Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 2/2014

01-02-2014 | Original Paper

Predictive factors for failure after total knee replacement revision

Authors: Rafael Luque, Belen Rizo, Antonio Urda, Rodrigo Garcia-Crespo, Enrique Moro, Fernando Marco, Luis López-Duran

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We used the Optetrak Condylar Constrained (CCK) implant, a modular and constrained knee implant as replacement for a failed primary arthroplasty, to assess the survivorship, the complications, the clinical, radiological, and functional situation, and the quality of life of those patients in whom a CCK had been implanted in recent years in order to find predictive pre-operative conditions of survival and clinical outcomes.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of 125 CCK implanted between 1999 and 2005. The mean follow-up was nine years (range, seven to 13). Mean age was 73.6 years. A total of 78 % of the revised TKA were cemented and 66 % were CR. We assessed the pre-operative, the operative and the postoperative conditions studying the medical files of all the patients. In order to study the functional and clinical situation we used the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score and the Knee Society score (KSS), both clinical and functional. We analysed all the X-rays using the Knee Society Roentgenographic evaluation. The quality of life was studied using the Oxford knee score (OKS).

Results

The mean results of the KSS clinical and the KSS functional were 68.24 and 63.85, respectively. There were not any conditions associated with poor results of the knees (p > 0.05). The global survival at 24 months was 92.7 %, at 60 months 87.8 % and at 96 months it was 87.8 %. There were some conditions associated with poor survival of the knees, e.g. patients were younger than 70 years old, rheumatic diseases, kidney faliure, tibial tuberosity osteotomy, PS primary arthroplasty, revision before five years and septic loosening.

Conclusions

Based on these results there are some pre-operative factors that change the survival of the total knee replacement revision.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):780–785PubMedCrossRef Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):780–785PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sheng P, Lehto M, Kataja M, Halonen P, Moilanen T (2004) Patient outcome following revision total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 28:78–81PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Sheng P, Lehto M, Kataja M, Halonen P, Moilanen T (2004) Patient outcome following revision total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 28:78–81PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Singh JA, O’Byrne MM, Harmsen WS, Lewallen DG (2010) Predictors of moderate-severe functional limitation 2 and 5 years after revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 25(7):1091–1095CrossRef Singh JA, O’Byrne MM, Harmsen WS, Lewallen DG (2010) Predictors of moderate-severe functional limitation 2 and 5 years after revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 25(7):1091–1095CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Haas SB, Insall JN, Montgomery W, Windsor RE (1995) Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of modular components with stems inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1700–1707PubMed Haas SB, Insall JN, Montgomery W, Windsor RE (1995) Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of modular components with stems inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1700–1707PubMed
5.
go back to reference Rand JA, Trousdale RT, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS (2003) Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:259–265PubMed Rand JA, Trousdale RT, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS (2003) Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:259–265PubMed
6.
go back to reference Gandhi R, Tsvetkov D, Davey JR, Mahomed NN (2009) Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(7):889–895PubMedCrossRef Gandhi R, Tsvetkov D, Davey JR, Mahomed NN (2009) Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(7):889–895PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Barrack RL, Engh G, Rorabeck C, Sawhney J, Woolfrey M (2000) Patient satisfaction and outcome after septic versus aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15(8):990–993PubMedCrossRef Barrack RL, Engh G, Rorabeck C, Sawhney J, Woolfrey M (2000) Patient satisfaction and outcome after septic versus aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15(8):990–993PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wang CJ, Hsieh MC, Huang TW (2004) Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction in aseptic and septic revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee 11:45–49PubMedCrossRef Wang CJ, Hsieh MC, Huang TW (2004) Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction in aseptic and septic revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee 11:45–49PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lee JK, Kim SJ, Choi CH, Chung HK (2012) Revision total knee arthroplasty using a constrained condylar knee prosthesis in conjunction with a posterior stabilized articular polyethylene. J Arthroplasty 28(4):566–569 Lee JK, Kim SJ, Choi CH, Chung HK (2012) Revision total knee arthroplasty using a constrained condylar knee prosthesis in conjunction with a posterior stabilized articular polyethylene. J Arthroplasty 28(4):566–569
11.
go back to reference Dripps RD, Lamont A, Eckenhoff JE (1961) The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. JAMA 178:261–266PubMedCrossRef Dripps RD, Lamont A, Eckenhoff JE (1961) The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. JAMA 178:261–266PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Weaver F, Hynes D, Hopkinson W et al (2003) Preoperative risks and outcomes of hip and knee arthroplasty in the Veterans Health Administration. J Arthroplasty 18:693–701PubMedCrossRef Weaver F, Hynes D, Hopkinson W et al (2003) Preoperative risks and outcomes of hip and knee arthroplasty in the Veterans Health Administration. J Arthroplasty 18:693–701PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Frederick C, Ewald MD (1989) The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 248:9–12 Frederick C, Ewald MD (1989) The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 248:9–12
14.
go back to reference Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14PubMed Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14PubMed
15.
go back to reference Asif S, Choon DSK (2005) Midterm results of cemented Press Fit Condylar Sigma total knee arthroplasty system. J Orthop Surg 13(3):280–284 Asif S, Choon DSK (2005) Midterm results of cemented Press Fit Condylar Sigma total knee arthroplasty system. J Orthop Surg 13(3):280–284
16.
go back to reference Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(1):63–69PubMedCrossRef Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(1):63–69PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Saleh KJ, Dykes DC, Tweedie RL, Heck DA (2002) Functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty revision: a metaanalysis. J Arthroplasty 17:967–977PubMedCrossRef Saleh KJ, Dykes DC, Tweedie RL, Heck DA (2002) Functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty revision: a metaanalysis. J Arthroplasty 17:967–977PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Saleh KJ, Hoeffel DP, Kassim, Burstein C (2003) Complications after revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Supplement 1):72–75 Saleh KJ, Hoeffel DP, Kassim, Burstein C (2003) Complications after revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Supplement 1):72–75
19.
go back to reference Sheng PY, Konttinen L, Lehto M, Ogino D, Jamsen E, Nevalainen J, Pajamaki J, Halonen P, Konttinen YT (2006) Revision total knee arthroplasty: 1990 through 2002. A review of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(7):1425–1430PubMedCrossRef Sheng PY, Konttinen L, Lehto M, Ogino D, Jamsen E, Nevalainen J, Pajamaki J, Halonen P, Konttinen YT (2006) Revision total knee arthroplasty: 1990 through 2002. A review of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(7):1425–1430PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Incavo S, Wild J, Coughlin M et al (2007) Early revision for component malrotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 8:458–464 Incavo S, Wild J, Coughlin M et al (2007) Early revision for component malrotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 8:458–464
21.
go back to reference Mulhall KJ, Ghomrawi HM, Scully S et al (2006) Current etiologies and modes of faliure in total knee arthroplasty revision. Clin Orthop 446:45–50PubMedCrossRef Mulhall KJ, Ghomrawi HM, Scully S et al (2006) Current etiologies and modes of faliure in total knee arthroplasty revision. Clin Orthop 446:45–50PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Van den Broek CM, Van Hellemondt, Jacobs, Wymenga (2006) Step-cut tibial tubercle osteotomy for access in revision total knee replacement. Knee 13:430–434PubMedCrossRef Van den Broek CM, Van Hellemondt, Jacobs, Wymenga (2006) Step-cut tibial tubercle osteotomy for access in revision total knee replacement. Knee 13:430–434PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sternheim A, Lochab J, Drexler M, Kuzyk P, Safir O, Gross A, Backstein D (2012) The benefit of revision knee arthroplasty for component malrotation after primary total knee replacement. Int Orthop 36(12):2473–2478PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Sternheim A, Lochab J, Drexler M, Kuzyk P, Safir O, Gross A, Backstein D (2012) The benefit of revision knee arthroplasty for component malrotation after primary total knee replacement. Int Orthop 36(12):2473–2478PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kane RL, Saleh KJ, Wilt TJ, Bershadsky B, Cross WW 3rd, MacDonald RM, Rutks I (2003) Total knee replacement. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Number 86. AHRQ Publication Number 04-E006-1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville Kane RL, Saleh KJ, Wilt TJ, Bershadsky B, Cross WW 3rd, MacDonald RM, Rutks I (2003) Total knee replacement. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Number 86. AHRQ Publication Number 04-E006-1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville
25.
go back to reference Kane RL, Saleh KJ, Wilt TJ, Bershadsky B (2005) The functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(8):1719–1724PubMedCrossRef Kane RL, Saleh KJ, Wilt TJ, Bershadsky B (2005) The functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(8):1719–1724PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Robinson RP (2005) Five-year follow-up of primary Optetrak Posterior Stabilized total knee arthroplasties in osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 20(7):927–931PubMedCrossRef Robinson RP (2005) Five-year follow-up of primary Optetrak Posterior Stabilized total knee arthroplasties in osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 20(7):927–931PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference García-Crespo R, Marco F, Moro LE, Ariza G, Luque R, López-Durán L (2011) Midterm results of optetrak posterior-stabilized total knee system after 7 to 12 years in a University Hospital. J Arthroplasty 26(8):1326–1332PubMedCrossRef García-Crespo R, Marco F, Moro LE, Ariza G, Luque R, López-Durán L (2011) Midterm results of optetrak posterior-stabilized total knee system after 7 to 12 years in a University Hospital. J Arthroplasty 26(8):1326–1332PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Thelu CE, Pasquier G, Maynou C, Migaud H (2012) Poor results of the Optetrak™ cemented posterior stabilized knee prosthesis after a mean 25-month follow-up: analysis of 110 prostheses. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(4):413–420PubMedCrossRef Thelu CE, Pasquier G, Maynou C, Migaud H (2012) Poor results of the Optetrak™ cemented posterior stabilized knee prosthesis after a mean 25-month follow-up: analysis of 110 prostheses. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(4):413–420PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Anderson JA, Baldini A, MacDonald JH, Pellicc PM, Sculco T (2006) Primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty without stem extensions for the valgus knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:199–203PubMedCrossRef Anderson JA, Baldini A, MacDonald JH, Pellicc PM, Sculco T (2006) Primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty without stem extensions for the valgus knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:199–203PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Abbas D, Gunn RS (2006) Medium-term results of the scorpio total knee replacement. Knee 13:307–311PubMedCrossRef Abbas D, Gunn RS (2006) Medium-term results of the scorpio total knee replacement. Knee 13:307–311PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Nakama GY, Peccin MS, Almeida GJ, Lira Neto Ode A, Queiroz AA, Navarro RD (2012) Cemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 17:10, CD006193 Nakama GY, Peccin MS, Almeida GJ, Lira Neto Ode A, Queiroz AA, Navarro RD (2012) Cemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 17:10, CD006193
32.
go back to reference Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M (2001) Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 392:315–318PubMedCrossRef Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M (2001) Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 392:315–318PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Deehan DJ, Murray JD, Birdsall PD et al (2006) Quality of life after knee revision arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 77:761PubMedCrossRef Deehan DJ, Murray JD, Birdsall PD et al (2006) Quality of life after knee revision arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 77:761PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Pun SY, Ries MD (2008) Effect of gender and preoperative diagnosis on results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2701–2707PubMedCrossRef Pun SY, Ries MD (2008) Effect of gender and preoperative diagnosis on results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2701–2707PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL et al (2005) Outcome comparison of partial and full component revision TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:131–142PubMedCrossRef Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL et al (2005) Outcome comparison of partial and full component revision TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:131–142PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Ong KL, Lau E, Suggs J, Kurtz SM, Manley MT (2010) Risk of subsequent revision after primary and revision total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:3070–3076PubMedCrossRef Ong KL, Lau E, Suggs J, Kurtz SM, Manley MT (2010) Risk of subsequent revision after primary and revision total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:3070–3076PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Meijer MF, Reininga IH, Boerboom AL, Stevens M, Bulstra SK (2013) Poorer survival after a primary implant during revision total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 37(3):415–419PubMedCrossRef Meijer MF, Reininga IH, Boerboom AL, Stevens M, Bulstra SK (2013) Poorer survival after a primary implant during revision total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 37(3):415–419PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Suárez J, Griffin W, Springer B, Fehring T, Mason JB, Odum S (2008) Why do revision knee arthroplasties fail? J Arthroplasty 23(suppl 1):99–103PubMedCrossRef Suárez J, Griffin W, Springer B, Fehring T, Mason JB, Odum S (2008) Why do revision knee arthroplasties fail? J Arthroplasty 23(suppl 1):99–103PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Jamsen E, Huhtala H, Puolakka T, Moilanen T (2009) Risk factors for infection alter knee arthroplasty: a register-based analysis of 43,149 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(1):38–47PubMedCrossRef Jamsen E, Huhtala H, Puolakka T, Moilanen T (2009) Risk factors for infection alter knee arthroplasty: a register-based analysis of 43,149 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(1):38–47PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS, Dennos DA, Komistek AD, Murray DW et al (2000) Mobile-bearing knee replacement. Concepts and results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:1020–1041 Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS, Dennos DA, Komistek AD, Murray DW et al (2000) Mobile-bearing knee replacement. Concepts and results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:1020–1041
41.
go back to reference Kim YH, Kim JS (2009) Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(6):1440–1447PubMedCrossRef Kim YH, Kim JS (2009) Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(6):1440–1447PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Mortazavi SM, Molligan J, Austin MS, Purtill JJ, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J (2011) Failure following revision total knee arthroplasty: infection is the major cause. Int Orthop 35(8):1157–1164PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mortazavi SM, Molligan J, Austin MS, Purtill JJ, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J (2011) Failure following revision total knee arthroplasty: infection is the major cause. Int Orthop 35(8):1157–1164PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Sierra RJ, Cooney WPIV, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Rand JA (2004) Reoperations after 3200 revision TKAs: rates, etiology, and lessons learned. Clin Orthop Relat Res 425:200–206PubMedCrossRef Sierra RJ, Cooney WPIV, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Rand JA (2004) Reoperations after 3200 revision TKAs: rates, etiology, and lessons learned. Clin Orthop Relat Res 425:200–206PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predictive factors for failure after total knee replacement revision
Authors
Rafael Luque
Belen Rizo
Antonio Urda
Rodrigo Garcia-Crespo
Enrique Moro
Fernando Marco
Luis López-Duran
Publication date
01-02-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2268-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

International Orthopaedics 2/2014 Go to the issue

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO REFEREES

Acknowledgement to referees