Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 8/2011

01-08-2011 | Original Paper

Monoaxial versus polyaxial locking systems: a biomechanical analysis of different locking systems for the fixation of proximal humeral fractures

Authors: Ralph Zettl, Thorben Müller, Tobias Topp, Ulrike Lewan, Antonio Krüger, Christian Kühne, Steffen Ruchholtz

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 8/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The development of locking plate systems has led to polyaxial screws and new plate designs. This study compares monoaxial head locking screws (PHILOS© by Synthes) and a new generation of polyaxial locking screws (NCB-LE© by Zimmer) with respect to biomechanical stability.

Methods

On nine pairs of randomised formalin fixed humerus specimens, standardised osteotomies and osteosyntheses with nine monoaxial (group A) und nine polyaxial (group B) plate/screw systems were performed. A material testing machine by Instron (M-10 14961-DE) was used for cyclic stress tests and crash tests until defined breakup criteria as endpoints were reached.

Results

After axial cyclic stress 200 times at 90 N, plastic deformation was 1.02 mm in group A and 1.25 mm in group B. After the next cycle using 180 N the additional deformation averaged 0.23 mm in group A and 0.39 mm in group B. The deformation using 450 N was 0.72 mm in group A compared to 0.92 mm in group B. The final full power test resulted in a deformation average of 0.49 mm in group A and 0.63 mm in group B after 2,000 cycles using 450 N. When reaching the breakup criteria the plastic deformation of the NCB plate was 9.04 mm on average. The PHILOS plate was similarly deformed by 9.00 mm.
As a result of the crash test, in group A the screws pulled out of the humeral head four times whereas the shaft broke one time and another time the implant was ripped out. The gap was closed four times. In group B, there were three cases of screw cut-through, four shaft fractures/screw avulsions from the shaft and two cases of gap closure.

Conclusion

The two systems resist the cyclic duration tests and the increasing force tests in a similar manner. The considerable clinical benefits of the polyaxial system are enhanced by equal biomechanical performance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Blum J, Hansen M, Rommens P (2009) Die winkelstabile Marknagelung bei Frakturen am proximalen Humerus mit dem PHN (Proximaler Humerusnagel). Oper Orthop Traumatol 21:296–311PubMedCrossRef Blum J, Hansen M, Rommens P (2009) Die winkelstabile Marknagelung bei Frakturen am proximalen Humerus mit dem PHN (Proximaler Humerusnagel). Oper Orthop Traumatol 21:296–311PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Erhardt J, Roderer G, Grob K, Forster T, Stoffel K, Kuster M (2009) Early results in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with a polyaxial locking plate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:1367–1374PubMedCrossRef Erhardt J, Roderer G, Grob K, Forster T, Stoffel K, Kuster M (2009) Early results in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with a polyaxial locking plate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:1367–1374PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hessler C, Schmucker U, Matthes G, Ekkernkamp A, Gütschow R, Eggers C (2006) Ergebnisse nach Versorgung instabiler proximalerHumerusfrakturen mittels winkelstabiler Platte. Unfallchirurg 109:867–874PubMedCrossRef Hessler C, Schmucker U, Matthes G, Ekkernkamp A, Gütschow R, Eggers C (2006) Ergebnisse nach Versorgung instabiler proximalerHumerusfrakturen mittels winkelstabiler Platte. Unfallchirurg 109:867–874PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hessmann M, Rommens P (2001) Osteosynthesetechniken bei proximalen Humerusfrakturen. Chirurg 72:1235–1245PubMedCrossRef Hessmann M, Rommens P (2001) Osteosynthesetechniken bei proximalen Humerusfrakturen. Chirurg 72:1235–1245PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hessmann M, Sternstein W, Mehler D, Korner J, Hofmann A, Rommens P (2004) Sind winkelstabile Plattensysteme mit elastischen Eigenschaften fürdie Stabilisierung der Oberarmkopffraktur vorteilhaft? Biomed Technik 49:345–350CrossRef Hessmann M, Sternstein W, Mehler D, Korner J, Hofmann A, Rommens P (2004) Sind winkelstabile Plattensysteme mit elastischen Eigenschaften fürdie Stabilisierung der Oberarmkopffraktur vorteilhaft? Biomed Technik 49:345–350CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hessmann M, Sternstein W, Krummenauer F, Hofmann A, Rommens P (2004) Osteosynthese von Oberarmkopffrakturen—Einfluss desImplantatdesigns auf die biomechanische Stabilität. Chirurg 75:167–174 Hessmann M, Sternstein W, Krummenauer F, Hofmann A, Rommens P (2004) Osteosynthese von Oberarmkopffrakturen—Einfluss desImplantatdesigns auf die biomechanische Stabilität. Chirurg 75:167–174
7.
go back to reference Kettler M, Braunstein V, Biberthaler P, Krammer M, Mutschler W (2007) Komplikationen winkelstabiler Plattenosteosynthesen am Humeruskopf—Darstellung und Management. Trauma Berufskrankh 9:48–53CrossRef Kettler M, Braunstein V, Biberthaler P, Krammer M, Mutschler W (2007) Komplikationen winkelstabiler Plattenosteosynthesen am Humeruskopf—Darstellung und Management. Trauma Berufskrankh 9:48–53CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lever J, Aksenov S, Zdero R, Ahn H, McKee M, Schemtisch E (2008) Biomechanical analysis of plate osteosynthesis systems for proxima humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 22:23–29PubMedCrossRef Lever J, Aksenov S, Zdero R, Ahn H, McKee M, Schemtisch E (2008) Biomechanical analysis of plate osteosynthesis systems for proxima humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 22:23–29PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lill H, Josten C (2001) Konservative oder operative Versorgung derHumeruskopffraktur beim alten Menschen? Chirurg 72:1224–1234PubMedCrossRef Lill H, Josten C (2001) Konservative oder operative Versorgung derHumeruskopffraktur beim alten Menschen? Chirurg 72:1224–1234PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lohmann R, Haid K, Stöckle U, Raschke M (2007) Epidemiologie und Perspektiven der Alterstraumatologie. Unfallchirurg 110:553–562PubMedCrossRef Lohmann R, Haid K, Stöckle U, Raschke M (2007) Epidemiologie und Perspektiven der Alterstraumatologie. Unfallchirurg 110:553–562PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Maurer J, Rüter A (2004) Winkelstabile Plattenosteosynthese amproximalen Humerus—Ein klinischer Vergleich von etablierten und neuenVerfahren. Trauma Berufskrankh 6:247–250CrossRef Maurer J, Rüter A (2004) Winkelstabile Plattenosteosynthese amproximalen Humerus—Ein klinischer Vergleich von etablierten und neuenVerfahren. Trauma Berufskrankh 6:247–250CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Röderer G, Gebhartd F, Erhardt J, Al-Agha S, AbouElsoud M, Kinzl L (2007) Die non-contact-bridging(NCB)-Platte. Unfallchirurg 110:505–512PubMedCrossRef Röderer G, Gebhartd F, Erhardt J, Al-Agha S, AbouElsoud M, Kinzl L (2007) Die non-contact-bridging(NCB)-Platte. Unfallchirurg 110:505–512PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Röderer G, AbouElsoud M, Gebhard F, Claes L, Aschoff A, Kinzl L (2010) Biomechanische Untersuchungen der winkelstabilen Plattenosteosyntheseam proximalen Humerus. Unfallchirurg 113:133–138PubMedCrossRef Röderer G, AbouElsoud M, Gebhard F, Claes L, Aschoff A, Kinzl L (2010) Biomechanische Untersuchungen der winkelstabilen Plattenosteosyntheseam proximalen Humerus. Unfallchirurg 113:133–138PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Strohm P, Köstler W, Südkamp N (2008) Proximale Humerusfrakturen—was sollen wir tun? Z Orthop Unfall 146:312–317PubMedCrossRef Strohm P, Köstler W, Südkamp N (2008) Proximale Humerusfrakturen—was sollen wir tun? Z Orthop Unfall 146:312–317PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Südkamp N (2004) Erste Erfahrungen mit winkelstabilen Implantaten –obere Extremität: subcapitale Humerusfrakturen. Trauma Berufskrankh 6:13–18CrossRef Südkamp N (2004) Erste Erfahrungen mit winkelstabilen Implantaten –obere Extremität: subcapitale Humerusfrakturen. Trauma Berufskrankh 6:13–18CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Südkamp N, Bayer J, Hepp P, Voigt C, Oestern H, Kääb M, Luo C, Plecko M, Wendt K, Köstler W, Konrad G (2009) Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1320–1328PubMedCrossRef Südkamp N, Bayer J, Hepp P, Voigt C, Oestern H, Kääb M, Luo C, Plecko M, Wendt K, Köstler W, Konrad G (2009) Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1320–1328PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Virkus W, Goldberg S, Lorenz E (2008) A comparison of compressive force generation by plating and intramedullary nailing techniques in a transverse diaphysial humerus fracture model. J Trauma 65:103–108PubMedCrossRef Virkus W, Goldberg S, Lorenz E (2008) A comparison of compressive force generation by plating and intramedullary nailing techniques in a transverse diaphysial humerus fracture model. J Trauma 65:103–108PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Voigt C, Woltmann A, Lill H (2007) Komplikationsmanagement nach winkelstabiler Plattenosteosynthese am proximalen Humerus. Chirurg 78:40–46PubMedCrossRef Voigt C, Woltmann A, Lill H (2007) Komplikationsmanagement nach winkelstabiler Plattenosteosynthese am proximalen Humerus. Chirurg 78:40–46PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Voigt C, Lill H (2007) Versorgung proximaler Humerusfrakturen—Fortschritte in der Plattenosteosynthese. Trauma Berufskrankh 9:43–47CrossRef Voigt C, Lill H (2007) Versorgung proximaler Humerusfrakturen—Fortschritte in der Plattenosteosynthese. Trauma Berufskrankh 9:43–47CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wilkens K, Curtiss S, Lee M (2008) Polyaxial locking plate fixation in distal femur fractures: a biomechanical comparison. J Orthop Trauma 22:624–628PubMedCrossRef Wilkens K, Curtiss S, Lee M (2008) Polyaxial locking plate fixation in distal femur fractures: a biomechanical comparison. J Orthop Trauma 22:624–628PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wingerter S, Calvert G, Tucci M, Benghuzzi H, Russel G, Puckett A (2006) Mechanical strength repercussions of various fixative storage methods on bone. Biomed Sci Instrum 42:290–295PubMed Wingerter S, Calvert G, Tucci M, Benghuzzi H, Russel G, Puckett A (2006) Mechanical strength repercussions of various fixative storage methods on bone. Biomed Sci Instrum 42:290–295PubMed
22.
go back to reference Zech S, Goesling T, Hankemeier S, Knobloch K, Geerling J, Schultz-Brunn K, Krettek C, Richter M (2006) Differences in the mechanical properties of calcaneal artificial specimens, fresh frozen specimens and embalmed specimens differ in experimental testing. Foot Ankle Int 27(12):1126–1136PubMed Zech S, Goesling T, Hankemeier S, Knobloch K, Geerling J, Schultz-Brunn K, Krettek C, Richter M (2006) Differences in the mechanical properties of calcaneal artificial specimens, fresh frozen specimens and embalmed specimens differ in experimental testing. Foot Ankle Int 27(12):1126–1136PubMed
Metadata
Title
Monoaxial versus polyaxial locking systems: a biomechanical analysis of different locking systems for the fixation of proximal humeral fractures
Authors
Ralph Zettl
Thorben Müller
Tobias Topp
Ulrike Lewan
Antonio Krüger
Christian Kühne
Steffen Ruchholtz
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 8/2011
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1220-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2011

International Orthopaedics 8/2011 Go to the issue