Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 1/2013

01-01-2013 | Original Paper

Sports activities after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Oxford III—What can we expect?

Authors: Matthias F. Pietschmann, Lisa Wohlleb, Patrick Weber, Florian Schmidutz, Andreas Ficklscherer, Mehmet F. Gülecyüz, Elem Safi, Thomas R. Niethammer, Volkmar Jansson, Peter E. Müller

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Excellent long-term results have been reported for implantation of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). In many patients the desire for improvement in function often includes an aspiration to return to sports. The purpose of our study was to evaluate physical activities after medial Oxford-III (Biomet) UKA surgery.

Methods

Patients’ physical activity before and after the surgery was assessed using a self reporting questionnaire. We used the Oxford knee scoring system (OKS), the WOMAC-, the Knee society- (KSS) and the UCLA-score to assess postoperative knee function. The mean follow-up was 4.2 years. The female-to-male ratio was 1.3:1. The mean age at surgery was 65.3 years.

Results

Of the 131 patients studied 78 participated in some kind of sports before surgery (mean age 64.4 years), while 53 patients did not perform any sports (mean age 66.5 years) (p > 0.05). At follow-up the patients in the active group were significantly younger than the patients in the inactive group (p < 0.05). The majority of patients (80.1 %) returned to their level of sports activity after UKA surgery. Six patients took up sports after surgery while 15 patients stopped their sports. Among the active patients we found a shift from high- towards low-impact sports. The active patients had significantly higher scores for the OKS, KSS, WOMAC and UCLA score. The complication rate was comparable in both groups.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that a high degree of patient satisfaction in terms of sports activity can be achieved using the Oxford-III UKA for medial osteoarthritis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Amendola A, Bonasia DE (2010) Results of high tibial osteotomy: review of the literature. Int Orthop 34(2):155–160PubMedCrossRef Amendola A, Bonasia DE (2010) Results of high tibial osteotomy: review of the literature. Int Orthop 34(2):155–160PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15(12):1833–1840PubMed Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15(12):1833–1840PubMed
3.
go back to reference Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(1):63–69PubMedCrossRef Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(1):63–69PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Emerson RH Jr, Higgins LL (2008) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(1):118–122PubMedCrossRef Emerson RH Jr, Higgins LL (2008) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(1):118–122PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Englund M, Lohmander LS (2005) Patellofemoral osteoarthritis coexistent with tibiofemoral osteoarthritis in a meniscectomy population. Ann Rheum Dis 64(12):1721–1726PubMedCrossRef Englund M, Lohmander LS (2005) Patellofemoral osteoarthritis coexistent with tibiofemoral osteoarthritis in a meniscectomy population. Ann Rheum Dis 64(12):1721–1726PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fisher N, Agarwal M, Reuben SF, Johnson DS, Turner PG (2006) Sporting and physical activity following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 13(4):296–300PubMedCrossRef Fisher N, Agarwal M, Reuben SF, Johnson DS, Turner PG (2006) Sporting and physical activity following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 13(4):296–300PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hollinghurst D, Stoney J, Ward T et al (2006) No deterioration of kinematics and cruciate function 10 years after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Knee 13(6):440–444PubMedCrossRef Hollinghurst D, Stoney J, Ward T et al (2006) No deterioration of kinematics and cruciate function 10 years after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Knee 13(6):440–444PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hopper GP, Leach WJ (2008) Participation in sporting activities following knee replacement: total versus unicompartmental. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(10):973–979PubMedCrossRef Hopper GP, Leach WJ (2008) Participation in sporting activities following knee replacement: total versus unicompartmental. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(10):973–979PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14PubMed Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14PubMed
10.
go back to reference Jahromi I, Walton NP, Dobson PJ, Lewis PL, Campbell DG (2004) Patient-perceived outcome measures following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with mini-incision. Int Orthop 28(5):286–289PubMedCrossRef Jahromi I, Walton NP, Dobson PJ, Lewis PL, Campbell DG (2004) Patient-perceived outcome measures following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with mini-incision. Int Orthop 28(5):286–289PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kang SN, Smith TO, Sprenger De Rover WB, Walton NP (2011) Pre-operative patellofemoral degenerative changes do not affect the outcome after medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a report from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(4):476–478PubMedCrossRef Kang SN, Smith TO, Sprenger De Rover WB, Walton NP (2011) Pre-operative patellofemoral degenerative changes do not affect the outcome after medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a report from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(4):476–478PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4):494–502PubMedCrossRef Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4):494–502PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lisowski LA, van den Bekerom MP, Pilot P, van Dijk CN, Lisowski AE (2011) Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a minimally invasive surgical procedure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(2):277–284PubMedCrossRef Lisowski LA, van den Bekerom MP, Pilot P, van Dijk CN, Lisowski AE (2011) Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a minimally invasive surgical procedure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(2):277–284PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference McClung CD, Zahiri CA, Higa JK, Amstutz HC, Schmalzried TP (2000) Relationship between body mass index and activity in hip or knee arthroplasty patients. J Orthop Res 18(1):35–39PubMedCrossRef McClung CD, Zahiri CA, Higa JK, Amstutz HC, Schmalzried TP (2000) Relationship between body mass index and activity in hip or knee arthroplasty patients. J Orthop Res 18(1):35–39PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mercier N, Wimsey S, Saragaglia D (2010) Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 34(8):1137–1143PubMedCrossRef Mercier N, Wimsey S, Saragaglia D (2010) Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 34(8):1137–1143PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Muller PE, Pellengahr C, Witt M, Kircher J, Refior HJ, Jansson V (2004) Influence of minimally invasive surgery on implant positioning and the functional outcome for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19(3):296–301PubMedCrossRef Muller PE, Pellengahr C, Witt M, Kircher J, Refior HJ, Jansson V (2004) Influence of minimally invasive surgery on implant positioning and the functional outcome for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19(3):296–301PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Naal FD, Fischer M, Preuss A et al (2007) Return to sports and recreational activity after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med 35(10):1688–1695PubMedCrossRef Naal FD, Fischer M, Preuss A et al (2007) Return to sports and recreational activity after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med 35(10):1688–1695PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Saragaglia D, Estour G, Nemer C, Colle PE (2009) Revision of 33 unicompartmental knee prostheses using total knee arthroplasty: strategy and results. Int Orthop 33(4):969–974PubMedCrossRef Saragaglia D, Estour G, Nemer C, Colle PE (2009) Revision of 33 unicompartmental knee prostheses using total knee arthroplasty: strategy and results. Int Orthop 33(4):969–974PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sperner G, Wanitschek P, Benedetto KP, Glotzer W (1990) Late results in patellar fracture. Aktuelle Traumatol 20(1):24–28PubMed Sperner G, Wanitschek P, Benedetto KP, Glotzer W (1990) Late results in patellar fracture. Aktuelle Traumatol 20(1):24–28PubMed
21.
go back to reference Stukenborg-Colsman C, Wirth CJ, Lazovic D, Wefer A (2001) High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental joint replacement in unicompartmental knee joint osteoarthritis: 7-10-year follow-up prospective randomised study. Knee 8(3):187–194PubMedCrossRef Stukenborg-Colsman C, Wirth CJ, Lazovic D, Wefer A (2001) High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental joint replacement in unicompartmental knee joint osteoarthritis: 7-10-year follow-up prospective randomised study. Knee 8(3):187–194PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Swanson EA, Schmalzried TP, Dorey FJ (2009) Activity recommendations after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a survey of the American Association for Hip and Knee Surgeons. J Arthroplasty 24(6 Suppl):120–126PubMedCrossRef Swanson EA, Schmalzried TP, Dorey FJ (2009) Activity recommendations after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a survey of the American Association for Hip and Knee Surgeons. J Arthroplasty 24(6 Suppl):120–126PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Vorlat P, Putzeys G, Cottenie D et al (2006) The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: an independent 10-year survival analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(1):40–45PubMedCrossRef Vorlat P, Putzeys G, Cottenie D et al (2006) The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: an independent 10-year survival analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(1):40–45PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Walton NP, Jahromi I, Lewis PL, Dobson PJ, Angel KR, Campbell DG (2006) Patient-perceived outcomes and return to sport and work: TKA versus mini-incision unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 19(2):112–116PubMed Walton NP, Jahromi I, Lewis PL, Dobson PJ, Angel KR, Campbell DG (2006) Patient-perceived outcomes and return to sport and work: TKA versus mini-incision unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 19(2):112–116PubMed
25.
go back to reference Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC (1998) Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty 13(8):890–895PubMedCrossRef Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC (1998) Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty 13(8):890–895PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Sports activities after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Oxford III—What can we expect?
Authors
Matthias F. Pietschmann
Lisa Wohlleb
Patrick Weber
Florian Schmidutz
Andreas Ficklscherer
Mehmet F. Gülecyüz
Elem Safi
Thomas R. Niethammer
Volkmar Jansson
Peter E. Müller
Publication date
01-01-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1710-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

International Orthopaedics 1/2013 Go to the issue