Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 2/2009

01-04-2009 | Review

Diagnosing displaced four-part fractures of the proximal humerus: a review of observer studies

Authors: Stig Brorson, Jens Bagger, Annette Sylvest, Asbjørn Hrobjartsson

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 2/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Displaced four-part fractures comprise 2–10 % of all proximal humeral fractures. The optimal treatment is unclear and randomised trials are needed. The conduct and interpretation of such trials is facilitated by a reproducible fracture classification. We aimed at quantifying observer agreement on the classification of displaced four-part fractures according to the Neer system. Published and unpublished data from five observer studies were reviewed. Observers agreed less on displaced four-part fractures than on the overall Neer classification. Mean kappa values for interobserver agreement ranged from 0.16 to 0.48. Specialists agreed slightly more than fellows and residents. Advanced imaging modalities (CT and 3D CT) seemed to contribute more to classification of displaced four-part patterns than in less complex fracture patterns. Low observer agreement may challenge the clinical approach to displaced four-part fractures and poses a problem for the interpretation and generalisation of results from future randomised trials.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bengner U, Johnell O, Redlund-Johnell I (1988) Changes in the incidence of fracture of the upper end of the humerus during a 30-year period. A study of 2125 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 231:179–182PubMed Bengner U, Johnell O, Redlund-Johnell I (1988) Changes in the incidence of fracture of the upper end of the humerus during a 30-year period. A study of 2125 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 231:179–182PubMed
2.
go back to reference Palvanen M, Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J (2006) Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:87–92PubMedCrossRef Palvanen M, Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J (2006) Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:87–92PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM (2001) The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 72:365–371PubMedCrossRef Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM (2001) The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 72:365–371PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Murray D, Zuckerman JD (2005) Four-part fractures and fracture-dislocations. In: Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ (eds) Shoulder fractures. The practical guide to management. Thieme, New York, pp 295–298 Murray D, Zuckerman JD (2005) Four-part fractures and fracture-dislocations. In: Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ (eds) Shoulder fractures. The practical guide to management. Thieme, New York, pp 295–298
5.
go back to reference Lee EW, Flatow EL (2005) Arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures, nonunions, and malunions. In: Bigliani LU, Flatow EL (eds) Shoulder arthroplasty. Springer, New York, pp 86–116CrossRef Lee EW, Flatow EL (2005) Arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures, nonunions, and malunions. In: Bigliani LU, Flatow EL (eds) Shoulder arthroplasty. Springer, New York, pp 86–116CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Williams GR, Yamaguchi K, Ramsey ML, Galatz LM (2005) Shoulder and elbow arthroplasty. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia Williams GR, Yamaguchi K, Ramsey ML, Galatz LM (2005) Shoulder and elbow arthroplasty. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
7.
go back to reference Neer CS (1955) Articular replacement for the humeral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 37A:215–228 Neer CS (1955) Articular replacement for the humeral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 37A:215–228
8.
go back to reference Holbein O, Bauer G, Hoellen IP, Keppler P, Hehl G, Kinzl L (1999) Is primary endoprosthetic replacement of the humeral head an alternative treatment for comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients? Osteosynthese International 7:207–210 Holbein O, Bauer G, Hoellen IP, Keppler P, Hehl G, Kinzl L (1999) Is primary endoprosthetic replacement of the humeral head an alternative treatment for comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients? Osteosynthese International 7:207–210
9.
go back to reference Kristiansen B, Kofoed H (1988) Transcutaneous reduction and external fixation of displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. A controlled clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:821–824PubMed Kristiansen B, Kofoed H (1988) Transcutaneous reduction and external fixation of displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. A controlled clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:821–824PubMed
10.
go back to reference Stableforth PG (1984) Four-part fractures of the neck of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:104–108PubMed Stableforth PG (1984) Four-part fractures of the neck of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:104–108PubMed
11.
go back to reference Zyto K, Ahrengart L, Sperber A, Tornkvist H (1997) Treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:412–417PubMedCrossRef Zyto K, Ahrengart L, Sperber A, Tornkvist H (1997) Treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:412–417PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bhandari M, Matthys G, McKee MD (2004) Four part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Orthop Trauma 18:126–127PubMedCrossRef Bhandari M, Matthys G, McKee MD (2004) Four part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Orthop Trauma 18:126–127PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Handoll HHG, Madhok R (2001) Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1:CD000434 Handoll HHG, Madhok R (2001) Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1:CD000434
14.
go back to reference Misra A, Kapur R, Maffulli N (2001) Complex proximal humeral fractures in adults-a systematic review of management. Injury 32:363–372PubMedCrossRef Misra A, Kapur R, Maffulli N (2001) Complex proximal humeral fractures in adults-a systematic review of management. Injury 32:363–372PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tingart M, Bathis H, Bouillon B, Tiling T (2001) The displaced proximal humeral fracture: is there evidence for therapeutic concepts? Chirurg 72:1284–1291PubMedCrossRef Tingart M, Bathis H, Bouillon B, Tiling T (2001) The displaced proximal humeral fracture: is there evidence for therapeutic concepts? Chirurg 72:1284–1291PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Brorson S, Hrobjartsson A (2008) Training improves agreement among doctors using the Neer system for proximal humeral fractures in a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 61:7–16PubMedCrossRef Brorson S, Hrobjartsson A (2008) Training improves agreement among doctors using the Neer system for proximal humeral fractures in a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 61:7–16PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gjorup T (1988) The kappa coefficient and the prevalence of a diagnosis. Methods Inf Med 27:184–186PubMed Gjorup T (1988) The kappa coefficient and the prevalence of a diagnosis. Methods Inf Med 27:184–186PubMed
18.
go back to reference Svanholm H, Starklint H, Gundersen HJ, Fabricius J, Barlebo H, Olsen S (1989) Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnoses with special reference to the kappa statistic. APMIS 97:689–698PubMed Svanholm H, Starklint H, Gundersen HJ, Fabricius J, Barlebo H, Olsen S (1989) Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnoses with special reference to the kappa statistic. APMIS 97:689–698PubMed
19.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Brien H, Noftall F, MacMaster S, Cummings T, Landells C, Rockwood P (1995) Neer's classification system: a critical appraisal. J Trauma 38:257–260PubMedCrossRef Brien H, Noftall F, MacMaster S, Cummings T, Landells C, Rockwood P (1995) Neer's classification system: a critical appraisal. J Trauma 38:257–260PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Brorson S, Bagger J, Sylvest A, Hrobjartsson A (2002) Low agreement among 24 doctors using the Neer-classification; only moderate agreement on displacement, even between specialists. Int Orthop 26:271–273PubMedCrossRef Brorson S, Bagger J, Sylvest A, Hrobjartsson A (2002) Low agreement among 24 doctors using the Neer-classification; only moderate agreement on displacement, even between specialists. Int Orthop 26:271–273PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Brorson S, Bagger J, Sylvest A, Hrobjartsson A (2002) Improved interobserver variation after training of doctors in the Neer system. A randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:950–954PubMedCrossRef Brorson S, Bagger J, Sylvest A, Hrobjartsson A (2002) Improved interobserver variation after training of doctors in the Neer system. A randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:950–954PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sjöden GO, Movin T, Guntner P, Aspelin P, Ahrengart L, Ersmark H et al (1997) Poor reproducibility of classification of proximal humeral fractures. Additional CT of minor value. Acta Orthop Scand 68:239–242PubMedCrossRef Sjöden GO, Movin T, Guntner P, Aspelin P, Ahrengart L, Ersmark H et al (1997) Poor reproducibility of classification of proximal humeral fractures. Additional CT of minor value. Acta Orthop Scand 68:239–242PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sjöden GO, Movin T, Aspelin P, Guntner P, Shalabi A (1999) 3D-radiographic analysis does not improve the Neer and AO classifications of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 70:325–328PubMed Sjöden GO, Movin T, Aspelin P, Guntner P, Shalabi A (1999) 3D-radiographic analysis does not improve the Neer and AO classifications of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 70:325–328PubMed
25.
go back to reference Neer CS (2002) Four-segment classification of proximal humeral fractures: purpose and reliable use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:389–400PubMedCrossRef Neer CS (2002) Four-segment classification of proximal humeral fractures: purpose and reliable use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:389–400PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Trupka A, Wiedemann E, Ruchholtz S, Brunner U, Habermeyer P, Schweiberer L (1997) Dislocated multiple fragment fractures of the head of the humerus. Does dislocation of the humeral head fragment signify a worse prognosis? Unfallchirurg 100:105–110PubMedCrossRef Trupka A, Wiedemann E, Ruchholtz S, Brunner U, Habermeyer P, Schweiberer L (1997) Dislocated multiple fragment fractures of the head of the humerus. Does dislocation of the humeral head fragment signify a worse prognosis? Unfallchirurg 100:105–110PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Habermeyer P, Schweiberer L (1989) Fractures of the proximal humerus. Orthopade 18:200–207PubMed Habermeyer P, Schweiberer L (1989) Fractures of the proximal humerus. Orthopade 18:200–207PubMed
Metadata
Title
Diagnosing displaced four-part fractures of the proximal humerus: a review of observer studies
Authors
Stig Brorson
Jens Bagger
Annette Sylvest
Asbjørn Hrobjartsson
Publication date
01-04-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 2/2009
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0591-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2009

International Orthopaedics 2/2009 Go to the issue