Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 11/2017

01-11-2017 | Original Article

Stability of two versus three peripheral pegs of the glenoid component in modern total shoulder arthroplasty

Authors: Eugene F. Stautberg III, Daniel C. Jupiter, Arsalan Amin, Ali A. Qadeer, Omer A. Ilahi

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 11/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), the optimum number of peripheral pegs required for stability in the glenoid component is unknown. This study compared the stability of two versus three peripheral pegs in cemented glenoid components possessing a central press-fit peg.

Methods

Six unmodified glenoid components with three peripheral pegs, a large, central press-fit peg and six modified glenoid components with one inferior peripheral peg sharply removed were cemented into bone substitute polyurethane blocks. A modified rocking-horse test was completed by comparing superior- and inferior-edge displacement before and after 100,000 vertical motion cycles. Then, a torsional failure test applied 2 N axial load, followed by a rotational force to the glenoid component at 0.5 °/s until failure.

Results

Modified rocking-horse testing showed no statistically significant edge displacement at the superior or inferior aspect of the glenoid component before or after testing. During torsional testing, peak torque and degrees of rotation at failure also showed no significant difference.

Conclusion

Two peripheral pegs offer equivalent stability as three peripheral pegs, as assessed by cyclic rocking and rotational failure testing. Fewer peripheral pegs during glenoid component implantation may lead to less dissection, less strain on soft tissues and decreased operative time.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Carter MJ, Mikuls TR, Nayak S, Fehringer EV, Michaud K (2012) Impact of total shoulder arthroplasty on generic and shoulder-specific health-related quality-of-life measures: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(17):e127. doi:10.2106/JBJS.K.00204 CrossRefPubMed Carter MJ, Mikuls TR, Nayak S, Fehringer EV, Michaud K (2012) Impact of total shoulder arthroplasty on generic and shoulder-specific health-related quality-of-life measures: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(17):e127. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​K.​00204 CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Denard PJ, Raiss P, Sowa B, Walch G (2013) Mid- to long-term follow-up of total shoulder arthroplasty using a keeled glenoid in young adults with primary glenohumeral arthritis. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22(7):894–900. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2012.09.016 CrossRef Denard PJ, Raiss P, Sowa B, Walch G (2013) Mid- to long-term follow-up of total shoulder arthroplasty using a keeled glenoid in young adults with primary glenohumeral arthritis. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22(7):894–900. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jse.​2012.​09.​016 CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Torchia ME, Cofield RH, Settergren CR (1997) Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis: long-term results. J Shoulder Elb Surg 6(6):495–505CrossRef Torchia ME, Cofield RH, Settergren CR (1997) Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis: long-term results. J Shoulder Elb Surg 6(6):495–505CrossRef
6.
go back to reference ASTM F1839-08 (2012)e1 (2012) Standard specification for rigid polyurethane foam for use as a standard material for testing Orthopaedic devices and instruments. ASTM International, West Conshohocken http://www.astm.org ASTM F1839-08 (2012)e1 (2012) Standard specification for rigid polyurethane foam for use as a standard material for testing Orthopaedic devices and instruments. ASTM International, West Conshohocken http://​www.​astm.​org
7.
go back to reference ASTM F2028-14 (2014) Standard test methods for dynamic evaluation of Glenoid loosening or disassociation. ASTM International, West Conshohocken http://www.astm.org ASTM F2028-14 (2014) Standard test methods for dynamic evaluation of Glenoid loosening or disassociation. ASTM International, West Conshohocken http://​www.​astm.​org
14.
go back to reference Boileau P, Avidor C, Krishnan SG, Walch G, Kempf JF, Mole D (2002) Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 11(4):351–359. doi:10.1067/mse.2002.125807 CrossRef Boileau P, Avidor C, Krishnan SG, Walch G, Kempf JF, Mole D (2002) Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 11(4):351–359. doi:10.​1067/​mse.​2002.​125807 CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Vavken P, Sadoghi P, von Keudell A, Rosso C, Valderrabano V, Muller AM (2013) Rates of radiolucency and loosening after total shoulder arthroplasty with pegged or keeled glenoid components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(3):215–221. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.00286 CrossRefPubMed Vavken P, Sadoghi P, von Keudell A, Rosso C, Valderrabano V, Muller AM (2013) Rates of radiolucency and loosening after total shoulder arthroplasty with pegged or keeled glenoid components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(3):215–221. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​L.​00286 CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Wirth MA, Korvick DL, Basamania CJ, Toro F, Aufdemorte TB, Rockwood CA Jr (2001) Radiologic, mechanical, and histologic evaluation of 2 glenoid prosthesis designs in a canine model. J Shoulder Elb Surg 10(2):140–148. doi:10.1067/mse.2001.112021 CrossRef Wirth MA, Korvick DL, Basamania CJ, Toro F, Aufdemorte TB, Rockwood CA Jr (2001) Radiologic, mechanical, and histologic evaluation of 2 glenoid prosthesis designs in a canine model. J Shoulder Elb Surg 10(2):140–148. doi:10.​1067/​mse.​2001.​112021 CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Stability of two versus three peripheral pegs of the glenoid component in modern total shoulder arthroplasty
Authors
Eugene F. Stautberg III
Daniel C. Jupiter
Arsalan Amin
Ali A. Qadeer
Omer A. Ilahi
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 11/2017
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3599-7

Other articles of this Issue 11/2017

International Orthopaedics 11/2017 Go to the issue