Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 3/2018

Open Access 01-03-2018 | Original Paper

Is there any difference between open and arthroscopic treatment for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the humeral capitellum: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Yi Lu, Yi Jun Li, Si Yi Guo, Hai Long Zhang

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We present a systematic review of the recent literatures regarding the arthroscopic and open technique in fragment fixation for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the humeral capitellum and an analysis of the subjective and objective outcomes between these two procedures.

Methods

PubMed and EMBASE were reviewed for suitable articles relating to fragment fixation for OCD, both open and arthroscopic. We included all studies reporting on the clinical outcomes of these two procedures that were published in the English language. Data extracted from each study included level of evidence, number of patients, surgical techniques, length of follow-up, clinical outcome measures including outcome scores, range of motion (ROM), return to sports, osseous union and complications. We analyzed each study to determine the primary outcome measurement.

Results

A total of ten studies met our inclusion criteria. Among all studies, 35 arthroscopic procedures and 107 open procedures were performed. After the procedure, 70 patients (86.4%) in the open group returned to their sports, and 32 patients (91.4%) in the arthroscopic group returned to their sports. In the arthroscopic group, patients gained 14.1 degrees of flexion and 9.5 degrees of extension after surgery. In the open group, patients gained 8 degrees of flexion and 5.7 degrees of extension. Five patients (4.7%) had complications in the open group. No complication was found in the arthroscopic group.

Conclusions

Both open and arthroscopic lesion debridement with fragment fixation are successful in treating unstable OCD. The arthroscopic technique may be a better choice than the open procedure, but we need high-level evidence to determine the superiority of the open or arthroscopic techniques in treating elbow OCD.

Level of evidence

Level III.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Schenck RC Jr, Goodnight JM (1996) Osteochondritis dissecans. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:439–456 Schenck RC Jr, Goodnight JM (1996) Osteochondritis dissecans. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:439–456
3.
go back to reference Stubbs MJ, Field LD (2001) Osteochondritis dissecans of the elbow. Clin Sports Med 20:1–9 Stubbs MJ, Field LD (2001) Osteochondritis dissecans of the elbow. Clin Sports Med 20:1–9
11.
go back to reference Takahara M, Mura N, Sasaki J, Harada M, Ogino T (2007) Classification, treatment, and outcome of osteochondritis dissecans of the humeral capitellum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1205–1214CrossRefPubMed Takahara M, Mura N, Sasaki J, Harada M, Ogino T (2007) Classification, treatment, and outcome of osteochondritis dissecans of the humeral capitellum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1205–1214CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kuwahata Y, Inoue G (1998) Osteochondritis dissecans of the elbow managed by Herbert screw fixation. Orthopedics 21:449–451PubMed Kuwahata Y, Inoue G (1998) Osteochondritis dissecans of the elbow managed by Herbert screw fixation. Orthopedics 21:449–451PubMed
15.
go back to reference Chambers HG, Shea KG, Carey JL (2011) AAOS clinical practice guideline: diagnosis and treatment of osteochondritis dissecans. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19:307–309CrossRefPubMed Chambers HG, Shea KG, Carey JL (2011) AAOS clinical practice guideline: diagnosis and treatment of osteochondritis dissecans. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19:307–309CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ruch DS, Cory JW, Poehling GG (1998) The arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans of the adolescent elbow. Arthroscopy 14:797–803CrossRefPubMed Ruch DS, Cory JW, Poehling GG (1998) The arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans of the adolescent elbow. Arthroscopy 14:797–803CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews for interventions, version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, London Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews for interventions, version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, London
21.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Open Med 3:e123–e130PubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Open Med 3:e123–e130PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N, Cook JL, Wark JD (2000) Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10:2–11 Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N, Cook JL, Wark JD (2000) Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10:2–11
23.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed
24.
28.
go back to reference Nagura S (1960) The so-called osteochondritis dissecans of Konig. Clin Orthop 18:100–122 Nagura S (1960) The so-called osteochondritis dissecans of Konig. Clin Orthop 18:100–122
34.
go back to reference Leong NL, Cohen JR, Lord E, Wang JC, McAllister DR, Petrigliano FA (2015) Demographic trends and complication rates in arthroscopic elbow surgery. Arthroscopy 31:1928–1932CrossRefPubMed Leong NL, Cohen JR, Lord E, Wang JC, McAllister DR, Petrigliano FA (2015) Demographic trends and complication rates in arthroscopic elbow surgery. Arthroscopy 31:1928–1932CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Elfeddali R, Schreuder MHE, Eygendaal D (2013) Arthroscopic elbow surgery, is it safe? J Shoulder Elb Surg 22:647–652CrossRef Elfeddali R, Schreuder MHE, Eygendaal D (2013) Arthroscopic elbow surgery, is it safe? J Shoulder Elb Surg 22:647–652CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Kelly EW, Morrey BF, O’Driscoll SW (2001) Complications of elbow arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:25–34CrossRefPubMed Kelly EW, Morrey BF, O’Driscoll SW (2001) Complications of elbow arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:25–34CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Nelson GN, Wu T, Galatz LM, Yamaguchi K, Keener JD (2014) Elbow arthroscopy: early complications and associated risk factors. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:273–278CrossRef Nelson GN, Wu T, Galatz LM, Yamaguchi K, Keener JD (2014) Elbow arthroscopy: early complications and associated risk factors. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:273–278CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Is there any difference between open and arthroscopic treatment for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the humeral capitellum: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Yi Lu
Yi Jun Li
Si Yi Guo
Hai Long Zhang
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3768-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

International Orthopaedics 3/2018 Go to the issue