Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 9/2015

01-09-2015 | Original Paper

Postoperative periprosthetic fractures in patients with an Exeter stem due to a femoral neck fracture: cumulative incidence and surgical outcome

Authors: Christian Inngul, Anders Enocson

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 9/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to report on the cumulative incidence and the outcome of surgically-treated postoperative PPFs in patients with femoral neck fractures treated with a THA or HA using an Exeter stem.

Methods

A consecutive series of patients operated during 1998–2010 due to a non-pathological femoral neck fracture using an Exeter stem were included in this cohort study. Patients were followed until 2012, or death, in order to obtain information about reoperations due to postoperative PPFs, and subsequent re-operations after surgery due to PPFs. In addition to local audit data the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare’s registry was used to identify patients who had been re-operated upon elsewhere in Sweden.

Results

A total of 2,757 patients (median age 82 years, 2,019 females) were identified and included in the study. Of these patients, 63 (2.3 %) sustained a postoperative PPF that was treated surgically. The majority of the Vancouver B1 (n = 21/23) and C (n = 14/14) fractures were treated using open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), whereas most of the B2 (n = 16/25) fractures and the only B3 fracture were treated with stem revision. Three (4.8 %) patients were subsequently re-operated upon due to fracture-related complications, all B2 fractures, and were treated with ORIF (n = 2) or stem revision (n = 1).

Conclusion

The cumulative incidence of surgically treated PPFs was considerable among patients with Exeter stems operated due to a femoral neck fracture. The re-operation rate due to fracture-related complications was highest among patients with B2 fractures.
Literature
1.
4.
go back to reference Samuelsson B, Hedstrom MI, Ponzer S, Soderqvist A, Samnegard E, Thorngren KG, Cederholm T, Saaf M, Dalen N (2009) Gender differences and cognitive aspects on functional outcome after hip fracture–a 2 years’ follow-up of 2,134 patients. Age Ageing 38:686–692. doi:10.1093/ageing/afp169 CrossRefPubMed Samuelsson B, Hedstrom MI, Ponzer S, Soderqvist A, Samnegard E, Thorngren KG, Cederholm T, Saaf M, Dalen N (2009) Gender differences and cognitive aspects on functional outcome after hip fracture–a 2 years’ follow-up of 2,134 patients. Age Ageing 38:686–692. doi:10.​1093/​ageing/​afp169 CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Duncan CP, Masri BA (1995) Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44:293–304PubMed Duncan CP, Masri BA (1995) Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44:293–304PubMed
6.
go back to reference Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64:17–19PubMed Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64:17–19PubMed
7.
go back to reference Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G (2005) Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplast 20:857–865. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2005.02.001 CrossRef Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G (2005) Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplast 20:857–865. doi:10.​1016/​j.​arth.​2005.​02.​001 CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hedbeck CJ, Enocson A, Lapidus G, Blomfeldt R, Tornkvist H, Ponzer S, Tidermark J (2011) Comparison of bipolar hemiarthroplasty with total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a concise four-year follow-up of a randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:445–450. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.00474 CrossRefPubMed Hedbeck CJ, Enocson A, Lapidus G, Blomfeldt R, Tornkvist H, Ponzer S, Tidermark J (2011) Comparison of bipolar hemiarthroplasty with total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a concise four-year follow-up of a randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:445–450. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​J.​00474 CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Johansson T (2014) Internal fixation compared with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures: a minimum fifteen-year follow-up study of a previously reported randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:e46. doi:10.2106/JBJS.K.00244 CrossRefPubMed Johansson T (2014) Internal fixation compared with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures: a minimum fifteen-year follow-up study of a previously reported randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:e46. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​K.​00244 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Berry DJ (2002) Management of periprosthetic fractures: the hip. J Arthroplast 17:11–13CrossRef Berry DJ (2002) Management of periprosthetic fractures: the hip. J Arthroplast 17:11–13CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tsiridis E, Haddad FS, Gie GA (2003) The management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip replacements. Injury 34:95–105CrossRefPubMed Tsiridis E, Haddad FS, Gie GA (2003) The management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip replacements. Injury 34:95–105CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tsiridis E, Pavlou G, Venkatesh R, Bobak P, Gie G (2009) Periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip arthroplasty: current concepts in their management. Hip Int J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther 19:75–86 Tsiridis E, Pavlou G, Venkatesh R, Bobak P, Gie G (2009) Periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip arthroplasty: current concepts in their management. Hip Int J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther 19:75–86
15.
go back to reference Holzapfel BM, Prodinger PM, Hoberg M, Meffert R, Rudert M, Gradinger R (2010) Periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty: classification, diagnosis and therapy strategies. Orthopade 39:519–535. doi:10.1007/s00132-010-1612-6 CrossRefPubMed Holzapfel BM, Prodinger PM, Hoberg M, Meffert R, Rudert M, Gradinger R (2010) Periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty: classification, diagnosis and therapy strategies. Orthopade 39:519–535. doi:10.​1007/​s00132-010-1612-6 CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sen R, Prasad P, Kumar S, Nagi O (2007) Periprosthetic femoral fractures around well fixed implants: a simple method of fixation using LC-DCP with trochanteric purchase. Acta Orthop Belg 73:200–206PubMed Sen R, Prasad P, Kumar S, Nagi O (2007) Periprosthetic femoral fractures around well fixed implants: a simple method of fixation using LC-DCP with trochanteric purchase. Acta Orthop Belg 73:200–206PubMed
19.
go back to reference Masri BA, Meek RM, Duncan CP (2004) Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:80–95 Masri BA, Meek RM, Duncan CP (2004) Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:80–95
20.
23.
go back to reference Pavlou G, Panteliadis P, Macdonald D, Timperley JA, Gie G, Bancroft G, Tsiridis E (2011) A review of 202 periprosthetic fractures–stem revision and allograft improves outcome for type B fractures. Hip Int J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther 21:21–29 Pavlou G, Panteliadis P, Macdonald D, Timperley JA, Gie G, Bancroft G, Tsiridis E (2011) A review of 202 periprosthetic fractures–stem revision and allograft improves outcome for type B fractures. Hip Int J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther 21:21–29
25.
go back to reference Schwarzkopf R, Oni JK, Marwin SE (2013) Total hip arthroplasty periprosthetic femoral fractures: a review of classification and current treatment. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 71:68–78 Schwarzkopf R, Oni JK, Marwin SE (2013) Total hip arthroplasty periprosthetic femoral fractures: a review of classification and current treatment. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 71:68–78
Metadata
Title
Postoperative periprosthetic fractures in patients with an Exeter stem due to a femoral neck fracture: cumulative incidence and surgical outcome
Authors
Christian Inngul
Anders Enocson
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2570-0

Other articles of this Issue 9/2015

International Orthopaedics 9/2015 Go to the issue