Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2012

01-08-2012 | Original Article

Finesse in Otoplasty in Four Steps

Authors: Júlio Antônio Stédile Ribeiro, Gisele Silva da Silva

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This report describes the authors’ personal experience with an otoplasty technique used to correct several deformities of the auricular cartilage in prominent ears using a single surgical procedure.

Methods

This technique allows for correction of all alterations in prominent ears by acting on four basic sites of the auricular cartilage using incisions, microincisions, and microresections that shape the curvature of the auricular cartilage. This, combined with elliptical resection of the retroauricular skin, provides prompt reshaping of the ear, conferring a natural appearance. This technique was used for 897 patients ages 5 to 65 years for a period of 16 years (1994–2010). Of these patients, 304 had undergone previous otoplasty. The postoperative follow-up period for these patients was 1 to 14 years.

Results

This technique allowed for correction of prominent ears to achieve a natural appearance. It achieved complete satisfaction for 890 patients and a low rate of complications. Three cases of postoperative infection occurred, which were effectively controlled with antimicrobial treatment, and four cases of immediate postoperative hematoma occurred, which had no consequences because early drainage was used. There were no cases of keloids, hypertrophic scarring, or necrosis.

Conclusions

This versatile and complete technique allows for correction of all deformities that constitute prominent ears. It is associated with a low rate of complications and relapses by preventing strain of the cartilage.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Beasley NJP, Jones NS (1996) Otoplasty: the problem of the deep conchal bowl. J Laryngol Otol 110:864–868PubMed Beasley NJP, Jones NS (1996) Otoplasty: the problem of the deep conchal bowl. J Laryngol Otol 110:864–868PubMed
3.
go back to reference Vuyk HD (1997) Cartilage-sparing otoplasty: a review with long-term the results. J Laringol Otol 3:424–430 Vuyk HD (1997) Cartilage-sparing otoplasty: a review with long-term the results. J Laringol Otol 3:424–430
4.
go back to reference Janis JE, Rohrich RJ, Gutowski KA (2005) Otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 225:60–67CrossRef Janis JE, Rohrich RJ, Gutowski KA (2005) Otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 225:60–67CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Petersson RS, Friedman O (2008) Current trends in otoplasty. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 16:352–358PubMedCrossRef Petersson RS, Friedman O (2008) Current trends in otoplasty. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 16:352–358PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bauer BS, Song DH, Aitken ME (2002) Combined otoplasty technique: chondrocutaneous conchal resection as the cornerstone to correction of the prominent ear. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1033–1040PubMedCrossRef Bauer BS, Song DH, Aitken ME (2002) Combined otoplasty technique: chondrocutaneous conchal resection as the cornerstone to correction of the prominent ear. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1033–1040PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Adamson JE, Horton CE, Crawfod HH (1965) The growth pattern of the external ear. Plast Reconstr Surg 36:466–470PubMedCrossRef Adamson JE, Horton CE, Crawfod HH (1965) The growth pattern of the external ear. Plast Reconstr Surg 36:466–470PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Owsley T, Biggerstaff T (2009) Otoplasty complications. Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin North Am 21:105–118CrossRef Owsley T, Biggerstaff T (2009) Otoplasty complications. Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin North Am 21:105–118CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kelley P, Hollie RL, Stal S (2003) Otoplasty: evaluation, technique, and review. J Surg Craniofac 14:643–653CrossRef Kelley P, Hollie RL, Stal S (2003) Otoplasty: evaluation, technique, and review. J Surg Craniofac 14:643–653CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Miyamoto J et al (2009) Biomechanical evaluation of surgical correction of prominent ear. Plast Reconstr Surg 123(3):889–896PubMedCrossRef Miyamoto J et al (2009) Biomechanical evaluation of surgical correction of prominent ear. Plast Reconstr Surg 123(3):889–896PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stenstrom AH, Crysdale WS (1963) A “natural” technique for correction of congenitally prominent ears. Plast Reconstr Surg 32:509–518CrossRef Stenstrom AH, Crysdale WS (1963) A “natural” technique for correction of congenitally prominent ears. Plast Reconstr Surg 32:509–518CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gibson T, Davis W (1958) The distortion of autologenous cartilage grafts: its cause and prevention. Br J Plast Surg 10:257CrossRef Gibson T, Davis W (1958) The distortion of autologenous cartilage grafts: its cause and prevention. Br J Plast Surg 10:257CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Weinzweig N, Chen L (1994) Walter GS: histo morphology of neochodrogenesis after fold creation: a comparison of three otoplasty techniques in the rabbit. Ann Plast Surg 33:371PubMedCrossRef Weinzweig N, Chen L (1994) Walter GS: histo morphology of neochodrogenesis after fold creation: a comparison of three otoplasty techniques in the rabbit. Ann Plast Surg 33:371PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Finesse in Otoplasty in Four Steps
Authors
Júlio Antônio Stédile Ribeiro
Gisele Silva da Silva
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-9914-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2012 Go to the issue