Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2016

01-08-2016 | Original Article

Autoaugmentation Mastopexy Modification Prevents Bottoming-Out Deformity and Areola Distortion: A Preliminary Report

Author: Safvet Ors

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Ptotic breast deformity results from involution of breast parenchyma and leads to a loss of volume, along with a converse laxity of the skin envelope. As the breast tissue descends inferiorly with gravity, there is an apparent volume loss in the upper pole and the central breast, and the lower pole becomes fuller and often wider. This study presents modifications for a well-known mastopexy technique which provides not only autoaugmentation for the breast but also suspension for the breast parenchyma and reduces bottoming-out deformity, and also obtains a regular areola shape in all types of breasts.

Patients and Methods

The modifications involve 2–4 cm subareolar crescentic incisions for regular areolas and cylindrical excision of the recipient area in the superior medial and lateral pillars for wide flaps in medium and large-size breasts.

Results

The present study included 63 female patients, with an average body mass index of 25.5 ± 2.0 kg/m2, aged 26–47 years (average 35 years). The author performed vertical scar mastopexy and augmented the breasts with a distal-based flap of deepithelialized dermoglandular tissue inserted beneath the breast parenchyma of a superior-based nipple-areolar complex pedicle.

Conclusions

In this study, modifications included subareolar crescentic incisions and cylindrical excisions in the superior medial and lateral pillar regions. This technique produced satisfactory results for all types of breasts in terms of good breast shape, natural image at the upper pole of the breast, good projection, and reduced bottoming-out deformity. This simple modified technique maintained the size of the breasts and avoided augmentation by breast implants.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis. Definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3(2):193–203PubMed Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis. Definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3(2):193–203PubMed
2.
go back to reference Wueringer E, Tschabitscher M (2002) New aspects of the topographical anatomy of the mammary gland regarding its neurovascular supply along a regular ligamentous suspension. Eur J Morphol 40:181–189CrossRefPubMed Wueringer E, Tschabitscher M (2002) New aspects of the topographical anatomy of the mammary gland regarding its neurovascular supply along a regular ligamentous suspension. Eur J Morphol 40:181–189CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Gonzales-Ulloa M (1960) Correction of hypotrophy of the breast by exogenous material. Plast Reconstr Surg 25:15CrossRef Gonzales-Ulloa M (1960) Correction of hypotrophy of the breast by exogenous material. Plast Reconstr Surg 25:15CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Regnault P (1966) The hypoplastic and ptotic breast: a combined operation with prosthetic augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 37:31CrossRefPubMed Regnault P (1966) The hypoplastic and ptotic breast: a combined operation with prosthetic augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 37:31CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Owsley JQ Jr (1975) Simultaneous mastopexy and augmentation for correction of the small, ptotic breast. Ann Plast Surg 2:195CrossRef Owsley JQ Jr (1975) Simultaneous mastopexy and augmentation for correction of the small, ptotic breast. Ann Plast Surg 2:195CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Menon N (2004) One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesthet Plast Surg 28(5):259–267CrossRef Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Menon N (2004) One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesthet Plast Surg 28(5):259–267CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Johnson GW (1981) Central core reduction mammoplasties and Marlex suspension of breast tissue. Aesthet Plast Surg 5(1):77–84CrossRef Johnson GW (1981) Central core reduction mammoplasties and Marlex suspension of breast tissue. Aesthet Plast Surg 5(1):77–84CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Goés JCS (1992) Periareolar mammplasty: double-skin technique with application of Polyglactine 910 mesh. Rev Soc Bras Cir Plast. 7:1–341 Goés JCS (1992) Periareolar mammplasty: double-skin technique with application of Polyglactine 910 mesh. Rev Soc Bras Cir Plast. 7:1–341
10.
go back to reference Goés JCS (1996) Periareolar mammaplasty: double skin technique with application of polyglactine or mixed mesh. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:959–968CrossRefPubMed Goés JCS (1996) Periareolar mammaplasty: double skin technique with application of polyglactine or mixed mesh. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:959–968CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Goés JCS (1998) Periareolar mastopexy and reduction with mesh support. Breast Surg 51:697–708 Goés JCS (1998) Periareolar mastopexy and reduction with mesh support. Breast Surg 51:697–708
12.
go back to reference Goés JCS (2003) Periareolar mastopexy: double skin technique with mesh support. Aesthet Surg J 3:129–135CrossRef Goés JCS (2003) Periareolar mastopexy: double skin technique with mesh support. Aesthet Surg J 3:129–135CrossRef
13.
go back to reference de Bruijn HP, Johannes S (2008) Mastopexy with 3D preshaped mesh for long-term results: development of the internal bra system. Aesthet Plast Surg 32:757–765CrossRef de Bruijn HP, Johannes S (2008) Mastopexy with 3D preshaped mesh for long-term results: development of the internal bra system. Aesthet Plast Surg 32:757–765CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Benelli L (1990) A new periareolar mammaplasty: the “round block” technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 14(2):93–100CrossRef Benelli L (1990) A new periareolar mammaplasty: the “round block” technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 14(2):93–100CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Weiss PR, Ship AG (1995) Restoration of breast contour with autologous tissue after removal of implants. Ann Plast Surg 34(3):236–241CrossRefPubMed Weiss PR, Ship AG (1995) Restoration of breast contour with autologous tissue after removal of implants. Ann Plast Surg 34(3):236–241CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Flowers RS, Smith EM Jr (1998) “Flip-flap” mastopexy. Aesthet Plast Surg 22(6):425–429CrossRef Flowers RS, Smith EM Jr (1998) “Flip-flap” mastopexy. Aesthet Plast Surg 22(6):425–429CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hall-Findlay EJ (1999) A simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty: shortening the learning curve. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(3):748–759CrossRefPubMed Hall-Findlay EJ (1999) A simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty: shortening the learning curve. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(3):748–759CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lejour M (1993) Vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:985–986PubMed Lejour M (1993) Vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:985–986PubMed
19.
go back to reference Graf R, Biggs TM, Steely RL (2000) Breast shape: a technique for better upper pole fullness. Aesthet Plast Surg. 24:348–352CrossRef Graf R, Biggs TM, Steely RL (2000) Breast shape: a technique for better upper pole fullness. Aesthet Plast Surg. 24:348–352CrossRef
20.
21.
go back to reference Hönig JF, Frey HP, Hasse FM, Hasselberg J (2009) Autoaugmentation Mastopexy with an Inferior-Based Pedicle. Aesthet Plast Surg. 33:302–307CrossRef Hönig JF, Frey HP, Hasse FM, Hasselberg J (2009) Autoaugmentation Mastopexy with an Inferior-Based Pedicle. Aesthet Plast Surg. 33:302–307CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gümüş N (2013) A versatile modification of dermoglandular hammock flap for mastopexy: extended hammock. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 47(4):252–257CrossRefPubMed Gümüş N (2013) A versatile modification of dermoglandular hammock flap for mastopexy: extended hammock. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 47(4):252–257CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Brink RR (2000) Evaluating breast parenchymal maldistribution with regard to mastopexy augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(2):491CrossRefPubMed Brink RR (2000) Evaluating breast parenchymal maldistribution with regard to mastopexy augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(2):491CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Scott LS, Gerald HP, Sharon YG (2000) Simultaneous breast augmentation and mastopexy. Aesthet Surg J. 20(2):155–164CrossRef Scott LS, Gerald HP, Sharon YG (2000) Simultaneous breast augmentation and mastopexy. Aesthet Surg J. 20(2):155–164CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Spear SL, Low M, Ducic I (2003) Revision augmentation mastopexy: indications, operations, and outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 51:540–546CrossRefPubMed Spear SL, Low M, Ducic I (2003) Revision augmentation mastopexy: indications, operations, and outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 51:540–546CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Menon N (2004) One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesthet Plast Surg. 28:259–267CrossRef Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Menon N (2004) One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesthet Plast Surg. 28:259–267CrossRef
27.
28.
go back to reference Ribeiro L, Accorsi A Jr, Buss A, Marcal-Pessoa M (2002) Creation and evolution of 30 years of the inferior pedicle in reduction mammaplasties. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:960–970CrossRefPubMed Ribeiro L, Accorsi A Jr, Buss A, Marcal-Pessoa M (2002) Creation and evolution of 30 years of the inferior pedicle in reduction mammaplasties. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:960–970CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Fayman MS (1998) Short Scar Mastopexy with Flap Transposition. Aesthet Plast Surg. 22:135–141CrossRef Fayman MS (1998) Short Scar Mastopexy with Flap Transposition. Aesthet Plast Surg. 22:135–141CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Autoaugmentation Mastopexy Modification Prevents Bottoming-Out Deformity and Areola Distortion: A Preliminary Report
Author
Safvet Ors
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0652-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2016 Go to the issue