Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 3/2021

01-03-2021 | Hip-TEP | Original Paper

Acetabular screws do not improve early revision rates in primary total hip arthroplasty. An instrumented registry analysis

Authors: Mary Nugent, David G. Campbell, Peter L. Lewis, Alana R. Cuthbert, Lucien B. Solomon

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Initial stability of uncemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is important for osseointegration and potentially enhanced by screw fixation. We used Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry data to determine whether screw usage influences uncemented acetabular component survival.

Methods

Primary THA with uncemented acetabular components performed for osteoarthritis from 1999 to 2018 was included. Survivorship was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative percent revision (CPR). Comparisons used Cox proportional hazards method. An instrumental variable analysis adjusted for surgeon preference for screws as a confounding factor was used.

Results

Three hundred thirty thousand one hundred ninety-two THAs were included (31.8% with screws, 68.2% without). Two hundred twenty thousand six hundred seven were included in the instrumental variable analysis. Revision rate of acetabular components (all causes) was higher with screws during the first six years (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.45 (95% CI 1.34, 1.57), p < 0.001) and lower thereafter (HR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.67, 0.98), p = 0.027). Revision rate of acetabular components for loosening was higher with screws over the entire study period (HR = 1.73 (95% CI 1.51, 1.98), p < 0.001). Overall THA revision rate was higher with screws during the first six years (HR = 1.20 (95% CI 1.15, 1.26), p < 0.001) but lower thereafter (HR = 0.89 (95% CI 0.81, 0.98), p = 0.020). Revision rate for dislocation was higher with screws over the entire period (HR = 1.16 (95% CI 1.06, 1.26), p < 0.001). Instrumental variable analysis revealed higher revision rates with acetabular screws in the first six years. (HR = 1.18 (95% CI 1.09–1.29), p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Screws did not confer a protective effect against acetabular loosening and were not associated with long-term negative consequences.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C (1986) Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 208:108–113 Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C (1986) Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 208:108–113
5.
go back to reference Huk OL, Bansal M, Betts F, Rimnac CM, Lieberman JR, Huo MH, Salvati EA (1994) Polyethylene and metal debris generated by non-articulating surfaces of modular acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(4):568–574CrossRef Huk OL, Bansal M, Betts F, Rimnac CM, Lieberman JR, Huo MH, Salvati EA (1994) Polyethylene and metal debris generated by non-articulating surfaces of modular acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(4):568–574CrossRef
6.
go back to reference AOA (2019) Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, knee & shoulder arthroplasty: 2019 Annual Report. AOA, Adelaide AOA (2019) Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, knee & shoulder arthroplasty: 2019 Annual Report. AOA, Adelaide
9.
go back to reference NJR (2018) National Joint Registry Report For England, Wales and Northern Ireland. vol 15th Annual Report NJR (2018) National Joint Registry Report For England, Wales and Northern Ireland. vol 15th Annual Report
11.
go back to reference Won CH, Hearn TC, Tile M (1995) Micromotion of cementless hemispherical acetabular components. Does press-fit need adjunctive screw fixation? J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(3):484–489CrossRef Won CH, Hearn TC, Tile M (1995) Micromotion of cementless hemispherical acetabular components. Does press-fit need adjunctive screw fixation? J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(3):484–489CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Goodnough LH, Bonano JC, Finlay AK, Aggarwal VK, Huddleston JI 3rd, Maloney WJ, Goodman SB, Amanatullah DF (2020) Selective screw fixation is associated with early failure of primary acetabular components for aseptic loosening. J Orthop Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24649 Goodnough LH, Bonano JC, Finlay AK, Aggarwal VK, Huddleston JI 3rd, Maloney WJ, Goodman SB, Amanatullah DF (2020) Selective screw fixation is associated with early failure of primary acetabular components for aseptic loosening. J Orthop Res. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jor.​24649
27.
go back to reference New Zealand National Joint Registry Report (2017). vol 18th Annual Report New Zealand National Joint Registry Report (2017). vol 18th Annual Report
Metadata
Title
Acetabular screws do not improve early revision rates in primary total hip arthroplasty. An instrumented registry analysis
Authors
Mary Nugent
David G. Campbell
Peter L. Lewis
Alana R. Cuthbert
Lucien B. Solomon
Publication date
01-03-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords
Hip-TEP
Hip-TEP
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-04949-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

International Orthopaedics 3/2021 Go to the issue