Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2019

Open Access 01-10-2019 | Original Article

A New Tool for Breast Anthropometric Measurements: Presentation and Validation for Women and Men

Authors: Maksym Mikołajczyk, Anna Kasielska-Trojan, Bogusław Antoszewski

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Anthropometric measurements of breasts are crucial for planning surgical procedures; however, there are no practical solutions for their quick, digital performance. The aim of the study was to present and validate a self-designed web application BreastIdea (BI) designed for indirect breast anthropometry.

Methods

Ten male and 10 female volunteers had their chests measured directly according to the routine clinical practice. Then their chests were photographed in non-standardised conditions. Corresponding measurements were performed using BI. Accuracy and both relative and absolute reliability of BI measurements were investigated.

Results

Breast assessments using BI yielded highly accurate results and presented near-perfect precision when compared to direct anthropometric measurements of the breast. Indirect anthropometry eliminates the necessity to trace the body’s curves, which usually introduces a bias to linear measurements.

Conclusion

BI web application is a reliable tool for indirect breast measurements in a clinical setting, providing accurate results regardless of chest pathology and photograph standardisation.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Choppin SB, Wheat JS, Gee M et al (2016) The accuracy of breast volume measurement methods: a systematic review. Breast 28:121–129CrossRefPubMed Choppin SB, Wheat JS, Gee M et al (2016) The accuracy of breast volume measurement methods: a systematic review. Breast 28:121–129CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Westreich M (1997) Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100(2):468–479CrossRefPubMed Westreich M (1997) Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100(2):468–479CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Watmough DJ (1982) Diaphanography: mechanism responsible for the images. Acta Radiol Oncol 21(1):11–15CrossRefPubMed Watmough DJ (1982) Diaphanography: mechanism responsible for the images. Acta Radiol Oncol 21(1):11–15CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Daneshmand M, Helmi A, Avots E et al (2018) 3D scanning: a comprehensive survey. arXiv:801.08863v1 [cs.CV]. January 24, 2018. Available from: Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Accessed 22 Aug 2018 Daneshmand M, Helmi A, Avots E et al (2018) 3D scanning: a comprehensive survey. arXiv:​801.​08863v1 [cs.CV]. January 24, 2018. Available from: Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Accessed 22 Aug 2018
5.
go back to reference Quieregatto PR, Hochman B, Furtado F et al (2014) Image analysis software versus direct anthropometry for breast measurements. Acta Cir Bras 29(10):688–695CrossRefPubMed Quieregatto PR, Hochman B, Furtado F et al (2014) Image analysis software versus direct anthropometry for breast measurements. Acta Cir Bras 29(10):688–695CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Flanagan D (2011) JavaScript: the definitive guide, 6th edn. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol Flanagan D (2011) JavaScript: the definitive guide, 6th edn. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol
7.
go back to reference Mallucci P, Branford OA (2014) Population analysis of the perfect breast: a morphometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(3):436–447CrossRefPubMed Mallucci P, Branford OA (2014) Population analysis of the perfect breast: a morphometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(3):436–447CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lewin R, Amoroso M, Plate N et al (2016) The aesthetically ideal position of the nipple–areola complex on the breast. Aesth Plast Surg 40:724–732CrossRef Lewin R, Amoroso M, Plate N et al (2016) The aesthetically ideal position of the nipple–areola complex on the breast. Aesth Plast Surg 40:724–732CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bruton A, Conway JH, Holgate ST (2000) Reliability: what is it, and how is it measured? Physiotherapy 86(2):94–99CrossRef Bruton A, Conway JH, Holgate ST (2000) Reliability: what is it, and how is it measured? Physiotherapy 86(2):94–99CrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Atkinson G, Nevill AM (1998) Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 26(4):217–238CrossRefPubMed Atkinson G, Nevill AM (1998) Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 26(4):217–238CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Šerbetar I (2015) Establishing some measures of absolute and relative reliability of a motor tests. Croat J Educ 17(1):37–48 Šerbetar I (2015) Establishing some measures of absolute and relative reliability of a motor tests. Croat J Educ 17(1):37–48
13.
go back to reference Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6(4):284–290CrossRef Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6(4):284–290CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Portney LG, Watkins MP (2000) Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey Portney LG, Watkins MP (2000) Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey
15.
go back to reference Mony PK, Swaminathan S, Gajendran JK et al (2016) Quality assurance for accuracy of anthropometric measurements in clinical and epidemiological studies: [Errare humanum est = to err is human]. Indian J Community Med 41(2):98–102CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mony PK, Swaminathan S, Gajendran JK et al (2016) Quality assurance for accuracy of anthropometric measurements in clinical and epidemiological studies: [Errare humanum est = to err is human]. Indian J Community Med 41(2):98–102CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Altman DG, Bland JM (1983) Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. J R Stat Soc D 32:307–317 Altman DG, Bland JM (1983) Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. J R Stat Soc D 32:307–317
17.
go back to reference Giavarina D (2015) Understanding bland altman analysis. Biochem Med 25(2):141–151CrossRef Giavarina D (2015) Understanding bland altman analysis. Biochem Med 25(2):141–151CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Odo LM, Guimarães PA, Silva AL et al (2009) Assessing the outcome of surgical treatment of breast asymmetry by means of linear measures. Arq Catarin Med 38(Suppl. 1):43–45 Odo LM, Guimarães PA, Silva AL et al (2009) Assessing the outcome of surgical treatment of breast asymmetry by means of linear measures. Arq Catarin Med 38(Suppl. 1):43–45
19.
go back to reference Nechala P, Mahoney J, Farkas LG (1999) Digital two-dimensional photogrammetry: a comparison of three techniques of obtaining digital photographs. Plast Reconstr Surg 103(7):1819–1825CrossRefPubMed Nechala P, Mahoney J, Farkas LG (1999) Digital two-dimensional photogrammetry: a comparison of three techniques of obtaining digital photographs. Plast Reconstr Surg 103(7):1819–1825CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Pietruski P, Majak M, Dębski T et al (2017) A novel computer system for the evaluation of nasolabial morphology, symmetry and aesthetics after cleft lip and palate treatment. Part 1: general concept and validation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 45(4):491–504CrossRefPubMed Pietruski P, Majak M, Dębski T et al (2017) A novel computer system for the evaluation of nasolabial morphology, symmetry and aesthetics after cleft lip and palate treatment. Part 1: general concept and validation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 45(4):491–504CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Zancanaro C, Milanese C, Lovato C et al (2015) Reliability of three-dimensional photonic scanner anthropometry performed by skilled and naïve operators. IJEG 5(1):1–11 Zancanaro C, Milanese C, Lovato C et al (2015) Reliability of three-dimensional photonic scanner anthropometry performed by skilled and naïve operators. IJEG 5(1):1–11
22.
go back to reference Medina-Inojosa J, Somers VK, Ngwa T et al (2016) Reliability of a 3D body scanner for anthropometric measurements of central obesity. Obes Open Access 2(3):1–4 Medina-Inojosa J, Somers VK, Ngwa T et al (2016) Reliability of a 3D body scanner for anthropometric measurements of central obesity. Obes Open Access 2(3):1–4
23.
go back to reference Conkle J, Suchdev PS, Alexander E et al (2018) Accuracy and reliability of a low-cost, handheld 3D imaging system for child anthropometry. PLoS One 13(10):e0205320CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Conkle J, Suchdev PS, Alexander E et al (2018) Accuracy and reliability of a low-cost, handheld 3D imaging system for child anthropometry. PLoS One 13(10):e0205320CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Schenk T (2005) Introduction to photogrammetry, 1st edn. The Ohio State University, Columbus Schenk T (2005) Introduction to photogrammetry, 1st edn. The Ohio State University, Columbus
27.
go back to reference Hashizume K, Rosado DG, Fernández-Medina E et al (2013) An analysis of security issues for cloud computing. J Internet Serv Appl 4(5):1–1326 Hashizume K, Rosado DG, Fernández-Medina E et al (2013) An analysis of security issues for cloud computing. J Internet Serv Appl 4(5):1–1326
28.
go back to reference Gordon CC, Blackwell CL, Bradtmiller B et al (2012) Anthropometric survey of U.S. Army Personnel: methods and summary statistics. U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center, Natick Gordon CC, Blackwell CL, Bradtmiller B et al (2012) Anthropometric survey of U.S. Army Personnel: methods and summary statistics. U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center, Natick
29.
go back to reference Koepke N, Zwahlen M, Wells JC et al (2017) Comparison of 3D laser-based photonic scans and manual anthropometric measurements of body size and shape in a validation study of 123 young Swiss men. Peer J 5:e2980CrossRefPubMed Koepke N, Zwahlen M, Wells JC et al (2017) Comparison of 3D laser-based photonic scans and manual anthropometric measurements of body size and shape in a validation study of 123 young Swiss men. Peer J 5:e2980CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Parker C, Gill S, Hayes S (2017) 3D body scanning has suitable reliability: an anthropometric investigation for garment construction. In: Proceedings of 3DBODY.TECH, pp 298–305 Parker C, Gill S, Hayes S (2017) 3D body scanning has suitable reliability: an anthropometric investigation for garment construction. In: Proceedings of 3DBODY.TECH, pp 298–305
31.
go back to reference Bougourd JP, Dekker L, Grant Ross P et al (2000) A comparison of women’s sizing by 3D electronic scanning and traditional anthropometry. J Tex I 91(2):163–173 Bougourd JP, Dekker L, Grant Ross P et al (2000) A comparison of women’s sizing by 3D electronic scanning and traditional anthropometry. J Tex I 91(2):163–173
32.
go back to reference Seminati E, Canepa Talamas D, Young M et al (2017) Validity and reliability of a novel 3D scanner for assessment of the shape and volume of amputees’ residual limb models. PLoS ONE 12(9):e0184498CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Seminati E, Canepa Talamas D, Young M et al (2017) Validity and reliability of a novel 3D scanner for assessment of the shape and volume of amputees’ residual limb models. PLoS ONE 12(9):e0184498CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
A New Tool for Breast Anthropometric Measurements: Presentation and Validation for Women and Men
Authors
Maksym Mikołajczyk
Anna Kasielska-Trojan
Bogusław Antoszewski
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01467-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2019 Go to the issue