Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 10/2018

01-10-2018 | Original Paper

Predicting hospital length of stay and short-term function after hip or knee arthroplasty: are both performance and comorbidity measures useful?

Authors: Stéphane Poitras, Kendrick Au, Kristi Wood, Geoffrey Dervin, Paul E. Beaulé

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 10/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Variations in hospital length of stay (LOS) and function are present after hip or knee arthroplasty. Comorbidity and performance measures have been associated with post-operative outcomes. It is however not known if both independently contribute to outcome prediction. The objective of this study was to evaluate the combined predictive ability of comorbidity scores (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification system (ASA), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), 2008 version of the CCI (CCI08)) and a performance measure (Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG)) on LOS and short-term function in patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty.

Methods

One hundred eight patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty were assessed preoperatively with the ASA, CCI, CCI08, and TUG. LOS was determined through administrative data. The Older Americans Resources and Services ADL questionnaire (OARS) was used to assess function two and six weeks after surgery. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between pre-operative assessments and LOS and OARS scores.

Results

Both the ASA and TUG significantly contributed to LOS prediction. Odds ratio (OR) was 3.57 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26–10.07) for the ASA, and 2.18 (95% CI 1.67–4.15) for a one-standard deviation (SD) increase of 4.45 s of the TUG. Only the TUG was predictive of two weeks function and trending towards significance for six weeks function. One SD TUG increase yielded an OR of 2.14 (95% CI 1.53–3.79) for two week function.

Conclusions

The TUG and ASA can be used pre-operatively in combination to predict LOS, and TUG can also be used to predict short-term post-operative function.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bitar YFE, Illingworth KD, Scaife SL et al (2015) Hospital length of stay following primary total knee arthroplasty: data from the nationwide inpatient sample database. J Arthroplast 30:1710–1715CrossRef Bitar YFE, Illingworth KD, Scaife SL et al (2015) Hospital length of stay following primary total knee arthroplasty: data from the nationwide inpatient sample database. J Arthroplast 30:1710–1715CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Petis SM, Howard JL, Lanting BA et al (2016) Peri-operative predictors of length of stay following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast (January 22) Petis SM, Howard JL, Lanting BA et al (2016) Peri-operative predictors of length of stay following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast (January 22)
9.
go back to reference Toner A, Wallace G, Rowe J et al (2014) The relationship between pre-operative “timed get up and go”and length of stay in primary elective hip and knee arthroplasty patients. Osteoarthr Cartil 22:S380–S381CrossRef Toner A, Wallace G, Rowe J et al (2014) The relationship between pre-operative “timed get up and go”and length of stay in primary elective hip and knee arthroplasty patients. Osteoarthr Cartil 22:S380–S381CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Podsiadlo D, Richardson S (1991) The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39:142–148CrossRef Podsiadlo D, Richardson S (1991) The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39:142–148CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Steiner C, Andrews R, Barrett M, Weiss A (2012) HCUP projections: mobility/orthopedic procedures 2003 to 2012. US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Steiner C, Andrews R, Barrett M, Weiss A (2012) HCUP projections: mobility/orthopedic procedures 2003 to 2012. US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
13.
go back to reference Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E et al (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 49:1373–1379CrossRef Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E et al (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 49:1373–1379CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fillenbaum GG, Smyer MA (1981) The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire. J Gerontol 36:428–434CrossRef Fillenbaum GG, Smyer MA (1981) The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire. J Gerontol 36:428–434CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Haywood KL, Garratt AM, Fitzpatrick R (2005) Older people specific health status and quality of life: a structured review of self-assessed instruments. J Eval Clin Pract 11:315–327CrossRef Haywood KL, Garratt AM, Fitzpatrick R (2005) Older people specific health status and quality of life: a structured review of self-assessed instruments. J Eval Clin Pract 11:315–327CrossRef
17.
go back to reference George LK, Ruiz Jr D, Sloan FA (2008) The effects of total knee arthroplasty on physical functioning in the older population. Arthritis Rheum 58:3166–3171. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23888; 10.1002/art.23888CrossRef George LK, Ruiz Jr D, Sloan FA (2008) The effects of total knee arthroplasty on physical functioning in the older population. Arthritis Rheum 58:3166–3171. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​art.​23888; 10.1002/art.23888CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRef
22.
go back to reference American Society of Anaesthesiologists (2014) ASA physical status classification system American Society of Anaesthesiologists (2014) ASA physical status classification system
23.
go back to reference Harrison JD, Greysen RS, Jacolbia R, et al (2016) Not ready, not set… discharge: patient-reported barriers to discharge readiness at an academic medical center. J Hosp Med April 15: Harrison JD, Greysen RS, Jacolbia R, et al (2016) Not ready, not set… discharge: patient-reported barriers to discharge readiness at an academic medical center. J Hosp Med April 15:
26.
go back to reference Barsoum WK, Murray TG, Klika AK, et al (2010) Predicting patient discharge disposition after total joint arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplast 25:885–892. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.06.022CrossRef Barsoum WK, Murray TG, Klika AK, et al (2010) Predicting patient discharge disposition after total joint arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplast 25:885–892. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.06.022CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lubbeke A, Katz JN, Perneger TV, Hoffmeyer P (2007) Primary and revision hip arthroplasty: 5-year outcomes and influence of age and comorbidity. J Rheumatol 34:394–400PubMed Lubbeke A, Katz JN, Perneger TV, Hoffmeyer P (2007) Primary and revision hip arthroplasty: 5-year outcomes and influence of age and comorbidity. J Rheumatol 34:394–400PubMed
30.
go back to reference Jr JAZ, Snyder-Mackler L (2010) Early postoperative measures predict 1- and 2-year outcomes after unilateral total knee arthroplasty: importance of contralateral limb strength. Phys Ther 90:43–54CrossRef Jr JAZ, Snyder-Mackler L (2010) Early postoperative measures predict 1- and 2-year outcomes after unilateral total knee arthroplasty: importance of contralateral limb strength. Phys Ther 90:43–54CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predicting hospital length of stay and short-term function after hip or knee arthroplasty: are both performance and comorbidity measures useful?
Authors
Stéphane Poitras
Kendrick Au
Kristi Wood
Geoffrey Dervin
Paul E. Beaulé
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3833-y

Other articles of this Issue 10/2018

International Orthopaedics 10/2018 Go to the issue