Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 3/2021

01-03-2021 | Invited Papers

Managing patients’ expectations in orthopaedics

Authors: Andrew Quaile, Andreas Mavrogenis, Marius Scarlat

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Excerpt

The specialism of orthopaedic surgery covers many subdisciplines. Most of these deal with degenerative changes occurring as a result of the normal aging process. Some will follow trauma or are as a result of congenital malformations. Patients, however, are pre-conditioned to look for a ‘cure’ and are not that happy to learn if one is not available. It is more likely that the aging or degenerative process will be ‘managed’ throughout the patient’s life time. A number of papers attempt to deal with this problem and attempt to build statistical models to allow predictions to be made about patient outcomes. They are all aimed at improving patient outcomes [1]. These patients need careful handling as they need to understand that the aging process cannot be cured and resultant symptoms can only be managed. There are many both operative and conservative options, but the aim is to control the symptoms they experience to allow a return to function as close to normal as possible. The message which used to be imparted to orthopaedic trainees in the UK was ‘masterly inactivity or supervised neglect’ depending upon the consultant’s approach. This followed the concept of ‘first do no harm’ rather than leaping in with an invasive procedure. Orthopaedic meetings are full of examples where there is a ‘triumph of technology over common sense’. Explanation to patients is therefore the key to a successful outcome for all parties. It is apparent that patients are more interested in physical recovery than a return to work or for financial objectives. For that reason, orthopaedic surgeons are encouraged to consider assessing the socioeconomic well-being of their patients [2]. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cancienne JM, Beck E, Chahla J, Lee EK, Nho SJ (2019) A predictive model for achieving the minimal clinically important difference following hip arthroscopy: an analysis of 2,511 patients. Orthop J Sports Med 5:7.7 Cancienne JM, Beck E, Chahla J, Lee EK, Nho SJ (2019) A predictive model for achieving the minimal clinically important difference following hip arthroscopy: an analysis of 2,511 patients. Orthop J Sports Med 5:7.7
2.
go back to reference O’Hara NN, Kringos, Dionne S, Slobogean GP, Degani Y, Klazinga NS (2020) Patients place more of an emphasis on physical recovery than return to work or financial recovery. Clin Orthop Relat Res O’Hara NN, Kringos, Dionne S, Slobogean GP, Degani Y, Klazinga NS (2020) Patients place more of an emphasis on physical recovery than return to work or financial recovery. Clin Orthop Relat Res
3.
go back to reference Tagliaferri SD, Miller CT, Owen PJ, Mitchell UH, Brisby H (2020) Domains of chronic low back pain and assessing treatment effectiveness. Pain Pract 20(2):211–225CrossRef Tagliaferri SD, Miller CT, Owen PJ, Mitchell UH, Brisby H (2020) Domains of chronic low back pain and assessing treatment effectiveness. Pain Pract 20(2):211–225CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bronger HM, Bulow J (2011) Who returns to work after orthopaedic surgery? Identification of risk factors influencing the patient’s expectations of RTW. Physiotherapy (United Kingdom) (suppl. 1):97 Bronger HM, Bulow J (2011) Who returns to work after orthopaedic surgery? Identification of risk factors influencing the patient’s expectations of RTW. Physiotherapy (United Kingdom) (suppl. 1):97
5.
go back to reference Lee WA, Lee WE, Law S, Lau WA, Leung S (2013) Managing psychosocial contributors in low back pain patients – a randomised controlled trial. J Orthop Trauma Rehab 17(1):46–51 Lee WA, Lee WE, Law S, Lau WA, Leung S (2013) Managing psychosocial contributors in low back pain patients – a randomised controlled trial. J Orthop Trauma Rehab 17(1):46–51
6.
go back to reference Post AA, Rio EK, Sluka KA, Mosesley GL, Bayman EO (2020) Effect of pain education and function in chronic Achilles tendinopathy: protocol for a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. JMIR Res Protoc:9.11 Post AA, Rio EK, Sluka KA, Mosesley GL, Bayman EO (2020) Effect of pain education and function in chronic Achilles tendinopathy: protocol for a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. JMIR Res Protoc:9.11
7.
go back to reference Thompson K, Kramarchuk M, Yagnatovsky M, Kunichoff D, Zacchilli M (2020) Pain catastrophizing is associated with increased physical disability in patients with anterior knee pain. J Orthop 21:283–286CrossRef Thompson K, Kramarchuk M, Yagnatovsky M, Kunichoff D, Zacchilli M (2020) Pain catastrophizing is associated with increased physical disability in patients with anterior knee pain. J Orthop 21:283–286CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kazmers NH, Hung M, Rane AA, Bounsanga J, Weng C (2017) Association of physical function, anxiety and pain interference in nonshoulder upper extremity patients using the PROMIS platform. J Hand Surg Am 42(10):781–787CrossRef Kazmers NH, Hung M, Rane AA, Bounsanga J, Weng C (2017) Association of physical function, anxiety and pain interference in nonshoulder upper extremity patients using the PROMIS platform. J Hand Surg Am 42(10):781–787CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Waddell G, McCulloch JA, Kummel E, Venner RM (1980) Nonorganic physical signs in low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 5(2):117–125CrossRef Waddell G, McCulloch JA, Kummel E, Venner RM (1980) Nonorganic physical signs in low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 5(2):117–125CrossRef
10.
go back to reference D’Souza RS, Dowling TJ, Law L (2020) Waddel Sign. StatsPearls D’Souza RS, Dowling TJ, Law L (2020) Waddel Sign. StatsPearls
11.
go back to reference Leeuw M, Goossens MEJB, Linton SJ, Crombez G, Boersma K, Vlaeyen JWS (2007) The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: current state of scientific evidence. J Behav Med 30(1) Leeuw M, Goossens MEJB, Linton SJ, Crombez G, Boersma K, Vlaeyen JWS (2007) The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: current state of scientific evidence. J Behav Med 30(1)
12.
go back to reference Wolfensberger A, Vuistiner P, Konzelmann M, Plomb-Holmes C, Leger B (2016) Clinician and patient-reported outcomes are associated with psychological factors in patients with chronic shoulder pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(9):2030–2039CrossRef Wolfensberger A, Vuistiner P, Konzelmann M, Plomb-Holmes C, Leger B (2016) Clinician and patient-reported outcomes are associated with psychological factors in patients with chronic shoulder pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(9):2030–2039CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Managing patients’ expectations in orthopaedics
Authors
Andrew Quaile
Andreas Mavrogenis
Marius Scarlat
Publication date
01-03-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-04952-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

International Orthopaedics 3/2021 Go to the issue