Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 11/2017

01-11-2017 | Letter to the Editor

In regards to the article by Gamba et al.: “Which immobilization is better for distal radius fracture? A prospective randomized trial”

Authors: Hang Li, Lei Yang

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 11/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

Dear Editor, …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gamba C, Fernandez FAM, Llavall MC, Diez XL, Perez FS (2017) Which immobilization is better for distal radius fracture? A prospective randomized trial. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-017-3518-y Gamba C, Fernandez FAM, Llavall MC, Diez XL, Perez FS (2017) Which immobilization is better for distal radius fracture? A prospective randomized trial. Int Orthop. doi:10.​1007/​s00264-017-3518-y
3.
go back to reference Bong MR, Egol KA, Leibman M, Koval KJ (2006) A comparison of immediate postreduction splinting constructs for controlling initial displacement of fractures of the distal radius: a prospective randomized study of long-arm versus short-arm splinting. J Hand Surg Am 31:766–770. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.01.016 CrossRefPubMed Bong MR, Egol KA, Leibman M, Koval KJ (2006) A comparison of immediate postreduction splinting constructs for controlling initial displacement of fractures of the distal radius: a prospective randomized study of long-arm versus short-arm splinting. J Hand Surg Am 31:766–770. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jhsa.​2006.​01.​016 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
In regards to the article by Gamba et al.: “Which immobilization is better for distal radius fracture? A prospective randomized trial”
Authors
Hang Li
Lei Yang
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 11/2017
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3575-2

Other articles of this Issue 11/2017

International Orthopaedics 11/2017 Go to the issue