Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 5/2016

01-05-2016 | Original Paper

Which AO/OTA 31-A2 pertrochanteric fractures can be treated with a dynamic hip screw without developing a lateral wall fracture? A CT-based study

Authors: Gaurav Sharma, Ravijot Singh, Kiran Kumar GN, Vaibhav Jain, Ankit Gupta, Shivanand Gamanagatti, Kamran Farooque, Vijay Sharma

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether radiographic measurements derived from standard computed tomography (CT) evaluation can be used to predict likelihood of a peri-operative lateral femoral wall fracture in AO/OTA 31-A2 pertrochanteric fractures treated with a dynamic hip screw (DHS).

Methods

Fifty-one patients with AO/OTA 31-A2 classified pertrochanteric fractures were evaluated using a pre-operative CT scan of the pelvis with both hips. Dimensions of the lateral wall were calculated for each patient using four parameters: (1) height of the lateral wall above the vastus ridge; (2) circumference of the lateral wall 2 cm below the vastus ridge at an angle of 135°; this circumference was further divided into an anterior, lateral and posterior component; (3) cortical thickness at the centre of the lateral component of the lateral wall; and (4) cortical index. All patients were treated with a 135° DHS. Postoperative radiographs were assessed for lateral femoral wall fracture.

Results

Patients with a lateral wall fracture (17/51) had a smaller circumference (4.47 cm vs 5.44 cm p value <0.001) as well as a lower height of the lateral femoral wall (1.37 cm vs 2.21 p value < 0.001). Analysis of the three components of the circumference revealed a significant difference for the anterior component only and not for the lateral and posterior components. There was no statistical difference in the cortical thickness or cortical index in the two groups. The cutoff values for height of the lateral wall and anterior component were calculated using ROC curves and found to be 1.68 cm (AUC 0.918) and 2.10 cm (AUC 0.851) respectively.

Conclusion

AO/OTA 31-A2 pertrochanteric fractures with a lateral wall height of > 1.68 cm and an anterior component of > 2.10 cm in circumference are not likely to sustain a lateral wall fracture when treated with a DHS.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barton TM, Gleeson R, Topliss C et al (2010) A comparison of the long Gamma nail with the sliding hip screw for the treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 fractures of the proximal part of the femur: a prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:792–798CrossRefPubMed Barton TM, Gleeson R, Topliss C et al (2010) A comparison of the long Gamma nail with the sliding hip screw for the treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 fractures of the proximal part of the femur: a prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:792–798CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gotfried Y (2004) The lateral trochanteric wall: a key element in the reconstruction of unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 425:82–86CrossRefPubMed Gotfried Y (2004) The lateral trochanteric wall: a key element in the reconstruction of unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 425:82–86CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Langford J, Pillai G, Ugliailoro AD, Yang E (2011) Perioperative lateral trochanteric wall fractures: sliding hip screw versus percutaneous compression plate for intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Orthop Trauma 25:191–195CrossRefPubMed Langford J, Pillai G, Ugliailoro AD, Yang E (2011) Perioperative lateral trochanteric wall fractures: sliding hip screw versus percutaneous compression plate for intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Orthop Trauma 25:191–195CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Palm H, Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Hip fracture study group (2007) Integrity of the lateral femoral wall in intertrochanteric hip fractures: an important predictor of a reoperation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:470–475CrossRefPubMed Palm H, Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Hip fracture study group (2007) Integrity of the lateral femoral wall in intertrochanteric hip fractures: an important predictor of a reoperation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:470–475CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Im G, Shin YW, Song YJ (2005) Potentially unstable intertrochanteric fractures. J Orthop Trauma 19:5–9CrossRefPubMed Im G, Shin YW, Song YJ (2005) Potentially unstable intertrochanteric fractures. J Orthop Trauma 19:5–9CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Park SY, Park J, Rhee DJ et al (2007) Anterior or posterior obliquity of the lag screw in the lateral view—does it affect the sliding characteristics on unstable trochanteric fractures? Injury 38:785–791CrossRefPubMed Park SY, Park J, Rhee DJ et al (2007) Anterior or posterior obliquity of the lag screw in the lateral view—does it affect the sliding characteristics on unstable trochanteric fractures? Injury 38:785–791CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hsu CE, Shih CM, Wang CC, Huang KC (2013) Lateral femoral wall thickness: a reliable predictor of post-operative lateral wall fracture in intertrochanteric fractures. Bone Joint J 95-B:1134–1138CrossRefPubMed Hsu CE, Shih CM, Wang CC, Huang KC (2013) Lateral femoral wall thickness: a reliable predictor of post-operative lateral wall fracture in intertrochanteric fractures. Bone Joint J 95-B:1134–1138CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Boopalan PR, Oh JK, Kim TY et al (2012) Incidence and radiologic outcome of intraoperative lateral wall fractures in OTA 31A1 and A2 fractures treated with cephalomedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 26:638–642CrossRefPubMed Boopalan PR, Oh JK, Kim TY et al (2012) Incidence and radiologic outcome of intraoperative lateral wall fractures in OTA 31A1 and A2 fractures treated with cephalomedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 26:638–642CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bong MR, Patel V, Iesaka K, Egol KA, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ (2004) Comparison of a sliding hip screw with a trochanteric lateral support plate to an intramedullary hip screw for fixation of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures: a cadaver study. J Trauma 56:791–794CrossRefPubMed Bong MR, Patel V, Iesaka K, Egol KA, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ (2004) Comparison of a sliding hip screw with a trochanteric lateral support plate to an intramedullary hip screw for fixation of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures: a cadaver study. J Trauma 56:791–794CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Chang CY, Yew CW (2012) Clinical results of unstable intertrochanteric fracture treated by dynamic hip screw with tension band wire reinforcement. Formos J Musculoskelet Disord 03:99–103CrossRef Chang CY, Yew CW (2012) Clinical results of unstable intertrochanteric fracture treated by dynamic hip screw with tension band wire reinforcement. Formos J Musculoskelet Disord 03:99–103CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cavaignac E, Lecoq M, Ponsot A et al (2013) CT scan does not improve the reproducibility of trochanteric fracture classification: a prospective observational study of 53 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:46–51CrossRefPubMed Cavaignac E, Lecoq M, Ponsot A et al (2013) CT scan does not improve the reproducibility of trochanteric fracture classification: a prospective observational study of 53 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:46–51CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lavelle DG (2007) Fractures and dislocations of the hip. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH (eds) Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics, 11th edn. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 3237–3309 Lavelle DG (2007) Fractures and dislocations of the hip. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH (eds) Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics, 11th edn. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 3237–3309
13.
go back to reference Haidukewych GJ, Israel TA, Berry DJ (2001) Reverse obliquity fractures of the intertrochanteric region of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:643–650PubMed Haidukewych GJ, Israel TA, Berry DJ (2001) Reverse obliquity fractures of the intertrochanteric region of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:643–650PubMed
14.
go back to reference Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM et al (1995) The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1058–1064PubMed Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM et al (1995) The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1058–1064PubMed
15.
go back to reference Andruszkow H, Frink M, Frömke C et al (2012) Tip apex distance, hip screw placement, and neck shaft angle as potential risk factors for cut-out failure of hip screws after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop 36:2347–2354CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Andruszkow H, Frink M, Frömke C et al (2012) Tip apex distance, hip screw placement, and neck shaft angle as potential risk factors for cut-out failure of hip screws after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop 36:2347–2354CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Pervez H, Parker MJ, Pryor GA, Lutchman L, Chirodian N (2002) Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: a study of the reliability of current systems. Injury 33:713–715CrossRefPubMed Pervez H, Parker MJ, Pryor GA, Lutchman L, Chirodian N (2002) Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: a study of the reliability of current systems. Injury 33:713–715CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sah AP, Thornhill TS, LeBoff MS, Glowacki J (2007) Correlation of plain radiographic indices of hip with quantitative bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 18:1119–1126CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sah AP, Thornhill TS, LeBoff MS, Glowacki J (2007) Correlation of plain radiographic indices of hip with quantitative bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 18:1119–1126CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Yun HH, Yi JW, Lim DS, Park SC, Oh SR (2011) Reliability of the radiologic measurement methods for assessment of osteoporosis using the digital hip radiograph. J Korean Hip Soc 23:142–150CrossRef Yun HH, Yi JW, Lim DS, Park SC, Oh SR (2011) Reliability of the radiologic measurement methods for assessment of osteoporosis using the digital hip radiograph. J Korean Hip Soc 23:142–150CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Im GI, Park PG, Moon SW (2012) The relationship between radiological parameters from plain hip radiographs and bone mineral density in a Korean population. J Bone Miner Metab 30:504–508CrossRefPubMed Im GI, Park PG, Moon SW (2012) The relationship between radiological parameters from plain hip radiographs and bone mineral density in a Korean population. J Bone Miner Metab 30:504–508CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Chen F, Wang Z, Bhattacharyya T (2014) Absence of femoral cortical thickening in long-term bisphosphonate users: implications for atypical femur fractures. Bone 62:64–66CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen F, Wang Z, Bhattacharyya T (2014) Absence of femoral cortical thickening in long-term bisphosphonate users: implications for atypical femur fractures. Bone 62:64–66CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Koeppen VA, Schilcher J, Aspenberg P (2012) Atypical fractures do not have a thicker cortex. Osteoporos Int 23:2893–2896CrossRefPubMed Koeppen VA, Schilcher J, Aspenberg P (2012) Atypical fractures do not have a thicker cortex. Osteoporos Int 23:2893–2896CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Baumgärtner R, Heeren N, Quast D, Babst R, Brunner A (2015) Is the cortical thickness index a valid parameter to assess bone mineral density in geriatric patients with hip fractures? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:805–810CrossRefPubMed Baumgärtner R, Heeren N, Quast D, Babst R, Brunner A (2015) Is the cortical thickness index a valid parameter to assess bone mineral density in geriatric patients with hip fractures? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:805–810CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Which AO/OTA 31-A2 pertrochanteric fractures can be treated with a dynamic hip screw without developing a lateral wall fracture? A CT-based study
Authors
Gaurav Sharma
Ravijot Singh
Kiran Kumar GN
Vaibhav Jain
Ankit Gupta
Shivanand Gamanagatti
Kamran Farooque
Vijay Sharma
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2835-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

International Orthopaedics 5/2016 Go to the issue