Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 10/2011

01-10-2011 | Original Paper

Surgery for pathological proximal femoral fractures, excluding femoral head and neck fractures

Resection vs. stabilisation

Authors: Max Zacherl, Gerald Gruber, Mathias Glehr, Petra Ofner-Kopeinig, Roman Radl, Manfred Greitbauer, Vilmos Vecsei, Reinhard Windhager

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 10/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Pathological femoral head and neck fractures are commonly treated by arthroplasty. Treatment options for the trochanteric region or below are not clearly defined. The purpose of this retrospective, comparative, double-centre study was to analyse survival and influences on outcome according to the surgical technique used to treat pathological proximal femoral fractures, excluding fractures of the femoral head and neck. Fifty-nine patients with 64 fractures were operated up on between 1998 and 2004 in two tertiary referral centres and divided into two groups. One group (S, n = 33) consisted of patients who underwent intramedullary nailing alone, and the other group (R, n = 31) consisted of patients treated by metastatic tissue resection and reconstruction by means of different implants. Median survival was 12.6 months with no difference between groups. Surgical complications were higher in the R group (n = 7) vs. the S group (n = 3), with no statistically significant difference. Patients with surgery-related complications had a higher survival rate (p = 0.049), as did patients with mechanical implant failure (p = 0.01). Survival scoring systems did not correlate with actual survival. Resection of metastases in patients with pathological fractures of the proximal femur, excluding femoral head and neck fractures, has no influence on survival. Patients with long postoperative survival prognosis are at risk of implant-related complications.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Bauer HC, Wedin R (1995) Survival after surgery for spinal and extremity metastases. Prognostication in 241 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 66(2):143–146PubMedCrossRef Bauer HC, Wedin R (1995) Survival after surgery for spinal and extremity metastases. Prognostication in 241 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 66(2):143–146PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Clarke HD, Damron TA, Sim FH (1998) Head and neck replacement endoprosthesis for pathologic proximal femoral lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 353:210–217PubMedCrossRef Clarke HD, Damron TA, Sim FH (1998) Head and neck replacement endoprosthesis for pathologic proximal femoral lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 353:210–217PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Capanna R, Campanacci DA (2001) The treatment of metastases in the appendicular skeleton. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(4):471–481PubMedCrossRef Capanna R, Campanacci DA (2001) The treatment of metastases in the appendicular skeleton. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(4):471–481PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA (1980) A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 153:106–120PubMed Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA (1980) A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 153:106–120PubMed
10.
go back to reference Perez CA, Bradfield JS, Morgan HC (1972) Management of pathologic fractures. Cancer 29(3):684–693PubMedCrossRef Perez CA, Bradfield JS, Morgan HC (1972) Management of pathologic fractures. Cancer 29(3):684–693PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5(6):649–655PubMedCrossRef Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5(6):649–655PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tomita K, Kawahara N, Kobayashi T, Yoshida A, Murakami H, Akamaru T (2001) Surgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine 26(3):298–306PubMedCrossRef Tomita K, Kawahara N, Kobayashi T, Yoshida A, Murakami H, Akamaru T (2001) Surgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine 26(3):298–306PubMedCrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Windhager R, Ritschl P, Rokus U, Kickinger W, Braun O, Kotz R (1989) The incidence of recurrence of intra- and extra-lesional operated metastases of long tubular bones. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 127(4):402–405PubMedCrossRef Windhager R, Ritschl P, Rokus U, Kickinger W, Braun O, Kotz R (1989) The incidence of recurrence of intra- and extra-lesional operated metastases of long tubular bones. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 127(4):402–405PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Moradi B, Zahlten-Hinguranage A, Lehner B, Zeifang F (2010) The impact of pathological fractures on therapy outcome in patients with primary malignant bone tumours. Int Orthop 34(7):1017–1023PubMedCrossRef Moradi B, Zahlten-Hinguranage A, Lehner B, Zeifang F (2010) The impact of pathological fractures on therapy outcome in patients with primary malignant bone tumours. Int Orthop 34(7):1017–1023PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cole AS, Hill GA, Theologis TN, Gibbons CL, Willett K (2000) Femoral nailing for metastatic disease of the femur: a comparison of reamed and unreamed femoral nailing. Injury 31(1):25–31. doi:S0020-1383(99)00195-3 PubMedCrossRef Cole AS, Hill GA, Theologis TN, Gibbons CL, Willett K (2000) Femoral nailing for metastatic disease of the femur: a comparison of reamed and unreamed femoral nailing. Injury 31(1):25–31. doi:S0020-1383(99)00195-3 PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kinkel S, Stecher J, Gotterbarm T, Bruckner T, Holz U (2009) Compound osteosynthesis for osteolyses and pathological fractures of the proximal femur. Orthopedics 32(6):403PubMedCrossRef Kinkel S, Stecher J, Gotterbarm T, Bruckner T, Holz U (2009) Compound osteosynthesis for osteolyses and pathological fractures of the proximal femur. Orthopedics 32(6):403PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Schneiderbauer MM, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS, Sim FH, Scully SP (2004) Patient survival after hip arthroplasty for metastatic disease of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(8):1684–1689. doi:86/8/1684 PubMed Schneiderbauer MM, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS, Sim FH, Scully SP (2004) Patient survival after hip arthroplasty for metastatic disease of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(8):1684–1689. doi:86/​8/​1684 PubMed
20.
go back to reference Chandrasekar CR, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM, Abudu AT (2008) Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur. J Orthop Surg Res 3:50PubMedCrossRef Chandrasekar CR, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM, Abudu AT (2008) Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur. J Orthop Surg Res 3:50PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hattori H, Mibe J, Matsuoka H, Nagai S, Yamamoto K (2007) Surgical management of metastatic disease of the proximal femur. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 15(3):295–298 Hattori H, Mibe J, Matsuoka H, Nagai S, Yamamoto K (2007) Surgical management of metastatic disease of the proximal femur. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 15(3):295–298
22.
go back to reference Leithner A, Radl R, Gruber G, Hochegger M, Leithner K, Welkerling H, Rehak P, Windhager R (2008) Predictive value of seven preoperative prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases. Eur Spine J 17(11):1488–1495. doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0763-1 PubMedCrossRef Leithner A, Radl R, Gruber G, Hochegger M, Leithner K, Welkerling H, Rehak P, Windhager R (2008) Predictive value of seven preoperative prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases. Eur Spine J 17(11):1488–1495. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-008-0763-1 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Surgery for pathological proximal femoral fractures, excluding femoral head and neck fractures
Resection vs. stabilisation
Authors
Max Zacherl
Gerald Gruber
Mathias Glehr
Petra Ofner-Kopeinig
Roman Radl
Manfred Greitbauer
Vilmos Vecsei
Reinhard Windhager
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 10/2011
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1160-z

Other articles of this Issue 10/2011

International Orthopaedics 10/2011 Go to the issue