Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Orthopaedics
Published in: International Orthopaedics 1/2021

01-01-2021 | Original Paper

Institutional arthroplasty registry: what is the minimum acceptable dataset to be included in your hospital? Recommendations from a single-country national consensus using the Delphi method

Authors: Guillermo A. Bonilla, Beatriz E. Montoya, Victoria E. Restrepo, Miguel M. Gomez, Alfredo A. Sánchez, Jose I. Sánchez, Hugo A. Rodríguez, Jairo A. Rincón, Antonio L. Solano, Diego Cardona, Saúl L. Martínez, Alejandro López, Jose L. Moore, on behalf of the members of the Colombian Society of Hip and Knee Surgeons (SOCCAR)

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Institutional arthroplasty registries are very popular nowadays; however, very few efforts have been made in order to standardize the information to be collected, thus limiting the possibility of inter-institutional data interpretation. This manuscript reports the results of a single-country consensus designed to define the minimum standardized dataset to be recorded within an institutional arthroplasty registry.

Methods

A national consensus was carried out among all members of the Colombian Society of Hip and Knee Surgeons using the Delphi method. Eleven questions and answers comprising every potential domain of an institutional registry of hip and knee arthroplasty were defined. According to the methodology, anonymous voting and multiple discussion rounds were performed. Three levels of agreement were defined: Strong consensus: equal to or greater than 80%, weak consensus between 70 and 79.9%, and no consensus below 70%.

Results

All of the questions reached consensus level. The minimum dataset was defined to include demographic and clinical information, intraoperative and implant details, follow-up and early complications, implant survival, and functional outcome scores, as well as the validation model to assess information quality within the database. Currently, this dataset is being implemented voluntarily by the members of our national society.

Discussion

A national consensus is a feasible method to build homogeneous arthroplasty registries. We recommend such an exercise since it establishes the basis to compare and add data between institutions and the joint analysis of said information in a national registry.
Literature
1.
Brooke EM (1974) The current and future use of registers in health information systems. In: Brooke EM (ed) World Health Organization. World Health Organization, United States (WHO offset publication ; no. 8)
2.
Bautista MP, Bonilla GA, Mieth KW, Llinas AM, Rodriguez F, Cardenas LL (2017) Data quality in Institutional Arthroplasty Registries: description of a model of validation and report of preliminary results. J Arthroplast 32(7):2065–2069CrossRef
3.
Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H (2000) Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 32(4):1008–1015
4.
Okoli C, Pawlowski S (2004) The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inf Manag 42:15–29CrossRef
5.
Profillidis VA, Botzoris GN (2019) Chapter 4 - Executive judgment, delphi, scenario writing, and survey methods. In: Profillidis VA, Botzoris GN (eds) Modeling of transport demand. Elsevier, pp 125–161
6.
7.
The New Zealand Joint Registry. Eignteen year report. January 1999 to December 2016. Hip Arthroplasty
8.
9.
Aggarwal VK, Elbuluk A, Dundon J, Herrero C, Hernandez C, Vigdorchik JM et al (2019) Surgical approach significantly affects the complication rates associated with total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 101 B(6):646–651PubMedCrossRef
10.
Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS (2005) Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(11):2456–2463PubMed
11.
Memtsoudis SG, Cozowicz C, Bekeris J, Bekere D, Liu J, Soffin EM et al (2019) Anaesthetic care of patients undergoing primary hip and knee arthroplasty: consensus recommendations from the International Consensus on Anaesthesia-Related Outcomes after Surgery group (ICAROS) based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 123(3):269–287PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Kuijpers MFL, Hannink G, Vehmeijer SBW, van Steenbergen LN, Schreurs BW (2019) The risk of revision after total hip arthroplasty in young patients depends on surgical approach, femoral head size and bearing type; an analysis of 19,682 operations in the Dutch arthroplasty register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20(1):385PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Porter M, Howard P, Lawrence S, Reed M, Stonadge J, Wilkinson M (2018) National Joint Registry 15th Annual Report. Natl Jt Regist 15th Annu Rep 1821(December 2017):1–270
14.
Chan JJ, Robinson J, Poeran J, Huang H-H, Moucha CS, Chen DD (2019) Antibiotic-loaded bone cement in primary total knee arthroplasty: utilization patterns and impact on complications using a national database. J Arthroplast 34(7S):S188–S194.e1CrossRef
15.
Brockman BS, Maupin JJ, Thompson SF, Hollabaugh KM, Thakral R (2020) Complication rates in total knee arthroplasty performed for osteoarthritis and post-traumatic arthritis: a comparison study. J Arthroplast 35(2):371–374CrossRef
16.
Miller LE, Gondusky JS, Kamath AF, Boettner F, Wright J, Bhattacharyya S (2018) Influence of surgical approach on complication risk in primary total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 89(3):289–294PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report 2019. Factors affecting revision rate. Hip Replacement Class 2019
18.
19.
Markel DC, Allen MW, Zappa NM (2016) Can an arthroplasty registry help decrease transfusions in primary total joint replacement? A quality initiative. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(1):126–131PubMedCrossRef
20.
Healy WL, Della Valle CJ, Iorio R, Berend KR, Cushner FD, Dalury DF et al (2013) Complications of total knee arthroplasty: standardized list and definitions of the knee society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(1):215–220PubMedCrossRef
21.
Healy WL, Iorio R, Clair AJ, Pellegrini VD, Della Valle CJ, Berend KR (2016) Complications of total hip arthroplasty: standardized list, definitions, and stratification developed by the hip society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(2):357–364PubMedCrossRef
22.
Lovelock TM, Broughton NS (2018) Follow-up after arthroplasty of the hip and knee: are we over-servicing or under-caring? Bone Joint J 100-B(1):6–10PubMedCrossRef
23.
Parkes RJ, Palmer J, Wingham J, Williams DH (2019) Is virtual clinic follow-up of hip and knee joint replacement acceptable to patients and clinicians? A sequential mixed methods evaluation. BMJ Open Qual 8(1):e000502PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Grassi A, Golinelli D, Tedesco D, Rolli M, Bordini B, Amabile M et al (2019) Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after elective hip, knee and shoulder arthroplasty: protocol for a prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20(1):374PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Nilsdotter A, Bremander A (2011) Measures of hip function and symptoms: Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Lequesne Index of Severity for Osteoarthritis of the Hip (LISOH), and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63(Suppl 1):S200–S207CrossRef
26.
Hospital for Special Surgery. HOOS, JR Scoring Instructions. 2017
27.
Afzal I, Radha S, Smoljanović T, Stafford GH, Twyman R, Field RE (2019) Validation of revision data for total hip and knee replacements undertaken at a high volume orthopaedic centre against data held on the National Joint Registry. J Orthop Surg Res 14(1):318PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Saczynski JS, McManus DD, Goldberg RJ (2013) Commonly used data-collection approaches in clinical research. Am J Med 126(11):946–950PubMedCrossRef
29.
Serra-Sutton V, Allepuz A, Espallargues M, Labek G, Pons JMV (2009) Arthroplasty registers: a review of international experiences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 25(1):63–72PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Institutional arthroplasty registry: what is the minimum acceptable dataset to be included in your hospital? Recommendations from a single-country national consensus using the Delphi method
Authors
Guillermo A. Bonilla
Beatriz E. Montoya
Victoria E. Restrepo
Miguel M. Gomez
Alfredo A. Sánchez
Jose I. Sánchez
Hugo A. Rodríguez
Jairo A. Rincón
Antonio L. Solano
Diego Cardona
Saúl L. Martínez
Alejandro López
Jose L. Moore
on behalf of the members of the Colombian Society of Hip and Knee Surgeons (SOCCAR)
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04866-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

International Orthopaedics 1/2021 Go to the issue

Original Paper

Extended curettage versus en bloc resection for the treatment of grade 3 giant cell tumour of the knee with pathologic fracture: a retrospective study

Review Article

The outcomes of stand alone polyetheretherketone cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Original Paper

Change in the weight-bearing line ratio of the ankle joint and ankle joint line orientation after knee arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy in patients with genu varum deformity

Original Paper

High platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor survival of elderly patients with hip fracture

Original Paper

Arthroscopic realignment and osteosynthesis of unstable scaphoid nonunion with cancellous bone graft from the ipsilateral radius

Original Paper

Efficacy of surgical helmet systems for protection against COVID-19: a double-blinded randomised control study