Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 4/2018

Open Access 01-04-2018 | Original Paper

Gait analysis of patients with an off-the-shelf total knee replacement versus customized bi-compartmental knee replacement

Authors: Henry Wang, Jonathan Foster, Natasha Franksen, Jill Estes, Lindsey Rolston

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Newer TKR designs have been introduced to the market with the aim of overcoming common sizing problems with older TKR designs. Furthermore, since a sizable percentage of patients with OA present with disease limited to the medial/lateral knee compartment in addition to the patellofemoral joint, for whom, a customized bi-compartmental knee replacement (BKR) is available as a treatment option. To date, there is very little information regarding knee strength and mechanics during gait for patients implanted with these modern TKR and BKR designs.
The purpose of the study was to evaluate knee strength and mechanics during walking for patients with either a modern off the shelf TKR or a customized BKR and compare these findings to a cohort of healthy controls.

Methods

Twelve healthy controls, eight BKR, and nine TKR patients participated in the study. Maximal isometric knee strength was evaluated. 3D kinematic and kinetic analyses were conducted for level walking.

Results

The TKR knee exhibited less peak extensor torque when compared to, both the BKR and control limbs (p < 0.05). The TKR knee had less extensor moment at stance than both the BKR and control knees (p < 0.05). Both the BKR and control knees displayed larger internal rotation at stance than that of the TKR knee (p < 0.05).

Discussion and conclusion

This study suggests that, for patients that exhibit isolated OA of the tibiofemoral joint, using a customized BKR implant is a viable treatment option and may contribute to superior mechanical advantages.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Huang CH, Cheng CK, Lee YT, Lee KS (1996) Muscle strength after successful total knee replacement, a 6- to 13-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 328:147–154CrossRef Huang CH, Cheng CK, Lee YT, Lee KS (1996) Muscle strength after successful total knee replacement, a 6- to 13-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 328:147–154CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mahoney OM, Kinsey T (2010) Overhand of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: risk factors and clinical consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92-5:1115–1121CrossRef Mahoney OM, Kinsey T (2010) Overhand of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: risk factors and clinical consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92-5:1115–1121CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Petersen W, Rembitzki I, Bruggemann G, Ellermann A, Best R, Gosele-Koppenburg A et al (2014) Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: a narrative review. Int Orthop 38:319–328CrossRefPubMed Petersen W, Rembitzki I, Bruggemann G, Ellermann A, Best R, Gosele-Koppenburg A et al (2014) Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: a narrative review. Int Orthop 38:319–328CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bonnin M, Schmidt A, Basiglini L, Bossard N, Dantony E (2013) Mediolateral oversizing influences pain, function, and flexion after TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2314–2324CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bonnin M, Schmidt A, Basiglini L, Bossard N, Dantony E (2013) Mediolateral oversizing influences pain, function, and flexion after TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2314–2324CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Dai Y, Scuderi G, Penninger C, Bischoff J, Rosenberg A (2014) Increased shape and size offerings of femoral components improve fit during total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2931–2940CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dai Y, Scuderi G, Penninger C, Bischoff J, Rosenberg A (2014) Increased shape and size offerings of femoral components improve fit during total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2931–2940CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Windsor R, Insall J (1994) Surgery of the knee. In: Sledge C, Ruddy S, Harris E, Kelly W (eds) Arthritis surgery. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 794–817 Windsor R, Insall J (1994) Surgery of the knee. In: Sledge C, Ruddy S, Harris E, Kelly W (eds) Arthritis surgery. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 794–817
7.
go back to reference McAlindon TE, Cooper C, Kirwan J, Dieppe P (1992) Knee pain and disability in the community. Br J Rheumatol 31-3:189–192CrossRef McAlindon TE, Cooper C, Kirwan J, Dieppe P (1992) Knee pain and disability in the community. Br J Rheumatol 31-3:189–192CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Heekin R, Fokin A (2014) Incidence of bicompartmental osteoarthritis in patients undergoing total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is the time ripe for a less radical treatment? J Knee Surg 27-1:77–81 Heekin R, Fokin A (2014) Incidence of bicompartmental osteoarthritis in patients undergoing total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is the time ripe for a less radical treatment? J Knee Surg 27-1:77–81
9.
go back to reference Wang H, Dugan E, Frame J, Rolston L (2009) Gait analysis after bi-compartmental knee replacement. Clin Biomech 24:751–754CrossRef Wang H, Dugan E, Frame J, Rolston L (2009) Gait analysis after bi-compartmental knee replacement. Clin Biomech 24:751–754CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rolston L, Siewert K (2009) Assessment of knee alignment after bicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 24-7:1111–1114CrossRef Rolston L, Siewert K (2009) Assessment of knee alignment after bicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 24-7:1111–1114CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Irrgang JJ, Snyder-Mackler L, Wainner RS, Fu FH, Harner CD (1998) Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1132–1145CrossRefPubMed Irrgang JJ, Snyder-Mackler L, Wainner RS, Fu FH, Harner CD (1998) Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1132–1145CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Oatis C (2004) Kinesiology: the mechanics & pathomechanics of human movement, 1st edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia Oatis C (2004) Kinesiology: the mechanics & pathomechanics of human movement, 1st edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
13.
go back to reference Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mahfouz M (2003) In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 410:69–81CrossRef Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mahfouz M (2003) In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 410:69–81CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zeller I, Sharma A, Kurtz W, Anderle M, Komistek RD (2017) Customized versus patient-sized cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo kinematics study using mobile fluoroscopy. J Arthroplast 32-4:1344–1350CrossRef Zeller I, Sharma A, Kurtz W, Anderle M, Komistek RD (2017) Customized versus patient-sized cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo kinematics study using mobile fluoroscopy. J Arthroplast 32-4:1344–1350CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wang H, Simpson KJ, Chamnongkich S, Kinsey T, Mahoney OM (2005) A biomechanical comparison between the single-axis and multi-axis total knee arthroplasty systems for the stand-to-sit movement. Clin Biomech 20:428–433CrossRef Wang H, Simpson KJ, Chamnongkich S, Kinsey T, Mahoney OM (2005) A biomechanical comparison between the single-axis and multi-axis total knee arthroplasty systems for the stand-to-sit movement. Clin Biomech 20:428–433CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wang H, Simpson KJ, Ferrara MS, Chamnongkich S, Kinsey T, Mahoney OM (2006) Biomechanical differences exhibited during sit-to-stand between total knee arthroplasty designs of varying radii. J Arthroplast 21-8:1193–1199CrossRef Wang H, Simpson KJ, Ferrara MS, Chamnongkich S, Kinsey T, Mahoney OM (2006) Biomechanical differences exhibited during sit-to-stand between total knee arthroplasty designs of varying radii. J Arthroplast 21-8:1193–1199CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wang H, Simpson KJ, Chamnongkich S, Kinsey T, Mahoney OM (2008) Biomechanical influence of TKA sesigns with varying radii on bilateral TKA patients during sit-to-stand. Dyn Med 7:12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang H, Simpson KJ, Chamnongkich S, Kinsey T, Mahoney OM (2008) Biomechanical influence of TKA sesigns with varying radii on bilateral TKA patients during sit-to-stand. Dyn Med 7:12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Wang H, Frame J, Rolston L (2012) Influence of bicompartmental knee replacement on stand-to-sit movement. Res Q Exerc Sport 83-2:136–142CrossRef Wang H, Frame J, Rolston L (2012) Influence of bicompartmental knee replacement on stand-to-sit movement. Res Q Exerc Sport 83-2:136–142CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Confalonieri N, Manzotti A (2006) Tissue-sparing surgery with the bi-unicompartmental knee prosthesis: retrospective study with minimum follow-up of 36 months. J Orthop Traumatol 7:108–112CrossRefPubMedCentral Confalonieri N, Manzotti A (2006) Tissue-sparing surgery with the bi-unicompartmental knee prosthesis: retrospective study with minimum follow-up of 36 months. J Orthop Traumatol 7:108–112CrossRefPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Bade MJ, Kohrt WM, Stevens-Lapsley JE (2010) Outcomes before and after total knee arthroplasty compared to healthy adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 40:559–567CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bade MJ, Kohrt WM, Stevens-Lapsley JE (2010) Outcomes before and after total knee arthroplasty compared to healthy adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 40:559–567CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Bolanos AA, Colizza W, McCann PD, Gotlin RS, Wootten ME, Kahn BA, Insall JN (1998) A comparison of isokinetic strength testing and gait analysis in patients with posterior cruciate-retaining and substituting knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplast 13:906–915CrossRef Bolanos AA, Colizza W, McCann PD, Gotlin RS, Wootten ME, Kahn BA, Insall JN (1998) A comparison of isokinetic strength testing and gait analysis in patients with posterior cruciate-retaining and substituting knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplast 13:906–915CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kleijn L, van Hemert W, Meijers W, Kester A, Lisowski L, Grimm B, Heyligers I (2007) Functional improvement after unicompartmental knee replacement: a follow-up study with a performance based knee test. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1187–1193CrossRefPubMed Kleijn L, van Hemert W, Meijers W, Kester A, Lisowski L, Grimm B, Heyligers I (2007) Functional improvement after unicompartmental knee replacement: a follow-up study with a performance based knee test. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1187–1193CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2005) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005-2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89-A4:780–785 Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2005) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005-2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89-A4:780–785
Metadata
Title
Gait analysis of patients with an off-the-shelf total knee replacement versus customized bi-compartmental knee replacement
Authors
Henry Wang
Jonathan Foster
Natasha Franksen
Jill Estes
Lindsey Rolston
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3622-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

International Orthopaedics 4/2018 Go to the issue