Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2019

01-08-2019 | Breast Augmentation | Original Article

Surgeons’ Dilemma: Treatment of Implant-Associated Infection in the Cosmetic Breast Augmentation Patient

Authors: Vasileios Vasilakis, Feras Yamin, Richard G. Reish

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Augmentation mammaplasty is the most common plastic surgical procedure performed in the USA. The management of severe implant-associated infection is a challenge, and the traditional two-stage treatment is associated with significant limitations. The aim of this literature review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of all studies dealing with the management of severe infection or implant exposure following cosmetic breast augmentation.

Methods

The PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched through February 2018 for studies on the management of severe infection and threatened or actual implant exposure following primary augmentation mammaplasty. Search terms used were “breast implant,” “breast prosthesis,” “breast augmentation,” “breast augmentation complications,” “infected implant,” “implant salvage” and “implant exposure.”

Results

Five articles met inclusion criteria. There was inconsistency in the reporting of several key factors, such as the antibiotic regimens employed, culture sensitivities, time from diagnosis to treatment, implant characteristics, as well as the precise treatment of the capsule and pocket. A total of 58 implants were treated, of which 37 (63.8%) were exposed in the setting of infection and 21 (36.2%) were infected without exposure. One-stage implant salvage was employed in 31 implants and was successful in all. The capsular contracture rate with this approach was 6.5%. Antibiotic-alone, non-operative treatment was employed in the salvage of 22 implants, with success and capsular contracture rates of 77.3 and 13.6%, respectively. In the setting of severe periprosthetic infection in the absence of implant exposure, antibiotic-alone treatment was successful in the salvage of 13 out of 14 implants (92.9%).

Conclusions

The inconsistency and paucity of the data in the literature preclude definitive conclusions with regard to the optimal management of the threatened implant following augmentation mammaplasty. Given the excellent salvage rates in this setting, a more prominent role and liberal utilization of implant salvage are proposed.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Araco A, Gravante G, Araco F, Delogu D, Cervelli V, Walgenbach K (2007) A retrospective analysis of 3000 primary aesthetic breast augmentations: postoperative complications and associated factors. Aesthet Plast Surg 31(5):532–539CrossRef Araco A, Gravante G, Araco F, Delogu D, Cervelli V, Walgenbach K (2007) A retrospective analysis of 3000 primary aesthetic breast augmentations: postoperative complications and associated factors. Aesthet Plast Surg 31(5):532–539CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Araco A, Gravante G, Araco F, Delogu D, Cervelli V, Walgenbach K (2007) Infections of breast implants in aesthetic breast augmentations: a single-center review of 3002 patients. Aesthet Plast Surg 31(4):325–329CrossRef Araco A, Gravante G, Araco F, Delogu D, Cervelli V, Walgenbach K (2007) Infections of breast implants in aesthetic breast augmentations: a single-center review of 3002 patients. Aesthet Plast Surg 31(4):325–329CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Alderman AK, Collins ED, Streu R, Grotting JC, Sulkin AL, Neligan P, Haeck PC, Gutowski KA (2009) Benchmarking outcomes in plastic surgery: national complication rates for abdominoplasty and breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(6):2127–2133CrossRef Alderman AK, Collins ED, Streu R, Grotting JC, Sulkin AL, Neligan P, Haeck PC, Gutowski KA (2009) Benchmarking outcomes in plastic surgery: national complication rates for abdominoplasty and breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(6):2127–2133CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kjoller K, Holmich LR, Jacobsen PH, Friis S, Fryzek J, McLaughlin JK, Lipworth L, Henriksen TF, Jorgensen S, Bittmann S, Olsen JH (2002) Epidemiological investigation of local complications after cosmetic breast implant surgery in Denmark. Ann Plast Surg 48(3):229–237CrossRef Kjoller K, Holmich LR, Jacobsen PH, Friis S, Fryzek J, McLaughlin JK, Lipworth L, Henriksen TF, Jorgensen S, Bittmann S, Olsen JH (2002) Epidemiological investigation of local complications after cosmetic breast implant surgery in Denmark. Ann Plast Surg 48(3):229–237CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Washer LL, Gutowski K (2012) Breast implant infections. Infect Dis Clin N Am 26(1):111–125CrossRef Washer LL, Gutowski K (2012) Breast implant infections. Infect Dis Clin N Am 26(1):111–125CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Spear SL, Seruya M (2010) Management of the infected or exposed breast prosthesis: a single surgeon’s 15-year experience with 69 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(4):1074–1084CrossRef Spear SL, Seruya M (2010) Management of the infected or exposed breast prosthesis: a single surgeon’s 15-year experience with 69 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(4):1074–1084CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM, Anastasi GW (1979) The fate of breast implants with infections around them. Plast Reconstr Surg 63(6):812–816CrossRef Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM, Anastasi GW (1979) The fate of breast implants with infections around them. Plast Reconstr Surg 63(6):812–816CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Perras C (1965) The prevention and treatment of infections following breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 35:649–656CrossRef Perras C (1965) The prevention and treatment of infections following breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 35:649–656CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Planas J, Carbonell A, Planas J (1995) Salvaging the exposed mammary prosthesis. Aesthet Plast Surg 19:535–540CrossRef Planas J, Carbonell A, Planas J (1995) Salvaging the exposed mammary prosthesis. Aesthet Plast Surg 19:535–540CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Azouz V, Mirhaidari S, Wagner DS (2018) Defining infection in breast reconstruction: a literature review. Ann Plast Surg 80(5):587–591PubMed Azouz V, Mirhaidari S, Wagner DS (2018) Defining infection in breast reconstruction: a literature review. Ann Plast Surg 80(5):587–591PubMed
12.
go back to reference Spear SL, Howard MA, Boehmler JH, Ducic I, Low M, Abbruzzesse MR (2004) The infected or exposed breast implant: management and treatment strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(6):1634–1644CrossRef Spear SL, Howard MA, Boehmler JH, Ducic I, Low M, Abbruzzesse MR (2004) The infected or exposed breast implant: management and treatment strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(6):1634–1644CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sforza M, Andjelkov K, Husein R, Zaccheddu R (2014) Will 1-stage implant salvage after periprosthetic breast infection ever be routine? A 6-year successful experience. Aesthet Surg J 34(8):1172–1178CrossRef Sforza M, Andjelkov K, Husein R, Zaccheddu R (2014) Will 1-stage implant salvage after periprosthetic breast infection ever be routine? A 6-year successful experience. Aesthet Surg J 34(8):1172–1178CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Khan UD (2010) Breast augmentation, antibiotic prophylaxis, and infection: comparative analysis of 1628 primary augmentation mammoplasties assessing the role and efficacy of antibiotics prophylaxis duration. Aesthet Plast Surg 34(1):42–47CrossRef Khan UD (2010) Breast augmentation, antibiotic prophylaxis, and infection: comparative analysis of 1628 primary augmentation mammoplasties assessing the role and efficacy of antibiotics prophylaxis duration. Aesthet Plast Surg 34(1):42–47CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Reish RG, Damjanovic B, Austen WG Jr, Winograd J, Liao EC, Cetrulo CL, Balkin DM, Colwell AS (2013) Infection following implant-based reconstruction in 1952 consecutive breast reconstructions: salvage rates and predictors of success. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(6):1223–1230CrossRef Reish RG, Damjanovic B, Austen WG Jr, Winograd J, Liao EC, Cetrulo CL, Balkin DM, Colwell AS (2013) Infection following implant-based reconstruction in 1952 consecutive breast reconstructions: salvage rates and predictors of success. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(6):1223–1230CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Weber J Jr, Hentz RV (1986) Salvage of the exposed breast implant. Ann Plast Surg 16(2):106–110CrossRef Weber J Jr, Hentz RV (1986) Salvage of the exposed breast implant. Ann Plast Surg 16(2):106–110CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fodor L, Ramon Y, Ullmann Y, Eldor L, Peled IJ (2003) Fate of exposed breast implants in augmentation mammoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 50(5):447–449CrossRef Fodor L, Ramon Y, Ullmann Y, Eldor L, Peled IJ (2003) Fate of exposed breast implants in augmentation mammoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 50(5):447–449CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Basile AR, Basile F, Basile AV (2005) Late infection following breast augmentation with textured silicone gel-filled implants. Aesthet Surg J 25(3):249–254CrossRef Basile AR, Basile F, Basile AV (2005) Late infection following breast augmentation with textured silicone gel-filled implants. Aesthet Surg J 25(3):249–254CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Surgeons’ Dilemma: Treatment of Implant-Associated Infection in the Cosmetic Breast Augmentation Patient
Authors
Vasileios Vasilakis
Feras Yamin
Richard G. Reish
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01369-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2019 Go to the issue