Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2015

01-10-2015 | Original Article

Implementing Real-Time Video Consultation in Plastic Surgery

Authors: I. Westra, F. B. Niessen

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Dutch government, hospitals, and health insurance companies have agreed on concentrating all specialist care in a few expert centers. This should lead to lower healthcare costs, but might also cause less accessible healthcare for patients living at a considerable distance from expert centers. A way to overcome less accessible healthcare, while maintaining reduced costs of medical care, is by using telemedicine between physician and patient.

Methods

In a randomized controlled trial, follow-up consultation between the patient and physician via a secured real-time video connection 6 weeks after plastic surgery of the face was compared to traditional in-person consultation after the same time interval. After the consultation, patients received an invite to fill in an online survey, which consisted of questionnaires assessing patient satisfaction (PSQ-18, TSQ) and communication experiences (PEQ), as well as questions about the time spent on different aspects of the consultations.

Results

Thirty-one patients participated. Overall satisfaction was equal for both groups, but a significant difference in the dimensions ‘general satisfaction’ (online consultation group more satisfied) and ‘accessibility and convenience’ (online consultation group less satisfied) was found. Patients reported significantly lower satisfaction in patient–physician communication in online consultation than in traditional in-person consultations. Patients were satisfied with the online consultation, and were willing to use the system again. Patients in the online consultation group experienced significantly less waiting time, and spent less time in total for the appointment.

Conclusions

Overall patients are equally satisfied with traditional consultation or real-time video consultation in plastic surgery. Online consultation is found to be a time-saving alternative to traditional consultation. However, online consultation is perceived by some patients as a negative influence on communication with the physician. Dedicated training for physicians in the use of online consultation is recommended to improve their online communicative skills.

Level of Evidence I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dutch Parliamentary records (Kamerstukken II) 2010/11, 29 248, nr. 215 Dutch Parliamentary records (Kamerstukken II) 2010/11, 29 248, nr. 215
2.
go back to reference Charles BL (2000) Telemedicine can lower costs and improve access. HFM 54(4):66PubMed Charles BL (2000) Telemedicine can lower costs and improve access. HFM 54(4):66PubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Liu X, Sawada Y, Takizawa T, Sato H, Sato M, Sakamoto H, Utsugi T, Sato K, Sumino H, Okamura S, Sakamaki T (2007) Doctor–patient communication: a comparison between telemedicine consultation and face-to-face consultation. Intern Med 46:227–232CrossRefPubMed Liu X, Sawada Y, Takizawa T, Sato H, Sato M, Sakamoto H, Utsugi T, Sato K, Sumino H, Okamura S, Sakamaki T (2007) Doctor–patient communication: a comparison between telemedicine consultation and face-to-face consultation. Intern Med 46:227–232CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ministry of Economic Affairs: Final Evaluation Telefysiek (ministerie van Economische Zaken: Eind Evaluatie Telefysiek) (2011) Ministry of Economic Affairs: Final Evaluation Telefysiek (ministerie van Economische Zaken: Eind Evaluatie Telefysiek) (2011)
7.
go back to reference Gustke SS, Balch DC, West VL, Rogers LO (2000) Patient satisfaction with telemedicine. Telemed J 6:5–13CrossRef Gustke SS, Balch DC, West VL, Rogers LO (2000) Patient satisfaction with telemedicine. Telemed J 6:5–13CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Whitten P, Love B (2005) Patient and provider satisfaction with the use of telemedicine: overview and rationale for cautious enthusiasm. J Postgrad Med 51:294–300PubMed Whitten P, Love B (2005) Patient and provider satisfaction with the use of telemedicine: overview and rationale for cautious enthusiasm. J Postgrad Med 51:294–300PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kitamura C, Zurawel-Balaura L, Wong RKS (2010) How effective is video consultation in clinical oncology? A systematic review. Curr Oncol 17(3):17–27PubMedCentralPubMed Kitamura C, Zurawel-Balaura L, Wong RKS (2010) How effective is video consultation in clinical oncology? A systematic review. Curr Oncol 17(3):17–27PubMedCentralPubMed
10.
go back to reference Agha Z, Schapira RM, Laud PW, McNutt G, Roter DL (2009) Patient satisfaction with physician–patient communication during telemedicine. Telemed J E Health 15:830–839CrossRefPubMed Agha Z, Schapira RM, Laud PW, McNutt G, Roter DL (2009) Patient satisfaction with physician–patient communication during telemedicine. Telemed J E Health 15:830–839CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference DiMatteo MR (1994) The physician–patient relationship: effects on the quality of health care. Clin Obstet Gynecol 37:149–161CrossRefPubMed DiMatteo MR (1994) The physician–patient relationship: effects on the quality of health care. Clin Obstet Gynecol 37:149–161CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE (1989) Assessing the effects of physician–patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care 27(3):S110–S127CrossRefPubMed Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE (1989) Assessing the effects of physician–patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care 27(3):S110–S127CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Marshall GN, Hays RD (1994) The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire short-form (PSQ-18). RAND, Santa Monica Marshall GN, Hays RD (1994) The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire short-form (PSQ-18). RAND, Santa Monica
14.
go back to reference Steine S, Finset A, Laerum E (2001) A new, brief questionnaire (PEQ) developed in primary health care for measuring patients’ experience of interaction, emotion and consultation outcome. Fam Pract 18:410–418CrossRefPubMed Steine S, Finset A, Laerum E (2001) A new, brief questionnaire (PEQ) developed in primary health care for measuring patients’ experience of interaction, emotion and consultation outcome. Fam Pract 18:410–418CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Yip M, Chang A, Chan J, Mackenzie A (2003) Development of the telemedicine satisfaction questionnaire to evaluate patient satisfaction with telemedicine: a preliminary study. J Telemed Telecare 9:46–50CrossRefPubMed Yip M, Chang A, Chan J, Mackenzie A (2003) Development of the telemedicine satisfaction questionnaire to evaluate patient satisfaction with telemedicine: a preliminary study. J Telemed Telecare 9:46–50CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tindall LR, Huebner RA, Stemple JC, Kleinert HL (2008) Videophone-delivered voice therapy: a comparative analysis of outcomes to traditional delivery for adults with Parkinson’s disease. Telemed e-Health 14(10):1070–1077CrossRef Tindall LR, Huebner RA, Stemple JC, Kleinert HL (2008) Videophone-delivered voice therapy: a comparative analysis of outcomes to traditional delivery for adults with Parkinson’s disease. Telemed e-Health 14(10):1070–1077CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Julious SA (2005) Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat 4:287–291CrossRef Julious SA (2005) Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat 4:287–291CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Implementing Real-Time Video Consultation in Plastic Surgery
Authors
I. Westra
F. B. Niessen
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0526-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2015 Go to the issue