Skip to main content
Top
Literature
1.
go back to reference Audigé L, Hanson B, Swiontkowski MF (2003) Implant-related complications in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: Meta-analysis of dynamic screw-plate versus dynamic screw-intramedullary nail devices. Int Orthop 27:197–203CrossRefPubMed Audigé L, Hanson B, Swiontkowski MF (2003) Implant-related complications in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: Meta-analysis of dynamic screw-plate versus dynamic screw-intramedullary nail devices. Int Orthop 27:197–203CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Egger M, Davey Smith G (1998) Meta-analysis. Bias in location and selection of studies. BMJ 316:61–66PubMed Egger M, Davey Smith G (1998) Meta-analysis. Bias in location and selection of studies. BMJ 316:61–66PubMed
3.
go back to reference Oxman AD, Guyatt GH (1992) A consumer’s guide to subgroup analyses. Ann Intern Med 116:78–84PubMed Oxman AD, Guyatt GH (1992) A consumer’s guide to subgroup analyses. Ann Intern Med 116:78–84PubMed
4.
go back to reference Parker MJ, Handoll HH (2003) Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, Wiley: Chichester Parker MJ, Handoll HH (2003) Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, Wiley: Chichester
Metadata
Title
Letter to the Editor
Authors
Helen Handoll
Martyn Parker
Publication date
01-02-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 1/2004
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-003-0528-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2004

International Orthopaedics 1/2004 Go to the issue