Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 3/2016

01-03-2016 | Original Paper

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how do we perform it? Brazilian orthopedic surgeons’ preference

Authors: Luiz Felipe Morlin Ambra, Fernando Cury Rezende, Bruno Xavier, Felipe Conrado Shumaker, Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Franciozi, Marcos Vinicius Malheiros Luzo

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We evaluated current trends and common practice of Brazilian orthopedic surgeons while selecting approaches for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery.

Methods

Orthopedic surgeons (n = 191) completed a survey consisting of seven questions regarding their profiles and preference for ACL reconstruction techniques.

Results

Most surgeons were from Southeast Brazil (56.6 %) and had specialized in knee surgery (79.5 %); most participants (55.1 %) had worked in this field for > five years, and 46.8 % had performed >50 ACL reconstructions. Further, 93.1 % respondents preferred the hamstring graft. Analysis of preference for the femoral tunnel approach in terms of years of experience showed that surgeons with ten to 15 years’ experience preferred the transtibial approach; those with < five years of experience, the transportal technique; those with >15 years’ experience, the two-incision technique.

Conclusions

Surgeons’ preferences for ACL reconstruction are variable, and are influenced by learning time and availability of tools rather than research evidence.
Literature
1.
5.
go back to reference Biau DJ, Katsahian S, Kartus J, Harilainen A, Feller JA, Sajovic M, Ejerhed L, Zaffagnini S, Ropke M, Nizard R (2009) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Am J Sports Med 37:2470–2478. doi:10.1177/0363546509333006 CrossRefPubMed Biau DJ, Katsahian S, Kartus J, Harilainen A, Feller JA, Sajovic M, Ejerhed L, Zaffagnini S, Ropke M, Nizard R (2009) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Am J Sports Med 37:2470–2478. doi:10.​1177/​0363546509333006​ CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Persson A, Fjeldsgaard K, Gjertsen JE, Kjellsen AB, Engebretsen L, Hole RM, Fevang JM (2014) Increased risk of revision with hamstring tendon grafts compared with patellar tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study of 12,643 patients from the Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Registry, 2004–2012. Am J Sports Med 42:285–291. doi:10.1177/0363546513511419 CrossRefPubMed Persson A, Fjeldsgaard K, Gjertsen JE, Kjellsen AB, Engebretsen L, Hole RM, Fevang JM (2014) Increased risk of revision with hamstring tendon grafts compared with patellar tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study of 12,643 patients from the Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Registry, 2004–2012. Am J Sports Med 42:285–291. doi:10.​1177/​0363546513511419​ CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sadoghi P, Muller PE, Jansson V, van Griensven M, Kropfl A, Fischmeister MF (2011) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a clinical comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone single bundle versus semitendinosus and gracilis double bundle technique. Int Orthop 35:127–133. doi:10.1007/s00264-010-1037-1 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Sadoghi P, Muller PE, Jansson V, van Griensven M, Kropfl A, Fischmeister MF (2011) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a clinical comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone single bundle versus semitendinosus and gracilis double bundle technique. Int Orthop 35:127–133. doi:10.​1007/​s00264-010-1037-1 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Alentorn-Geli E, Lajara F, Samitier G, Cugat R (2010) The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1013–1037. doi:10.1007/s00167-009-0964-0 CrossRefPubMed Alentorn-Geli E, Lajara F, Samitier G, Cugat R (2010) The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1013–1037. doi:10.​1007/​s00167-009-0964-0 CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bedi A, Musahl V, Steuber V, Kendoff D, Choi D, Allen AA, Pearle AD, Altchek DW (2011) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique. Arthroscopy 27:380–390. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2010.07.018 CrossRefPubMed Bedi A, Musahl V, Steuber V, Kendoff D, Choi D, Allen AA, Pearle AD, Altchek DW (2011) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique. Arthroscopy 27:380–390. doi:10.​1016/​j.​arthro.​2010.​07.​018 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Riboh JC, Hasselblad V, Godin JA, Mather RC 3rd (2013) Transtibial versus independent drilling techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Am J Sports Med 41:2693–2702. doi:10.1177/0363546513506979 CrossRefPubMed Riboh JC, Hasselblad V, Godin JA, Mather RC 3rd (2013) Transtibial versus independent drilling techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Am J Sports Med 41:2693–2702. doi:10.​1177/​0363546513506979​ CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how do we perform it? Brazilian orthopedic surgeons’ preference
Authors
Luiz Felipe Morlin Ambra
Fernando Cury Rezende
Bruno Xavier
Felipe Conrado Shumaker
Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Franciozi
Marcos Vinicius Malheiros Luzo
Publication date
01-03-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2905-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

International Orthopaedics 3/2016 Go to the issue