Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 11/2020

01-11-2020 | Bone Defect | Original Paper

Management of the bone loss by metaphyseal sleeves in primary and revision knee arthroplasty: clinical experience and outcome after forty three cases

Authors: Usman Nazir Gill, Nasir Ahmed, Syed Shahid Noor, Iftikhar Ahmed Memon, Zulfiqar Ali Memon

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 11/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim of the study

Management of metaphyseal bone loss in complex primary and revision TKA is a challenge for surgeons. Out of various types of bony defects, large metaphyseal bone loss (AORI types IIB and III) requires special augments in the form of cones or sleeves. The aim of this study is to assess the reliability of metaphyseal sleeves, in dealing with massive bone defects to provide stability for immediate weight bearing and also to check short to mid-term survivorship of metaphyseal sleeves in Asian population by assessing various parameters and complications.

Methods

This is a retrospective study that includes 36 patients (43 knees), operated from 2011 to 2019. Patients with AORI type IIB (large metaphyseal bone defect) and AORI type III (metaphyseal defect with compromised collateral ligaments) were included. We included both the primary and revision knee arthroplasties in our study. Our interest in this study was to look for incidence of intra-operative iatrogenic fracture on the one hand, and post-operative complications in the form of peri-prosthetic joint infection and aseptic loosening on the other hand. Knee Society Score (KSS) was used to assess improvement in patient’s clinical outcome. SPSS version 23 was used to process data.

Results

The average age of patients in our study was 59.4 (SD 9.78) years. Male to female ratio was 21:15. The average follow-up was 5.42 (SD 2.24) years with the longest follow up of nine years. Metaphyseal sleeves were used in 12 primary TKA and 31 revision TKA. During surgery, iatrogenic fracture of tibial condyle was encountered in three patients (6.9%), all were managed without any intervention and union was achieved in all cases. There was not a single case with aseptic loosening as per radiological criteria in our study. Peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) was encountered in a single case (2.3%). Pre-op Knee Society Score (KSS) was 36.21 (SD 7.43) where as it improved to 92.00 (SD 5.66), six months after surgery. Also the range of flexion was increased from 76.83o (SD 14.07o) to 122.91o (SD 4.84o).

Conclusion

In our study, metaphyseal sleeves showed excellent short to mid-term survivorship in AORI types IIB and III boneloss in Asian population. These results are comparable to various studies conducted on North American and European population. Metaphyseal sleeve is a reliable tool in the armamentarium of the arthroplasty surgeon. It is user friendly implant and provides immediate stability to allow full weight-bearing mobilization.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M, Bozic KJ (2009) Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop 467:2606–2612CrossRef Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M, Bozic KJ (2009) Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop 467:2606–2612CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Causero A, Di Benedetto P, Beltrame A, Gisonni R, Cainero V, Pagano M (2014) Design evolution in total knee replacement: which is the future? Acta Biomed 85(2):5–19PubMed Causero A, Di Benedetto P, Beltrame A, Gisonni R, Cainero V, Pagano M (2014) Design evolution in total knee replacement: which is the future? Acta Biomed 85(2):5–19PubMed
3.
go back to reference Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Schmier J, Zhao K, Mowat F, Lau E (2009) Primary and revision arthroplasty surgery caseloads in the United States from 1990 to 2004. J Arthroplasty 24:195–203CrossRef Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Schmier J, Zhao K, Mowat F, Lau E (2009) Primary and revision arthroplasty surgery caseloads in the United States from 1990 to 2004. J Arthroplasty 24:195–203CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ponzio DY, Austin MS (2015) Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 8:361–367CrossRef Ponzio DY, Austin MS (2015) Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 8:361–367CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Engh GA, Parks NL (1997) The management of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 46:227–236PubMed Engh GA, Parks NL (1997) The management of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 46:227–236PubMed
6.
go back to reference Alexander GE, Bernasek TL, Crank RL, Haidukewych GJ (2013) Cementless metaphyseal sleeves used for large tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28:604–607CrossRef Alexander GE, Bernasek TL, Crank RL, Haidukewych GJ (2013) Cementless metaphyseal sleeves used for large tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28:604–607CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Daines BK, Dennis DA (2013) Management of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 62:341–348PubMed Daines BK, Dennis DA (2013) Management of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 62:341–348PubMed
8.
go back to reference Lee JK, Choi CH (2011) Management of tibial bone defects with metal augmentation in primary total knee replacement: a minimum five-year review. J Bone Joint Surg 93:1493–1496CrossRef Lee JK, Choi CH (2011) Management of tibial bone defects with metal augmentation in primary total knee replacement: a minimum five-year review. J Bone Joint Surg 93:1493–1496CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chun CH, Kim JW, Kim SH, Kim BG, Chun KC, Kim KM (2014) Clinical and radiological results of femoral head structural allograft for severe bone defects in revision TKA—a minimum 8-year follow-up. Knee 21:420–423CrossRef Chun CH, Kim JW, Kim SH, Kim BG, Chun KC, Kim KM (2014) Clinical and radiological results of femoral head structural allograft for severe bone defects in revision TKA—a minimum 8-year follow-up. Knee 21:420–423CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Potter GD 3rd, Abdel MP, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD (2016) Midterm results of porous tantalum femoral cones in revision Total knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 98:1286–1291CrossRef Potter GD 3rd, Abdel MP, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD (2016) Midterm results of porous tantalum femoral cones in revision Total knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 98:1286–1291CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chalmers BP, Desy NM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Taunton MJ (2016) Survivorship of Metaphyseal sleeves in revision Total knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32(5):1565–1570CrossRef Chalmers BP, Desy NM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Taunton MJ (2016) Survivorship of Metaphyseal sleeves in revision Total knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32(5):1565–1570CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Graichen H, Scior W, Strauch M (2015) Direct, Cementless, Metaphyseal fixation in knee revision Arthroplasty with sleeves-short-term results. J Arthroplasty 30:2256–2259CrossRef Graichen H, Scior W, Strauch M (2015) Direct, Cementless, Metaphyseal fixation in knee revision Arthroplasty with sleeves-short-term results. J Arthroplasty 30:2256–2259CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Martin-Hernandez C, Floria-Arnal LJ, Muniesa-Herrero MP et al (2016) Mid-term results for metaphyseal sleeves in revision knee surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(12):3779–3785CrossRef Martin-Hernandez C, Floria-Arnal LJ, Muniesa-Herrero MP et al (2016) Mid-term results for metaphyseal sleeves in revision knee surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(12):3779–3785CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Agarwal S, Azam A, Morgan-Jones R (2013) Metal metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 95:1640–1644CrossRef Agarwal S, Azam A, Morgan-Jones R (2013) Metal metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 95:1640–1644CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Formica M, Cavagnaro L, Basso M, Zanirato A, Palermo A, Felli L (2017) What is the fate of the neck after a collum femoris preserving prosthesis? A nineteen years single center experience. Int Orthop 41(7):1329–1335CrossRef Formica M, Cavagnaro L, Basso M, Zanirato A, Palermo A, Felli L (2017) What is the fate of the neck after a collum femoris preserving prosthesis? A nineteen years single center experience. Int Orthop 41(7):1329–1335CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Graichen H, Scior W, Strauch M (2015) Direct, cementless, metaphyseal fixation in knee revision arthroplasty with sleeves-short term results. J Arthroplasty 30(12):2256–2259CrossRef Graichen H, Scior W, Strauch M (2015) Direct, cementless, metaphyseal fixation in knee revision arthroplasty with sleeves-short term results. J Arthroplasty 30(12):2256–2259CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fedorka CJ, Chen AF, Pagnotto MR, Crossett LS, Klatt BA (2017) Revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves provides radiographic ingrowth and stable fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(5):1500–1505CrossRef Fedorka CJ, Chen AF, Pagnotto MR, Crossett LS, Klatt BA (2017) Revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves provides radiographic ingrowth and stable fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(5):1500–1505CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fehring TK, Odum S, Olekson C et al (2003) Stem fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparative analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:217–224CrossRef Fehring TK, Odum S, Olekson C et al (2003) Stem fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparative analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:217–224CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bugler KE, Maheshwari R, Ahmed I, Brenkel IJ, Walmsley PJ (2015) Metaphyseal sleeves for revision total knee arthroplasty: good short-term outcomes. Arthroplasty 30(11):1990–1994CrossRef Bugler KE, Maheshwari R, Ahmed I, Brenkel IJ, Walmsley PJ (2015) Metaphyseal sleeves for revision total knee arthroplasty: good short-term outcomes. Arthroplasty 30(11):1990–1994CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gøttsche D, Lind T, Christiansen T, Schrøder HM (2016) Cementless metaphyseal sleeves without stem in revision total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(12):1761–1766CrossRef Gøttsche D, Lind T, Christiansen T, Schrøder HM (2016) Cementless metaphyseal sleeves without stem in revision total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(12):1761–1766CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Management of the bone loss by metaphyseal sleeves in primary and revision knee arthroplasty: clinical experience and outcome after forty three cases
Authors
Usman Nazir Gill
Nasir Ahmed
Syed Shahid Noor
Iftikhar Ahmed Memon
Zulfiqar Ali Memon
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04663-1

Other articles of this Issue 11/2020

International Orthopaedics 11/2020 Go to the issue