Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 6/2017

01-12-2017 | Original Article

Volumetric Mammogram Assessment: A Helpful Tool in the Treatment of Breast Asymmetries

Authors: Oscar A. Zimman, Carlos D. Butto, Román Rostagno, Camila Rostagno

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The surgical approach to breast asymmetry depends on several factors, including the surgeon’s experience, the anatomy of the patient, and several methods that may help to choose a technique and define the size of the implant or the amount of breast tissue to be excised. The aim of this study is to assist in evaluation of breast volumes with the Quantra™ software application, intended for use with Hologic™ digital mammography systems. Twenty-eight women were studied with full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with the Quantra™ software application, for use with Hologic™ digital mammography systems preoperatively. The case diagnoses were as follows: breast hypertrophy, ptosis, hypoplasia, and reconstruction, and the surgeries included breast reduction, mastopexy, mastopexy and breast reduction, mastoplasty and breast augmentation, breast augmentation, and immediate or delayed breast reconstruction. Patients were evaluated from 6 to 18 months after surgery. Volumetric mammogram studies help to decide the amount of tissue to be excised, the size of the implants, and the combination of both. The results of this study were evaluated by surgeons and patients and found to be highly satisfactory. The use of full-field digital mammography with adequate software should be considered as another tool to assist in making decisions regarding the correction of breast asymmetries.
Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng JZ, Klatsky S, Mansonn P (2002) Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:58–70CrossRefPubMed Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng JZ, Klatsky S, Mansonn P (2002) Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:58–70CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference BodyLogic ® (2016) System user guide, Mentor BodyLogic ® (2016) System user guide, Mentor
3.
go back to reference MENTOR® (2015) Breast implant selection tool for Iphone/Ipad, by Mentor Worldwide LLC MENTOR® (2015) Breast implant selection tool for Iphone/Ipad, by Mentor Worldwide LLC
4.
go back to reference MENTOR® (2015) Breast implant selection tool for android, by Mentor Worldwide LLC MENTOR® (2015) Breast implant selection tool for android, by Mentor Worldwide LLC
5.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB, Adams WP Jr (2006) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: The high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(7S):35SCrossRefPubMed Tebbetts JB, Adams WP Jr (2006) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: The high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(7S):35SCrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Edstrom LE, Robson MC, Wright JK (1977) A method for the evaluation of minor degrees of breast asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 60:812–814CrossRefPubMed Edstrom LE, Robson MC, Wright JK (1977) A method for the evaluation of minor degrees of breast asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 60:812–814CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gorney M, Harries T (1974) The preoperative and postoperative consideration of natural facial asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 54:187–191CrossRefPubMed Gorney M, Harries T (1974) The preoperative and postoperative consideration of natural facial asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 54:187–191CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Chang JB, Small KH, Choi M, Karp NS (2015) Three-dime plastic surgery: practical applications and beyond. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:1295–1304CrossRefPubMed Chang JB, Small KH, Choi M, Karp NS (2015) Three-dime plastic surgery: practical applications and beyond. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:1295–1304CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Tzou CH, Artner NM, Pona I et al (2014) Comparison of three-dimensional surface-imaging systems. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67:489–497CrossRefPubMed Tzou CH, Artner NM, Pona I et al (2014) Comparison of three-dimensional surface-imaging systems. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67:489–497CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kin H, Mun G-H, Wiraatmadja ES et al (2015) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetry for immediate breast reconstruction. Aesth Plast Surg 39:369–376CrossRef Kin H, Mun G-H, Wiraatmadja ES et al (2015) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetry for immediate breast reconstruction. Aesth Plast Surg 39:369–376CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hologic Company (2010) R2 Cenova 1.3. DICOM conformance statement. Digital Mammography, pp 40 (private code definition) Hologic Company (2010) R2 Cenova 1.3. DICOM conformance statement. Digital Mammography, pp 40 (private code definition)
12.
go back to reference Pawluczyk O, Augustine BJ, Yaffe MJ et al (2003) A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms. Med Phys 30:352–364CrossRefPubMed Pawluczyk O, Augustine BJ, Yaffe MJ et al (2003) A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms. Med Phys 30:352–364CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lokate M, Kallenberg MGJ, Karssemeijer N et al (2010) Volumetric breast density from full-field digital mammograms and its association with breast cancer risk factors: a comparison with a threshold method. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 19:3096CrossRef Lokate M, Kallenberg MGJ, Karssemeijer N et al (2010) Volumetric breast density from full-field digital mammograms and its association with breast cancer risk factors: a comparison with a threshold method. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 19:3096CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rohrich RJ, Hartley W, Brown S (2006) Incidence of breast and chest wall asymmetry in breast augmentation: a retrospective analysis of 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(7S):7SPubMed Rohrich RJ, Hartley W, Brown S (2006) Incidence of breast and chest wall asymmetry in breast augmentation: a retrospective analysis of 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(7S):7SPubMed
15.
go back to reference Zimman OA (2013) Volumetric mammogram assessment. A helpful tool in the treatment of breast asymmetries. In: Presented at the 17th IPRAS world congress, Santiago, Chile Zimman OA (2013) Volumetric mammogram assessment. A helpful tool in the treatment of breast asymmetries. In: Presented at the 17th IPRAS world congress, Santiago, Chile
16.
go back to reference Jurado J (1976) Plásticas mamárias de redução baseadas em retalho dérmico vertical monopediculado. Anais XII Congresso Brasileiro de Cirurgia Plástica, pp 29 Jurado J (1976) Plásticas mamárias de redução baseadas em retalho dérmico vertical monopediculado. Anais XII Congresso Brasileiro de Cirurgia Plástica, pp 29
17.
go back to reference Adams WP Jr, McKee D (2016) Matching the implant to the breast: a systematic review of implant size selection systems for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 138:987–994CrossRefPubMed Adams WP Jr, McKee D (2016) Matching the implant to the breast: a systematic review of implant size selection systems for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 138:987–994CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Tepper OM, Small KH, Unger JG et al (2009) 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions. Ann Plast Surg 62:570–575CrossRefPubMed Tepper OM, Small KH, Unger JG et al (2009) 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions. Ann Plast Surg 62:570–575CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Liu C, Luan J, Mu L, Ji K (2010) The role of three-dimensional scanning technique in evaluation of breast asymmetry in breast augmentation: a 100-case study. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2125–2132CrossRefPubMed Liu C, Luan J, Mu L, Ji K (2010) The role of three-dimensional scanning technique in evaluation of breast asymmetry in breast augmentation: a 100-case study. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2125–2132CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Tepper OM, Small K, Rudolph L, Choi M, Karp N (2006) Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Am J Surg 192:548–551CrossRefPubMed Tepper OM, Small K, Rudolph L, Choi M, Karp N (2006) Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Am J Surg 192:548–551CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Choi M, Small K, Levovitz C, Lee C, Fadl A, Karp NS (2013) The volumetric analysis of fat graft survival in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:185–191CrossRefPubMed Choi M, Small K, Levovitz C, Lee C, Fadl A, Karp NS (2013) The volumetric analysis of fat graft survival in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:185–191CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Donfrancesco A, Montemurro P, Hedén P (2013) Three-dimensional simulated images in breast augmentation surgery: an investigation of patients’ satisfaction and the correlation between prediction and actual outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:810–822CrossRefPubMed Donfrancesco A, Montemurro P, Hedén P (2013) Three-dimensional simulated images in breast augmentation surgery: an investigation of patients’ satisfaction and the correlation between prediction and actual outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:810–822CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Pallara T, Signoretti M, Cagli B, Cogliandro A, Marangi GF, Persichetti P (2013) The volumetric analysis of fat graft survival in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:668e–669eCrossRefPubMed Pallara T, Signoretti M, Cagli B, Cogliandro A, Marangi GF, Persichetti P (2013) The volumetric analysis of fat graft survival in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:668e–669eCrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Baskin B (2015) Invited commentary for “Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetry for immediate breast reconstruction”. Aesth Plast Surg 39:377–378CrossRef Baskin B (2015) Invited commentary for “Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetry for immediate breast reconstruction”. Aesth Plast Surg 39:377–378CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Volumetric Mammogram Assessment: A Helpful Tool in the Treatment of Breast Asymmetries
Authors
Oscar A. Zimman
Carlos D. Butto
Román Rostagno
Camila Rostagno
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0940-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 6/2017 Go to the issue