Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2017

01-06-2017 | Original Article

Surgeon-Manipulated Live Surgery Video Recording Apparatuses: Personal Experience and Review of Literature

Author: Emin Kapi

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Visual recording of surgical procedures is a method that is used quite frequently in practices of plastic surgery. While presentations containing photographs are quite common in education seminars and congresses, video-containing presentations find more favour. For this reason, the presentation of surgical procedures in the form of real-time video display has increased especially recently. Appropriate technical equipment for video recording is not available in most hospitals, so there is a need to set up external apparatus in the operating room. Among these apparatuses can be listed such options as head-mounted video cameras, chest-mounted cameras, and tripod-mountable cameras. The head-mounted video camera is an apparatus that is capable of capturing high-resolution and detailed close-up footage. The tripod-mountable camera enables video capturing from a fixed point. Certain user-specific modifications can be made to overcome some of these restrictions. Among these modifications, custom-made applications are one of the most effective solutions.

Methods

The article makes an attempt to present the features and experiences concerning the use of a combination of a head- or chest-mounted action camera, a custom-made portable tripod apparatus of versatile features, and an underwater camera.

Results

The descriptions we used are quite easy-to-assembly, quickly installed, and inexpensive apparatuses that do not require specific technical knowledge and can be manipulated by the surgeon personally in all procedures.

Conclusion

The author believes that video recording apparatuses will be integrated more to the operating room, become a standard practice, and become more enabling for self-manipulation by the surgeon in the near future.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Workman J, Vrabel C (1999) Evaluating and selecting video equipment for the OR. AORN J 70:1025–1028CrossRefPubMed
2.
Geis WP (1996) Head-mounted video monitor for global visual access in mini-invasive surgery. An initial report. Surg Endosc 10:768–770CrossRefPubMed
3.
Tsunoda K, Tsunoda A, Ishimoto S, Kimura S (2006) Clinical applications of commercially available video recording and monitoring systems: inexpensive, high quality video recording and monitoring systems for endoscopy and microsurgery. Surg Technol Int 15:41–43PubMed
4.
Sugamoto Y, Hamamoto Y, Kimura M, Fukunaga T, Tasaki K, Asai Y, Takeshita N, Maruyama T, Hosokawa T, Tamachi T, Aoyama H, Matsubara H (2015) A novel method for real-time audio recording with intraoperative video. J Surg Educ 72:795–802CrossRefPubMed
5.
Makhni EC, Jobin CM, Levine WN, Ahmad CS (2015) Using wearable technology to record surgical videos. Am J Orthop 44:163–166PubMed
6.
Nakayama H, Masuda H, Fukuzawa M (2004) Recording of surgery with two crane-type tripods and video cameras. Int Surg 89:217–220PubMed
7.
Nair AG, Kamal S, Dave TV, Mishra K, Reddy HS, Della Rocca D, Della Rocca RC, Andron A, Jain V (2016) Surgeon point-of-view recording: using a high-definition head-mounted video camera in the operating room. Indian J Ophthalmol 63:771–774CrossRef
8.
Graves SN, Shenaq DS, Langerman AJ (2015) Video capture of plastic surgery procedures using the GoPro HERO3+. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3:312CrossRef
9.
Horgmo QH, Danielsen HE (2012) A camera support for operating theatre videography. J Vis Commun Med 35:20–24CrossRefPubMed
10.
Kucuker I, Keles MK, Aydogdu IO (2013) An easy and applicable method for capturing high-quality rhinoplasty videos: handle banded camcorder. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:1082–1084CrossRef
11.
Matsumoto S, Sekine K, Yamazaki M, Funabiki T, Orita T, Shimizu M, Kitano M (2013) Digital video recording in trauma surgery using commercially available equipment. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 21:27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Levin D, Tan S (2015) Black box audio/video recording in the operating room: time for anesthesiologists to get with the picture. Can J Anesth 62:937–938CrossRefPubMed
13.
Bizzotto N, Sandri A, Lavini F, Dall’Oca C, Regis D (2014) Video in operating room: GoPro HERO3 camera on surgeon’s head to film operations—a test. Surg Innov 21:338–340CrossRefPubMed
14.
Warrian KJ, Ashenhurst M, Gooi A, Gooi P (2015) A novel combination point-of-view (POV) action camera recording to capture the surgical field and instrument ergonomics in oculoplastic surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 31:321–322CrossRefPubMed
15.
Jaberoo MC, Saleh HA (2008) A novel appliance for intra-operative filming of rhinoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol 33:383–384CrossRef
16.
Silas MR, Grassia P, Langerman A (2015) Video recording of the operating room—is anonymity possible? J Surg Res 197:272–276CrossRefPubMed
17.
Xiao Y, Schimpff S, Mackenzie C, Merrell R, Entin E, Voigt R, Jarrell B (2007) Video technology to advance safety in the operating room and perioperative environment. Surg Innov 14:52–61CrossRefPubMed
18.
Chen CM, Lee KT, Shen YH (2009) Simple method to record high-quality surgical videos. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:489–496
19.
Lee B, Chen BR, Chen BB, Lu JY, Giannotta SL (2015) Recording stereoscopic 3D neurosurgery with a head-mounted 3D camera system. Br J Neurosurg 29:371–373CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Surgeon-Manipulated Live Surgery Video Recording Apparatuses: Personal Experience and Review of Literature
Author
Emin Kapi
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0826-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2017 Go to the issue

Case Report

Delayed-Onset Edematous Foreign Body Granulomas 40 Years After Augmentation Rhinoplasty by Silicone Implant Combined with Liquid Silicone Injection

Editor's Invited Commentary

Indications of Transconjunctival Orbital Septum Fat Release and Preservation for Orbitopalpebral Sulcus in Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty

Original Article

Surgical Masculinization of the Breast: Clinical Classification and Surgical Procedures

Review

Anatomy and Aesthetics of the Labia Minora: The Ideal Vulva?

Original Article

Computed Tomographic Angiography-Based Characterization of Source Blood Vessels for Nipple–Areola Complex Perfusion in Hypertrophic Breasts

Original Article

Frontal Changes in the Lower Face After Clockwise Rotation of the Maxillomandibular Complex Without Perisurgical Orthodontic Treatment in Angle Class I and Skeletal Class III Women