Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 9/2010

Open Access 01-09-2010 | Focussed Research Review

Modeling flow cytometry data for cancer vaccine immune monitoring

Authors: Jacob Frelinger, Janet Ottinger, Cécile Gouttefangeas, Cliburn Chan

Published in: Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy | Issue 9/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Flow cytometry (FCM) is widely used in cancer research for diagnosis, detection of minimal residual disease, as well as immune monitoring and profiling following immunotherapy. In all these applications, the challenge is to detect extremely rare cell subsets while avoiding spurious positive events. To achieve this objective, it helps to be able to analyze FCM data using multiple markers simultaneously, since the additional information provided often helps to minimize the number of false positive and false negative events, hence increasing both sensitivity and specificity. However, with manual gating, at most two markers can be examined in a single dot plot, and a sequential strategy is often used. As the sequential strategy discards events that fall outside preceding gates at each stage, the effectiveness of the strategy is difficult to evaluate without laborious and painstaking back-gating. Model-based analysis is a promising computational technique that works using information from all marker dimensions simultaneously, and offers an alternative approach to flow analysis that can usefully complement manual gating in the design of optimal gating strategies. Results from model-based analysis will be illustrated with examples from FCM assays commonly used in cancer immunotherapy laboratories.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Herzenberg LA, Tung J et al (2006) Interpreting flow cytometry data: a guide for the perplexed. Nat Immunol 7(7):681–685CrossRefPubMed Herzenberg LA, Tung J et al (2006) Interpreting flow cytometry data: a guide for the perplexed. Nat Immunol 7(7):681–685CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Schenker EL, Hultin LE et al (1993) Evaluation of a dual-color flow cytometry immunophenotyping panel in a multicenter quality assurance program. Cytometry 14(3):307–317CrossRefPubMed Schenker EL, Hultin LE et al (1993) Evaluation of a dual-color flow cytometry immunophenotyping panel in a multicenter quality assurance program. Cytometry 14(3):307–317CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Nicholson J, Kidd P et al (1996) Three-color supplement to the NIAID DAIDS guideline for flow cytometric immunophenotyping. Cytometry 26(3):227–230CrossRefPubMed Nicholson J, Kidd P et al (1996) Three-color supplement to the NIAID DAIDS guideline for flow cytometric immunophenotyping. Cytometry 26(3):227–230CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schnizlein-Bick CT, Mandy FF et al (2002) Use of CD45 gating in three and four-color flow cytometric immunophenotyping: guideline from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of AIDS. Cytometry 50(2):46–52CrossRefPubMed Schnizlein-Bick CT, Mandy FF et al (2002) Use of CD45 gating in three and four-color flow cytometric immunophenotyping: guideline from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of AIDS. Cytometry 50(2):46–52CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Reimann KA, O’Gorman MR et al (2000) Multisite comparison of CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocyte counting by single- versus multiple-platform methodologies: evaluation of Beckman Coulter flow-count fluorospheres and the tetraONE system. The NIAID DAIDS New Technologies Evaluation Group. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 7(3):344–351PubMed Reimann KA, O’Gorman MR et al (2000) Multisite comparison of CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocyte counting by single- versus multiple-platform methodologies: evaluation of Beckman Coulter flow-count fluorospheres and the tetraONE system. The NIAID DAIDS New Technologies Evaluation Group. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 7(3):344–351PubMed
6.
go back to reference Schnizlein-Bick CT, Spritzler J et al (2000) Evaluation of TruCount absolute-count tubes for determining CD4 and CD8 cell numbers in human immunodeficiency virus-positive adults. Site investigators and the NIAID DAIDS New Technologies Evaluation Group. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 7(3):336–343PubMed Schnizlein-Bick CT, Spritzler J et al (2000) Evaluation of TruCount absolute-count tubes for determining CD4 and CD8 cell numbers in human immunodeficiency virus-positive adults. Site investigators and the NIAID DAIDS New Technologies Evaluation Group. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 7(3):336–343PubMed
7.
go back to reference Denny TN, Gelman R et al (2008) A North American multilaboratory study of CD4 counts using flow cytometric panLeukogating (PLG): a NIAID-DAIDS Immunology Quality Assessment Program Study. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 74(Suppl 1):S52–S64PubMed Denny TN, Gelman R et al (2008) A North American multilaboratory study of CD4 counts using flow cytometric panLeukogating (PLG): a NIAID-DAIDS Immunology Quality Assessment Program Study. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 74(Suppl 1):S52–S64PubMed
8.
go back to reference Maecker HT, Rinfret A et al (2005) Standardization of cytokine flow cytometry assays. BMC Immunol 6:13CrossRefPubMed Maecker HT, Rinfret A et al (2005) Standardization of cytokine flow cytometry assays. BMC Immunol 6:13CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sutherland DR, Anderson L et al (1996) The ISHAGE guidelines for CD34+ cell determination by flow cytometry. International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering. J Hematother 5(3):213–226PubMed Sutherland DR, Anderson L et al (1996) The ISHAGE guidelines for CD34+ cell determination by flow cytometry. International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering. J Hematother 5(3):213–226PubMed
10.
go back to reference Perfetto SP, Chattopadhyay PK et al (2004) Seventeen-colour flow cytometry: unravelling the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 4(8):648–655CrossRefPubMed Perfetto SP, Chattopadhyay PK et al (2004) Seventeen-colour flow cytometry: unravelling the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 4(8):648–655CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference McLaughlin BE, Baumgarth N et al (2008) Nine-color flow cytometry for accurate measurement of T cell subsets and cytokine responses. Part II: panel performance across different instrument platforms. Cytometry A 73(5):411–420PubMed McLaughlin BE, Baumgarth N et al (2008) Nine-color flow cytometry for accurate measurement of T cell subsets and cytokine responses. Part II: panel performance across different instrument platforms. Cytometry A 73(5):411–420PubMed
12.
go back to reference Maecker HT, Frey T et al (2004) Selecting fluorochrome conjugates for maximum sensitivity. Cytometry A 62(2):169–173CrossRefPubMed Maecker HT, Frey T et al (2004) Selecting fluorochrome conjugates for maximum sensitivity. Cytometry A 62(2):169–173CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lamoreaux L, Roederer M et al (2006) Intracellular cytokine optimization and standard operating procedure. Nat Protoc 1(3):1507–1516CrossRefPubMed Lamoreaux L, Roederer M et al (2006) Intracellular cytokine optimization and standard operating procedure. Nat Protoc 1(3):1507–1516CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Horton H, Thomas EP et al (2007) Optimization and validation of an 8-color intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assay to quantify antigen-specific T cells induced by vaccination. J Immunol Methods 323(1):39–54CrossRefPubMed Horton H, Thomas EP et al (2007) Optimization and validation of an 8-color intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assay to quantify antigen-specific T cells induced by vaccination. J Immunol Methods 323(1):39–54CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Landay AL, Brambilla D et al (1995) Interlaboratory variability of CD8 subset measurements by flow cytometry and its applications to multicenter clinical trials. NAID/NICHD Women and Infants Transmission Study Group. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2(4):462–468PubMed Landay AL, Brambilla D et al (1995) Interlaboratory variability of CD8 subset measurements by flow cytometry and its applications to multicenter clinical trials. NAID/NICHD Women and Infants Transmission Study Group. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2(4):462–468PubMed
16.
go back to reference Levering WH, van Wieringen WN et al (2008) Flow cytometric lymphocyte subset enumeration: 10 years of external quality assessment in the Benelux countries. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 74(2):79–90PubMed Levering WH, van Wieringen WN et al (2008) Flow cytometric lymphocyte subset enumeration: 10 years of external quality assessment in the Benelux countries. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 74(2):79–90PubMed
17.
go back to reference Britten CM, Gouttefangeas C et al (2008) The CIMT-monitoring panel: a two-step approach to harmonize the enumeration of antigen-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes by structural and functional assays. Cancer Immunol Immunother 57(3):289–302CrossRefPubMed Britten CM, Gouttefangeas C et al (2008) The CIMT-monitoring panel: a two-step approach to harmonize the enumeration of antigen-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes by structural and functional assays. Cancer Immunol Immunother 57(3):289–302CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Janetzki S, Panageas KS et al (2008) Results and harmonization guidelines from two large-scale international Elispot proficiency panels conducted by the Cancer Vaccine Consortium (CVC/SVI). Cancer Immunol Immunother 57(3):303–315CrossRefPubMed Janetzki S, Panageas KS et al (2008) Results and harmonization guidelines from two large-scale international Elispot proficiency panels conducted by the Cancer Vaccine Consortium (CVC/SVI). Cancer Immunol Immunother 57(3):303–315CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Britten CM, Janetzki S et al (2009) Harmonization guidelines for HLA-peptide multimer assays derived from results of a large scale international proficiency panel of the Cancer Vaccine Consortium. Cancer Immunol Immunother 58(10):1701–1713CrossRefPubMed Britten CM, Janetzki S et al (2009) Harmonization guidelines for HLA-peptide multimer assays derived from results of a large scale international proficiency panel of the Cancer Vaccine Consortium. Cancer Immunol Immunother 58(10):1701–1713CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Janetzki S, Price L et al (2010) Performance of serum-supplemented and serum-free media in IFNgamma Elispot Assays for human T cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother 59(4):609–618CrossRefPubMed Janetzki S, Price L et al (2010) Performance of serum-supplemented and serum-free media in IFNgamma Elispot Assays for human T cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother 59(4):609–618CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Boedigheimer MJ, Ferbas J (2008) Mixture modeling approach to flow cytometry data. Cytometry A 73A(5):421–429CrossRef Boedigheimer MJ, Ferbas J (2008) Mixture modeling approach to flow cytometry data. Cytometry A 73A(5):421–429CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chan C, Feng F et al (2008) Statistical mixture modeling for cell subtype identification in flow cytometry. Cytometry A 73(8):693–701PubMed Chan C, Feng F et al (2008) Statistical mixture modeling for cell subtype identification in flow cytometry. Cytometry A 73(8):693–701PubMed
23.
go back to reference Lo K, Brinkman RR et al (2008) Automated gating of flow cytometry data via robust model-based clustering. Cytometry A 73(4):321–332PubMed Lo K, Brinkman RR et al (2008) Automated gating of flow cytometry data via robust model-based clustering. Cytometry A 73(4):321–332PubMed
24.
go back to reference Pyne S, Hu X et al (2009) Automated high-dimensional flow cytometric data analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(21):8519–8524CrossRefPubMed Pyne S, Hu X et al (2009) Automated high-dimensional flow cytometric data analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(21):8519–8524CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
go back to reference Titterington D, Smith AFM et al (1985) Statistical analysis of finite mixture distributions. Wiley, New York Titterington D, Smith AFM et al (1985) Statistical analysis of finite mixture distributions. Wiley, New York
27.
go back to reference Robert CP (1996) Mixtures of distributions: inference and estimation. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 441–464 Robert CP (1996) Mixtures of distributions: inference and estimation. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 441–464
28.
go back to reference Suchard M, Wang Q et al (2010) Understanding GPU programming for statistical computation: studies in massively parallel massive mixtures. J Comput Graph Stat. doi:10.1198/jcgs.2010.10016 Suchard M, Wang Q et al (2010) Understanding GPU programming for statistical computation: studies in massively parallel massive mixtures. J Comput Graph Stat. doi:10.​1198/​jcgs.​2010.​10016
29.
go back to reference Feyerabend S, Stevanovic S, Gouttefangeas C et al (2009) Novel multi-peptide vaccination in Hla-A2+ hormone sensitive patients with biochemical relapse of prostate cancer. Prostate 69:917–927CrossRefPubMed Feyerabend S, Stevanovic S, Gouttefangeas C et al (2009) Novel multi-peptide vaccination in Hla-A2+ hormone sensitive patients with biochemical relapse of prostate cancer. Prostate 69:917–927CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Ornatsky O, Baranov VI et al (2006) Multiple cellular antigen detection by ICP-MS. J Immunol Methods 308(1–2):68–76CrossRefPubMed Ornatsky O, Baranov VI et al (2006) Multiple cellular antigen detection by ICP-MS. J Immunol Methods 308(1–2):68–76CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Hadrup SR, Bakker AH et al (2009) Parallel detection of antigen-specific T-cell responses by multidimensional encoding of MHC multimers. Nat Methods 6(7):520–526CrossRefPubMed Hadrup SR, Bakker AH et al (2009) Parallel detection of antigen-specific T-cell responses by multidimensional encoding of MHC multimers. Nat Methods 6(7):520–526CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Newell EW, Klein LO et al (2009) Simultaneous detection of many T-cell specificities using combinatorial tetramer staining. Nat Methods 6(7):497–499CrossRefPubMed Newell EW, Klein LO et al (2009) Simultaneous detection of many T-cell specificities using combinatorial tetramer staining. Nat Methods 6(7):497–499CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Modeling flow cytometry data for cancer vaccine immune monitoring
Authors
Jacob Frelinger
Janet Ottinger
Cécile Gouttefangeas
Cliburn Chan
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy / Issue 9/2010
Print ISSN: 0340-7004
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0851
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-010-0883-4

Other articles of this Issue 9/2010

Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 9/2010 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine