2018) Does body contouring after Bariatric weight loss enhance quality of life? A systematic review of QOL studies. Obes Surg 28:3333–3341CrossRef
17.
go back to reference DeSerres JJ, Quaife T, Morzycki A et al (2020) Safety of Fleur-de-lis Abdominoplasty after massive weight loss. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg DeSerres JJ, Quaife T, Morzycki A et al (2020) Safety of Fleur-de-lis Abdominoplasty after massive weight loss. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg
19.
go back to reference Mitchell RTM, Rubin JP (2014) The Fleur-De-Lis abdominoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 41:673–680CrossRef Mitchell RTM, Rubin JP (2014) The Fleur-De-Lis abdominoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 41:673–680CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL et al (2019) The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL et al (2019) The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform
24.
go back to reference Shrivastava P, Aggarwal A, Khazanchi R (2008) Body contouring surgery in a massive weight loss patient: an overview. Indian J Plast Surg 41:S114CrossRef Shrivastava P, Aggarwal A, Khazanchi R (2008) Body contouring surgery in a massive weight loss patient: an overview. Indian J Plast Surg 41:S114CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hasanbegovic E, Sørensen JA (2014) Complications following body contouring surgery after massive weight loss: a meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 67:295–301CrossRef Hasanbegovic E, Sørensen JA (2014) Complications following body contouring surgery after massive weight loss: a meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 67:295–301CrossRef
29.
go back to reference O’Brien JA, Broderick GB, Hurwitz ZM et al (2012) Fleur-de-lis panniculectomy after bariatric surgery: our experience. Ann Plastic Surg O’Brien JA, Broderick GB, Hurwitz ZM et al (2012) Fleur-de-lis panniculectomy after bariatric surgery: our experience. Ann Plastic Surg
31.
go back to reference Winocour J, Gupta V, Roberto Ramirez J, et al (2015) Abdominoplasty: Risk factors, complication rates, and safety of combined procedures. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 597e–606e Winocour J, Gupta V, Roberto Ramirez J, et al (2015) Abdominoplasty: Risk factors, complication rates, and safety of combined procedures. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 597e–606e
Metadata
Title
A Comparative Analysis of Fleur-de-Lis and Traditional Panniculectomy after Bariatric Surgery
Authors
Adrienne N. Christopher
Martin P. Morris
Viren Patel
Harrison Davis
Robyn B. Broach
John P. Fischer
Publication date
01-10-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02149-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2021 Go to the issue

Original Article

Labia Minora Repair