Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Orthopaedics
Published in: International Orthopaedics 2/2011

01-02-2011 | Letter to the Editor

Comments on Smith et al.: Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes

Author: Riaz J. K. Khan

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Excerpt

Dear Editor, …
Literature
1.
Smith TO, Blake V, Hing CB (2010) Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. Int Orthop. doi:10.​1007/​s00264-010-1075-8
2.
Bennett D, Ogonda L, Elliott D, Humphreys L, Lawlor M, Beverland D (2007) Comparison of immediate postoperative walking ability in patients receiving minimally invasive and standard-incision hip arthroplasty: a prospective blinded study. J Arthroplasty 22:490–495CrossRefPubMed
3.
Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, Lawlor M, Humphreys P, O'Brien S et al (2005) A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87-A:701–710CrossRef
4.
Sculco TP, Jordan LC, Walter WL (2004) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: the Hospital for Special Surgery experience. Orthop Clin North Am 35:137–142CrossRefPubMed
5.
Chimento GF, Pavone V, Sharrock N, Kahn B, Cahill J, Sculco T (2005) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 20:139–144CrossRefPubMed
6.
Egger M, Smith GD, Sterne JA (2001) Uses and abuses of meta-analysis. Clin Med 1:478–484PubMed
Metadata
Title
Comments on Smith et al.: Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes
Author
Riaz J. K. Khan
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1170-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

International Orthopaedics 2/2011 Go to the issue

Original Paper

The dual mobility socket concept: experience with 668 cases

Original Paper

Distal locking stem for revision femoral loosening and peri-prosthetic fractures

Acknowledgement to Referees

Acknowledgement to Referees

Review

Revision total hip arthroplasty: the femoral side using cemented implants

Review

Vitamin E diffused, highly crosslinked UHMWPE: a review

Original Paper

Excellent results with cementless total hip arthroplasty and alumina-on-alumina pairing: minimum ten-year follow-up