Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 5/2017

01-05-2017 | Original Paper

Description and reproducibility assessment of a new computerised tomography scan index to measure the glenoid orientation in relation to the anterior glenoid surface

Authors: Constantina Moraiti, Shahnaz Klouche, Jean David Werthel, Thomas Bauer, Philippe Hardy

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To propose and to assess the reproducibility of a new method (GO [glenoid orientation] index) for the estimation of the glenoid orientation in relation to the anterior surface of the glenoid.

Methods

This is a retrospective study on computed tomography (CT) scan. The GO index was defined as the angle formed by a line perpendicular to the tangent to the anterior surface of the scapula and the glenoid line (which is defined as the line connecting the anterior and the posterior rim of the glenoid). The measurements were performed at the level of the glenoid where its diameter is the greatest. Two independent observers performed each measurement twice. The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was evaluated by the Pearson coefficient (r) and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ρ, ICC). The correlation between GO index and glenoid version as described by Friedman was also studied.

Results

Seventy-eight CT scans were analysed, 38 shoulders with glenohumeral arthritis and 40 healthy shoulders, 32 females/46 males, mean age 53.9 ± 22.7 years. The measures were all highly correlated (r > 0.50, p = 0.00001). The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was good to excellent (0.71 < ρ < 0.84, p = 0.00001). GO index was 26.9 ± 6.3°, 28.4 ± 6° in the group with glenohumeral osteoarthritis and 25.5 ± 6.4° in the healthy group, p = 0.04. The glenoid version was −0.8 ± 7.9° in the group with glenohumeral osteoarthritis and −3.9 ± 6° in the healthy group, p = 0.05. No agreement was found between the glenoid version and GO index.

Conclusions

GO index is simple and reproducible. It could be very useful for the pre-operative planning and intra-operative positioning of the implants in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Nyffeler RW, Sheikh R, Atkinson TS, Jacob HA, Favre P, Gerber C (2006) Effects of glenoid component version on humeral head displacement and joint reaction forces: an experimental study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 15:625–629. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.016 CrossRef Nyffeler RW, Sheikh R, Atkinson TS, Jacob HA, Favre P, Gerber C (2006) Effects of glenoid component version on humeral head displacement and joint reaction forces: an experimental study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 15:625–629. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jse.​2005.​09.​016 CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Friedman RJ, Hawthorne KB, Genez BM (1992) The use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:1032–1037CrossRefPubMed Friedman RJ, Hawthorne KB, Genez BM (1992) The use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:1032–1037CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Andrin J, Macaron C, Pottecher P, Martz P, Baulot E, Trouilloud P, Viard B (2015) Determination of a new computed tomography method for measuring the glenoid version and comparing with a reference method. Radio-anatomical and retrospective study. Int Orthop 40:525–529. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2867-7 CrossRefPubMed Andrin J, Macaron C, Pottecher P, Martz P, Baulot E, Trouilloud P, Viard B (2015) Determination of a new computed tomography method for measuring the glenoid version and comparing with a reference method. Radio-anatomical and retrospective study. Int Orthop 40:525–529. doi:10.​1007/​s00264-015-2867-7 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference van de Bunt F, Pearl ML, Lee EK, Peng L, Didomenico P (2015) Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability. Skelet Radiol 44:1627–1635. doi:10.1007/s00256-015-2207-4 CrossRef van de Bunt F, Pearl ML, Lee EK, Peng L, Didomenico P (2015) Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability. Skelet Radiol 44:1627–1635. doi:10.​1007/​s00256-015-2207-4 CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Iannotti JP, Weiner S, Rodriguez E, Subhas N, Patterson TE, Jun BJ, Ricchetti ET (2015) Three-dimensional imaging and templating improve glenoid implant positioning. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:651–658. doi:10.2106/JBJS.N.00493 CrossRefPubMed Iannotti JP, Weiner S, Rodriguez E, Subhas N, Patterson TE, Jun BJ, Ricchetti ET (2015) Three-dimensional imaging and templating improve glenoid implant positioning. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:651–658. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​N.​00493 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kircher J, Wiedemann M, Magosch P, Lichtenberg S, Habermeyer P (2009) Improved accuracy of glenoid positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty with intraoperative navigation: a prospective-randomized clinical study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 18:515–520. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.014 CrossRef Kircher J, Wiedemann M, Magosch P, Lichtenberg S, Habermeyer P (2009) Improved accuracy of glenoid positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty with intraoperative navigation: a prospective-randomized clinical study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 18:515–520. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jse.​2009.​03.​014 CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Shieh G (2014) Sample size requirements for the design of reliability studies: precision consideration. Behav Res Methods 46:808–822CrossRefPubMed Shieh G (2014) Sample size requirements for the design of reliability studies: precision consideration. Behav Res Methods 46:808–822CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
16.
go back to reference Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC (2003) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley, HobokenCrossRef Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC (2003) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley, HobokenCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Walch G, Badet R, Boulahia A, Khoury A (1999) Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 14:756–760CrossRefPubMed Walch G, Badet R, Boulahia A, Khoury A (1999) Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 14:756–760CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mallon WJ, Brown HR, Vogler JB 3rd, Martinez S (1992) Radiographic and geometric anatomy of the scapula. Clin Orthop Relat Res 277:142–154 Mallon WJ, Brown HR, Vogler JB 3rd, Martinez S (1992) Radiographic and geometric anatomy of the scapula. Clin Orthop Relat Res 277:142–154
19.
go back to reference von Schroeder HP, Kuiper SD, Botte MJ (2001) Osseous anatomy of the scapula. Clin Orthop Relat Res 383:131–139CrossRef von Schroeder HP, Kuiper SD, Botte MJ (2001) Osseous anatomy of the scapula. Clin Orthop Relat Res 383:131–139CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bryce CD, Davison AC, Lewis GS, Wang L, Flemming DJ, Armstrong AD (2010) Two-dimensional glenoid version measurements vary with coronal and sagittal scapular rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:692–699. doi:10.2106/JBJS.I.00177 CrossRefPubMed Bryce CD, Davison AC, Lewis GS, Wang L, Flemming DJ, Armstrong AD (2010) Two-dimensional glenoid version measurements vary with coronal and sagittal scapular rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:692–699. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​I.​00177 CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
go back to reference Walch G, Vezeridis PS, Boileau P, Deransart P, Chaoui J (2015) Three-dimensional planning and use of patient-specific guides improve glenoid component position: an in vitro study. Shoulder Elb Surg 24:302–309. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2014.05.029 CrossRef Walch G, Vezeridis PS, Boileau P, Deransart P, Chaoui J (2015) Three-dimensional planning and use of patient-specific guides improve glenoid component position: an in vitro study. Shoulder Elb Surg 24:302–309. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jse.​2014.​05.​029 CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Description and reproducibility assessment of a new computerised tomography scan index to measure the glenoid orientation in relation to the anterior glenoid surface
Authors
Constantina Moraiti
Shahnaz Klouche
Jean David Werthel
Thomas Bauer
Philippe Hardy
Publication date
01-05-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3290-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

International Orthopaedics 5/2017 Go to the issue