Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2015

01-10-2015 | Original Article

The In Vivo Pericapsular Tissue Response to Modern Polyurethane Breast Implants

Authors: James Frame, Dia Kamel, Marcelo Olivan, Henrique Cintra

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Polyurethane breast implants were first introduced by Ashley (Plast Reconstr Surg 45:421–424, 1970), with the intention of trying to reduce the high incidence of capsular contracture associated with smooth shelled, high gel bleed, silicone breast implants. The sterilization of the polyurethane foam in the early days was questionable. More recently, ethylene oxide (ETO)-sterilized polyurethane has been used in the manufacturing process and this has been shown to reduce the incidence of biofilm. The improved method of attachment of polyurethane onto the underlying high cohesive gel, barrier shell layered, silicone breast implants also encourages bio-integration. Polyurethane covered, cohesive gel, silicone implants have also been shown to reduce the incidence of other problems commonly associated with smooth or textured silicone implants, especially with reference to displacement, capsular contracture, seroma, reoperation, biofilm and implant rupture. Since the introduction of the conical polyurethane implant (Silimed, Brazil) into the United Kingdom in 2009 (Eurosurgical, UK), we have had the opportunity to review histology taken from the capsules of polyurethane implants in three women ranging from a few months to over 3 years after implantation. All implants had been inserted into virgin subfascial, extra-pectoral planes. The results add to the important previously described histological findings of Bassetto et al. (Aesthet Plast Surg 34:481–485, 2010). Five distinct layers are identified and reasons for the development of each layer are discussed. Breast capsule around polyurethane implants, in situ for fifteen and 20 years, has recently been obtained and analysed in Brazil, and the histology has been incorporated into this study. After 20 years, the polyurethane is almost undetectable and capsular contracture may appear. These findings contribute to our understanding of polyurethane implant safety, and give reasoning for a significant reduction in clinical capsular contracture rate, up to 10 years after implantation, compared to contemporary silicone implants. A more permanent matrix equivalent to polyurethane may be the solution for reducing long-term capsular contracture.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ashley FL (1970) A new type of breast prosthesis; preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 45:421–424CrossRefPubMed Ashley FL (1970) A new type of breast prosthesis; preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 45:421–424CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Adams WP Jr (2009) Capsular contracture: what is it? How can it be prevented and managed? Clin Plast Surg 36:119–126CrossRefPubMed Adams WP Jr (2009) Capsular contracture: what is it? How can it be prevented and managed? Clin Plast Surg 36:119–126CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Wixtrom RN, Stutman RL, Burke RM, Mahoney BS, Codner MA (2012) Risk of breast implant bacterial contamination from endogenous breast flora, prevention with nipple shields, and implications for biofilm formation. Aesthet Surg J 32(8):956–963CrossRefPubMed Wixtrom RN, Stutman RL, Burke RM, Mahoney BS, Codner MA (2012) Risk of breast implant bacterial contamination from endogenous breast flora, prevention with nipple shields, and implications for biofilm formation. Aesthet Surg J 32(8):956–963CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Dancey A, Nassimizadeh A, Levick P (2012) Capsular contracture: what are the risk factors? A 14 year series of 1400 consecutive augmentations. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(2):213–218CrossRefPubMed Dancey A, Nassimizadeh A, Levick P (2012) Capsular contracture: what are the risk factors? A 14 year series of 1400 consecutive augmentations. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(2):213–218CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hester TR (1998) The polyurethane-covered mammary prosthesis: facts and fiction. Perspect Plast Surg 2:135 Hester TR (1998) The polyurethane-covered mammary prosthesis: facts and fiction. Perspect Plast Surg 2:135
6.
go back to reference Gasperoni C, Salgarello M, Gargani G (1992) Polyurethane-covered mammary implants: a 12-year experience. Ann Plast Surg 29:303–308CrossRefPubMed Gasperoni C, Salgarello M, Gargani G (1992) Polyurethane-covered mammary implants: a 12-year experience. Ann Plast Surg 29:303–308CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Fleming D (2012) Polyurethane foam breast implants. In: Peters W, Brandon H, Jerina KL, Wolf C, Young VL (eds) Biomaterials in plastic surgery: breast implants. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge Fleming D (2012) Polyurethane foam breast implants. In: Peters W, Brandon H, Jerina KL, Wolf C, Young VL (eds) Biomaterials in plastic surgery: breast implants. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge
8.
go back to reference De la Pena-Salcedo JA, Soto-Miranda MA, Lopez-Salguero JF (2012) Back to the future: a 15 year experience with polyurethane foam-covered breast implants using the partial sub-fascial technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:331–338CrossRef De la Pena-Salcedo JA, Soto-Miranda MA, Lopez-Salguero JF (2012) Back to the future: a 15 year experience with polyurethane foam-covered breast implants using the partial sub-fascial technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:331–338CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bassetto F, Scarpa C, Caccialanza E, Montesco MC, Magnani P (2010) Histological features of periprosthetic mammary capsules: silicone vs. polyurethane. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:481–485CrossRef Bassetto F, Scarpa C, Caccialanza E, Montesco MC, Magnani P (2010) Histological features of periprosthetic mammary capsules: silicone vs. polyurethane. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:481–485CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Vasquez G, Pellon A (2007) Polyurethane: coated silicone gel breast implants used for 18 years. Aesthet Plast Surg 31:330–336CrossRef Vasquez G, Pellon A (2007) Polyurethane: coated silicone gel breast implants used for 18 years. Aesthet Plast Surg 31:330–336CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hart AM, Lechowicz MJ, Peters KK, Holden J, Carlson GW (2014) Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma: report of 2 cases and review of the literature. Aesthet Surg J 34(6):884–894CrossRefPubMed Hart AM, Lechowicz MJ, Peters KK, Holden J, Carlson GW (2014) Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma: report of 2 cases and review of the literature. Aesthet Surg J 34(6):884–894CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Georgeu GA, Frame JD, Frame JD (2013) Conical polyurethane implants: an uplifting augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 33(8):1116–1128CrossRefPubMed Georgeu GA, Frame JD, Frame JD (2013) Conical polyurethane implants: an uplifting augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 33(8):1116–1128CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Barr S, Hill E, Bayat A (2009) Current implant surface technology: an examination of their nanostructure and their influence on fibroblast alignment and biocompatibility. Eplasty. www.eplasty.com Barr S, Hill E, Bayat A (2009) Current implant surface technology: an examination of their nanostructure and their influence on fibroblast alignment and biocompatibility. Eplasty. www.​eplasty.​com
14.
go back to reference Frame JD (2014) Commentary on: breast implants and the risk of breast cancer : a meta-analysis on cohort studies. Aesthet Surg J 2015 35(1):63–65. doi: 10/1093/asj/sju093 Frame JD (2014) Commentary on: breast implants and the risk of breast cancer : a meta-analysis on cohort studies. Aesthet Surg J 2015 35(1):63–65. doi: 10/1093/asj/sju093
15.
go back to reference Reisman NR (2014) Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: what we can do. Aesthet Surg J 34:956–958CrossRefPubMed Reisman NR (2014) Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: what we can do. Aesthet Surg J 34:956–958CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Rupani A, Kamel D, Frame JD (2015) Lymphomas associated with breast implants: a review of the literature. Aesthet Surg J 35:533–544CrossRefPubMed Rupani A, Kamel D, Frame JD (2015) Lymphomas associated with breast implants: a review of the literature. Aesthet Surg J 35:533–544CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Medical and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) (2014) Medical Devices Alert, Department of Health’s Central Alerting System (CAS) Medical and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) (2014) Medical Devices Alert, Department of Health’s Central Alerting System (CAS)
18.
go back to reference Wyatt LE, Sinow JD, Wollman JS, Sami DA, Miller TA (1998) The influence of time on human breast implant capsule histology: smooth and textured silicone surfaced implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(6):1922–1931CrossRefPubMed Wyatt LE, Sinow JD, Wollman JS, Sami DA, Miller TA (1998) The influence of time on human breast implant capsule histology: smooth and textured silicone surfaced implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(6):1922–1931CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hwang K, Sim HB, Huan F (2010) Myofibroblasts and capsular tissue tension in breast capsular contracture. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:716–721CrossRef Hwang K, Sim HB, Huan F (2010) Myofibroblasts and capsular tissue tension in breast capsular contracture. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:716–721CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Castel N, Soon-Sutton T, Deptula P, Flaherty A, Don Parsa F (2015) Polyurethane-coated breast implants revisited: a 30-year follow-up. Arch Plast Surg 42(2):186–193PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Castel N, Soon-Sutton T, Deptula P, Flaherty A, Don Parsa F (2015) Polyurethane-coated breast implants revisited: a 30-year follow-up. Arch Plast Surg 42(2):186–193PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Patel JD, Colton E, Ebert M, Anderson JM (2012) Gene expression during S epidermidis biofilm formation on biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res A 100(11):2863–2869CrossRefPubMed Patel JD, Colton E, Ebert M, Anderson JM (2012) Gene expression during S epidermidis biofilm formation on biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res A 100(11):2863–2869CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The In Vivo Pericapsular Tissue Response to Modern Polyurethane Breast Implants
Authors
James Frame
Dia Kamel
Marcelo Olivan
Henrique Cintra
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0550-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2015 Go to the issue