Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 5/2003

01-10-2003 | Review Article

The International Documentation and Evaluation System (IDES)—10-years experience

Authors: C. Röder, S. Eggli, A. EL-Kerdi, U. Müller, T. Ambrose, E. Röösli, A. Busato, M. Aebi

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 5/2003

Login to get access

Excerpt

In 1993 Sir Dennis Paterson wrote an editorial on the International Documentation and Evaluation System (IDES) [9]. He outlined the principles of IDES as consensus, hierarchical information, radiographic evaluation and acceptability. IDES was established by the International Society of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (SICOT) Standing Committee on Documentation and Evaluation, which was founded in 1990 with Prof. M.E. Müller as chairman, and presented at the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) 61st annual meeting in 1994. The nomenclature used on the three IDES sheets for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), revision THA and followup is based on the consensus paper by the Hip Society, the SICOT Commission on Documentation and Evaluation and the Task Force on Outcome Studies of the AAOS [6]. This consensus paper provided a terminology named CART (Clinical and Radiographic Terminology), in which each term, whether applying to a functional or radiographic parameter, was specifically defined to have a constant meaning. The initial impulse to create such a terminology was already given in 1985 when J. Galante [4] called for a uniform method of evaluating and reporting the results of hip-replacement surgery in order to compare the results on a common standardized basis. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ahnfelt L, Herberts P, Malchau H, Andersson GB (1990) Prognosis of total hip replacement. A Swedish multicenter study of 4,664 revisions. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 238:1–26 Ahnfelt L, Herberts P, Malchau H, Andersson GB (1990) Prognosis of total hip replacement. A Swedish multicenter study of 4,664 revisions. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 238:1–26
2.
go back to reference Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840PubMed Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bourne RB (1999) The planning and implementation of the Canadian Joint Replacement Registry. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 58:128–132PubMed Bourne RB (1999) The planning and implementation of the Canadian Joint Replacement Registry. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 58:128–132PubMed
4.
go back to reference Galante J (1985) The need for a standardized system for evaluating results of total hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 67:511–512 Galante J (1985) The need for a standardized system for evaluating results of total hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 67:511–512
5.
go back to reference Havelin LI (1999) The Norwegian Joint Registry. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 58:139–147PubMed Havelin LI (1999) The Norwegian Joint Registry. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 58:139–147PubMed
6.
go back to reference Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH, Harris WH, Poss R, Muller ME, et al (1990) Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72:161–168 Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH, Harris WH, Poss R, Muller ME, et al (1990) Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72:161–168
7.
go back to reference Malchau H, Herberts P, Söderman P, Odén A (2000) Prognosis of total hip replacement. Update and validation of results from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Registry 1979–1998. Department of Orthopaedics, Göteborg University, Sweden 1–16 Malchau H, Herberts P, Söderman P, Odén A (2000) Prognosis of total hip replacement. Update and validation of results from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Registry 1979–1998. Department of Orthopaedics, Göteborg University, Sweden 1–16
8.
go back to reference Müller U, Gautier E, Röder C, Busato A (2003) Influence of cup design on radiographic signs of aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 83:31–36 Müller U, Gautier E, Röder C, Busato A (2003) Influence of cup design on radiographic signs of aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 83:31–36
9.
go back to reference Paterson D (1993) The International Documentation and Evaluation System (IDES). Int Orthop 16:11–14 Paterson D (1993) The International Documentation and Evaluation System (IDES). Int Orthop 16:11–14
10.
11.
go back to reference Röder C, Eggli S, Aebi M, Busato A (2003) The validity of clinical examination in diagnosing component loosening in THA. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 85:37–44 Röder C, Eggli S, Aebi M, Busato A (2003) The validity of clinical examination in diagnosing component loosening in THA. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 85:37–44
12.
go back to reference Rothwell AG (1999) Development of the New Zealand Joint Register. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 58:148–160PubMed Rothwell AG (1999) Development of the New Zealand Joint Register. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 58:148–160PubMed
13.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483PubMed Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483PubMed
Metadata
Title
The International Documentation and Evaluation System (IDES)—10-years experience
Authors
C. Röder
S. Eggli
A. EL-Kerdi
U. Müller
T. Ambrose
E. Röösli
A. Busato
M. Aebi
Publication date
01-10-2003
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 5/2003
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-003-0498-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2003

International Orthopaedics 5/2003 Go to the issue