Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 4/2016

01-04-2016 | Original Paper

A critical analysis of radiographic factors in patients who develop dislocation after elective primary total hip arthroplasty

Authors: Marion Opperer, Yuo-yu Lee, Francisco Nally, Alvaro Blanes Perez, Kaveh Goudarz-Mehdikhani, Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In order to diminish total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocation rate, surgeons strive to achieve adequate component orientation, offset and limb length. In addition, dislocation rate can theoretically be reduced by increasing head diameter and by choosing implants with favorable head-to-neck and cup-to head ratios. We assessed nine radiographic and implant-related parameters associated with an increased risk of dislocation in patients who sustained a dislocation and in those with a stable arthroplasty.

Methods

A total of 1,487 consecutive elective primary THAs performed by a single surgeon, using a posterolateral approach were reviewed at an average follow-up of 18 months (range, 1–112). Fixation was hybrid in 85 % of hips and non-cemented in 15 %. Thirty-eight patients (38 hips, 2.5 %) sustained at least one dislocation. Thirty-seven patients with good quality, standardized anteroposterior radiographs were selected as a “study group”. The study group was matched-paired (1:3) with patients who had a stable arthroplasty based on gender, age, BMI, diagnosis and follow-up. Variables compared between the groups included: head size, cup size, head-to-neck ratio, cup-to-head ratio, leg-length discrepancy, offset, cup inclination, cup version and cup orientation based on the safe zone defined by Lewinnek et al.

Results

None of the nine parameters showed a statistically significant difference between the groups.

Discussion

In this study, 90 % of patients who developed a dislocation had properly positioned acetabular components. In addition, the vast majority of patients in the study group had adequate restoration of limb length and offset. The results of our study may be useful for the orthopedic surgeons who discuss instability following THA surgery, particularly in patients with radiographically sound reconstructions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fackler CD, Poss R (1980) Dislocation in total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 151:169–178PubMed Fackler CD, Poss R (1980) Dislocation in total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 151:169–178PubMed
5.
go back to reference Woo RY, Morrey BF (1982) Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 164:1295–1306 Woo RY, Morrey BF (1982) Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 164:1295–1306
7.
go back to reference Mahoney CR, Pellicci PM (2003) Complications in primary total hip arthroplasty: avoidance and management of dislocations. Instr Course Lect 52:247–255PubMed Mahoney CR, Pellicci PM (2003) Complications in primary total hip arthroplasty: avoidance and management of dislocations. Instr Course Lect 52:247–255PubMed
9.
go back to reference Allami MK, Fender D, Khaw FM, Sandher DR, Esler C, Harper WM et al (2006) Outcome of Charnley total hip replacement across a single health region in England. The results at ten years from a regional arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 88:1293–1298. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.88B10.17933 CrossRef Allami MK, Fender D, Khaw FM, Sandher DR, Esler C, Harper WM et al (2006) Outcome of Charnley total hip replacement across a single health region in England. The results at ten years from a regional arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 88:1293–1298. doi:10.​1302/​0301-620X.​88B10.​17933 CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hedlundh U, Ahnfelt L, Hybbinette CH, Wallinder L, Weckström J, Fredin H (1996) Dislocations and the femoral head size in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 333:226–233CrossRefPubMed Hedlundh U, Ahnfelt L, Hybbinette CH, Wallinder L, Weckström J, Fredin H (1996) Dislocations and the femoral head size in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 333:226–233CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Byström S, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin LI (2003) Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation. Acte Orthop Scand 74:514–524CrossRef Byström S, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin LI (2003) Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation. Acte Orthop Scand 74:514–524CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:217–220PubMed Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:217–220PubMed
21.
go back to reference Pellicci PM, Bostrom M, Poss R (1998) Posterior approach to total hip replacement using enhanced posterior soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355:224–228CrossRefPubMed Pellicci PM, Bostrom M, Poss R (1998) Posterior approach to total hip replacement using enhanced posterior soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355:224–228CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
go back to reference Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS (2005) Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2456–2463. doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02860 CrossRefPubMed Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS (2005) Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2456–2463. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​D.​02860 CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Kelley SS, Lachiewicz PF, Hickman JM, Paterno SM (1998) Relationship of femoral head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation. Clin Orthop 355:163–170CrossRefPubMed Kelley SS, Lachiewicz PF, Hickman JM, Paterno SM (1998) Relationship of femoral head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation. Clin Orthop 355:163–170CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, Zurakowski D, Rubash HE, Freiberg AA et al (2011) The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: Quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Rel Res 469:319–329. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1487-1 CrossRef Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, Zurakowski D, Rubash HE, Freiberg AA et al (2011) The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: Quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Rel Res 469:319–329. doi:10.​1007/​s11999-010-1487-1 CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ackland MK, Bourne WB, Uhthoff HK (1986) Anteversion of the acetabular cup. Measurement of angle after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 68:409–413 Ackland MK, Bourne WB, Uhthoff HK (1986) Anteversion of the acetabular cup. Measurement of angle after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 68:409–413
32.
go back to reference Craiovan B, Renkawitz T, Weber M, Grifka J, Nolte L, Zheng G (2014) Is the acetabular cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty on a two dimension or three dimension model accurate? Int Orthop 38:2009–2015. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2336-8 CrossRefPubMed Craiovan B, Renkawitz T, Weber M, Grifka J, Nolte L, Zheng G (2014) Is the acetabular cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty on a two dimension or three dimension model accurate? Int Orthop 38:2009–2015. doi:10.​1007/​s00264-014-2336-8 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A critical analysis of radiographic factors in patients who develop dislocation after elective primary total hip arthroplasty
Authors
Marion Opperer
Yuo-yu Lee
Francisco Nally
Alvaro Blanes Perez
Kaveh Goudarz-Mehdikhani
Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3022-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

International Orthopaedics 4/2016 Go to the issue