Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 5/2007

01-10-2007 | Original Paper

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture

Authors: T. W. Lau, F. Leung, C. F. Chan, S. P. Chow

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 5/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

The management of fractures of the proximal shaft of the humerus has been evolving since the development of new techniques and new implants in recent years. It seems that this kind of fracture has an increasing incidence in the older, osteoporotic population. In the last 2 years, we have operated on 17 patients, with an average age of 65, who had proximal humeral shaft fractures treated by minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique using the metaphyseal locking compression plate. Our study evaluated the surgical technique used and the outcome for these patients with regards to their range of movement and shoulder function. Our results showed that all the patients could achieve at least 140º of shoulder abduction in the first 6 months after the operation, except for three patients who had shoulder impingement. These patients had an average Constant score of 76.8. All fractures had bony union at 6 months, except one, which was probably due to poor reduction in the initial operation. Another complication that we encountered was radial nerve neuropraxia. The ways to prevent these complications are discussed. In conclusion, MIPO fixation using the metaphyseal locking compression plate is a good option for the management of proximal humeral shaft fractures. It provides early functional recovery, but we had to pay special attention to some of the surgical details in order to minimise complications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ajmal M, O’Sullivan M, McCabe J, Curtin W (2001) Antegrade locked intramedullary nailing in humeral shaft fractures. Injury 32(9):692–694PubMedCrossRef Ajmal M, O’Sullivan M, McCabe J, Curtin W (2001) Antegrade locked intramedullary nailing in humeral shaft fractures. Injury 32(9):692–694PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Apivathakakul T, Arpornchayanon O, Bavornratanavech S (2005) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of the humeral shaft fracture. Is it possible? A cadaveric study and preliminary report. Injury 36:530–538CrossRef Apivathakakul T, Arpornchayanon O, Bavornratanavech S (2005) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of the humeral shaft fracture. Is it possible? A cadaveric study and preliminary report. Injury 36:530–538CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chao TC, Chou WY, Chung JC, Hsu CJ (2005) Humeral shaft fractures treated by dynamic compression plates, Ender nails and interlocking nails. Int Orthop 29(2):88–91PubMedCrossRef Chao TC, Chou WY, Chung JC, Hsu CJ (2005) Humeral shaft fractures treated by dynamic compression plates, Ender nails and interlocking nails. Int Orthop 29(2):88–91PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Crates J, Whittle AP (1998) Antegrade interlocking nailing of acute humeral shaft fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 350:40–50PubMedCrossRef Crates J, Whittle AP (1998) Antegrade interlocking nailing of acute humeral shaft fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 350:40–50PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fernandez Dell’Oca AA (2002) The principle of helical implants. Unusual ideas worth considering. Injury 33(Suppl 1):SA1–SA27PubMed Fernandez Dell’Oca AA (2002) The principle of helical implants. Unusual ideas worth considering. Injury 33(Suppl 1):SA1–SA27PubMed
7.
go back to reference Gardner MJ, Griffith MH, Lorich DG (2005) Helical plating of the proximal humerus. Injury 36:1197–1200PubMedCrossRef Gardner MJ, Griffith MH, Lorich DG (2005) Helical plating of the proximal humerus. Injury 36:1197–1200PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Helfet DL, Shonnard PY, Levine D, Borrelli J Jr (1997) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of distal fractures of the tibia. Injury 28(Suppl 1):42–48CrossRef Helfet DL, Shonnard PY, Levine D, Borrelli J Jr (1997) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of distal fractures of the tibia. Injury 28(Suppl 1):42–48CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hunter SG (1982) The closed treatment of fractures of the humeral shaft. Clin Orthop 164:192–198PubMed Hunter SG (1982) The closed treatment of fractures of the humeral shaft. Clin Orthop 164:192–198PubMed
10.
go back to reference Koch PP, Gross DF, Gerber C (2002) The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11(2):143–150PubMedCrossRef Koch PP, Gross DF, Gerber C (2002) The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11(2):143–150PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Krettek C, Gerich T, Miclau T (2001) A minimally invasive medial approach for proximal tibia fractures. Injury 32(Suppl 1):SA4–SA13PubMed Krettek C, Gerich T, Miclau T (2001) A minimally invasive medial approach for proximal tibia fractures. Injury 32(Suppl 1):SA4–SA13PubMed
12.
go back to reference Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Miclau T, Tscherne H (1997) Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) using the DCS in the proximal and distal femoral fractures. Injury 28(Suppl 1):A20–A30PubMedCrossRef Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Miclau T, Tscherne H (1997) Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) using the DCS in the proximal and distal femoral fractures. Injury 28(Suppl 1):A20–A30PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lin J, Hou SM (1999) Antegrade locked nailing for humeral shaft fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 365:201–210PubMedCrossRef Lin J, Hou SM (1999) Antegrade locked nailing for humeral shaft fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 365:201–210PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Livani B, Belangero WD (2004) Bridge plate osteoynsthesis of humeral shaft fractures. Injury 35:587–595PubMedCrossRef Livani B, Belangero WD (2004) Bridge plate osteoynsthesis of humeral shaft fractures. Injury 35:587–595PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nguyen TV, Center JR, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA (2001) Risk factors for proximal humerus, forearm, and wrist fractures in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. Am J Epidemiol 153:587–595PubMedCrossRef Nguyen TV, Center JR, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA (2001) Risk factors for proximal humerus, forearm, and wrist fractures in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. Am J Epidemiol 153:587–595PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Petsatodes G, Karataglis D, Papadopoulos P, Christoforides J, Gigis J, Pournaras J (2004) Antegrade interlocking nailing of humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Sci 9(3):247–252PubMedCrossRef Petsatodes G, Karataglis D, Papadopoulos P, Christoforides J, Gigis J, Pournaras J (2004) Antegrade interlocking nailing of humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Sci 9(3):247–252PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ruedi T, Moshfegh A, Pfeiffer KM, Allgower M (1974) Fresh fractures of the shaft of the humerus. Conservative or operative treatment? Reconstr Surg Traumatol 14:65–74PubMed Ruedi T, Moshfegh A, Pfeiffer KM, Allgower M (1974) Fresh fractures of the shaft of the humerus. Conservative or operative treatment? Reconstr Surg Traumatol 14:65–74PubMed
18.
go back to reference Sarmiento A, Kinman PB, Galvin EG, Schmitt RH, Phillips JG (1977) Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59(5):596–601PubMed Sarmiento A, Kinman PB, Galvin EG, Schmitt RH, Phillips JG (1977) Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59(5):596–601PubMed
Metadata
Title
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture
Authors
T. W. Lau
F. Leung
C. F. Chan
S. P. Chow
Publication date
01-10-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 5/2007
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0242-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2007

International Orthopaedics 5/2007 Go to the issue